Literature DB >> 14691609

Effects of photon attenuation on the determination of cardiac volumes from reconstructed counts in gated blood pool SPET.

Therese Seierstad1, Trond Bogsrud, Arne Skretting.   

Abstract

In gated cardiac blood pool single-photon emission tomography (SPET), the volume of a ventricle may be determined by a method that exploits the proportionality between that volume and the total reconstructed counts within a larger volume of interest that includes the actual ventricle. The present work was carried out to determine how the attenuation of photons modifies the reconstructed counts obtained with this technique, and how this affects the accuracy of volume determination. Furthermore, we wanted to investigate how count-based determination of ventricle volumes is affected by the total SPET rotation angle and by different arm positions. We used micro -maps derived from computed tomography (CT) series of nine arbitrarily chosen patients to calculate a volume correction factor for each cardiac volume manually drawn on the CT images. An anthropomorphic chest phantom was used to confirm the calculation of correction factors. For the regions of the ventricles contained within a CT slice through the central part of the heart, the left to right volume ratio needed to be corrected by factors of 1.21 and 1.12 for 180 degrees and 360 degrees rotation, respectively. When all voxels within the left and right ventricles were included, the required volume ratio correction factor was close to 1. However, the variation among patients was larger for a 180 degrees (range 0.97-1.08) than for a 360 degrees rotation arc (range 1.0-1.03).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14691609     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-003-1335-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  7 in total

1.  The calibration of CT Hounsfield units for radiotherapy treatment planning.

Authors:  U Schneider; E Pedroni; A Lomax
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Left ventricular ejection fraction: comparison of results from planar and SPECT gated blood-pool studies.

Authors:  M L Bartlett; G Srinivasan; W C Barker; A N Kitsiou; V Dilsizian; S L Bacharach
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Comparison between 180 degrees and 360 degrees data collection in technetium-99m MIBI SPECT of the myocardium.

Authors:  J C Maublant; P Peycelon; F Kwiatkowski; J R Lusson; R H Standke; A Veyre
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Generalized scatter correction method in SPECT using point scatter distribution functions.

Authors:  P Msaki; B Axelsson; C M Dahl; S A Larsson
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Fundamentals of 180 degree acquisition and reconstruction in SPECT imaging.

Authors:  R L Eisner; D J Nowak; R Pettigrew; W Fajman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Computed tomography for radiotherapy planning.

Authors:  J J Battista; W D Rider; J Van Dyk
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Evaluation of right and left ventricular volume and ejection fraction using a mathematical cardiac torso phantom.

Authors:  P H Pretorius; W Xia; M A King; B M Tsui; T S Pan; B J Villegas
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 10.057

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Influence of CT-based attenuation correction in assessment of left and right ventricular functions with count-based gated blood-pool SPECT.

Authors:  Louis Sibille; Fayçal Ben Bouallegue; Aurélie Bourdon; Denis Mariano-Goulart
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Assessment of an intermediate reprojection technique transitioning from planar to SPECT radionuclide ventriculography.

Authors:  Jim O'Doherty; Bruno Rojas Fisher; Jonathan Mark Price; Kshama Wechalekar
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 5.952

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.