Literature DB >> 2786937

Comparison between 180 degrees and 360 degrees data collection in technetium-99m MIBI SPECT of the myocardium.

J C Maublant1, P Peycelon, F Kwiatkowski, J R Lusson, R H Standke, A Veyre.   

Abstract

In a series of 12 patients presenting with a single-vessel coronary artery disease and who were injected with 370 MBq of 99mTc-2-methoxyisobutylisonitrile at peak exercise, two consecutive single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) data collections, i.e., 32 views of 30 sec during a 180 degrees rotation and 64 views of 15 sec during a 360 degrees rotation, were performed 1 hr later. In both cases, transverse sections were reconstructed using (a) a backprojection method with a ramp filter, (b) a correction for downscatter, (c) a correction for depth attenuation by the Chang method, or (d) both corrections. Each reconstructed myocardium was then divided into four short-axis sections which were radially divided into nine sectors. Sectors with an activity below 80% of the maximum were considered as abnormal. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated relative to a sector-by-sector theoretical anatomic distribution of the perfusion abnormalities. Results demonstrate that, of all situations, the best balance between sensitivity and specificity was achieved with the 180 degrees data collection and no correction at reconstruction. Using the 360 degrees data sampling technique mainly lowered the sensitivity in the patients with a circumflex or right coronary artery disease. It is concluded that there does not seem to be any definite advantage in performing a 360 degrees rather than a 180 degrees data collection in 99mTc myocardial SPECT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2786937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of 180 degrees and 360 degrees acquisition for myocardial perfusion SPECT with compensation for attenuation, detector response, and scatter: Monte Carlo and mathematical observer results.

Authors:  Xin He; Jonathan M Links; Karen L Gilland; Benjamin M W Tsui; Eric C Frey
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Reducing the small-heart effect in pediatric gated myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography.

Authors:  Hiroto Yoneyama; Kenichi Nakajima; Koichi Okuda; Shinro Matsuo; Masahisa Onoguchi; Seigo Kinuya; Lars Edenbrandt
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Clinical comparison of 180-degree and 360-degree data collection of technetium 99m sestamibi SPECT for detection of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  M R Freeman; C Konstantinou; A Barr; N D Greyson
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Comparison of 180 degrees and 360 degrees data acquisition for determination of left ventricular function from gated myocardial perfusion tomography and gated blood pool tomography.

Authors:  Christian Vanhove; Philippe R Franken; Michel Defrise; Axel Bossuyt
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-07-10       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Effects of photon attenuation on the determination of cardiac volumes from reconstructed counts in gated blood pool SPET.

Authors:  Therese Seierstad; Trond Bogsrud; Arne Skretting
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-12-23       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  The importance of population-specific normal database for quantification of myocardial ischemia: comparison between Japanese 360 and 180-degree databases and a US database.

Authors:  Kenichi Nakajima; Koichi Okuda; Masaya Kawano; Shinro Matsuo; Piotr Slomka; Guido Germano; Seigo Kinuya
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography as a diagnostic method in ischemic heart disease - basic technical aspects.

Authors:  Jarosław Pleśniak
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2011-07

8.  Comparison of 180° and 360° Arc Data Acquisition to Measure Scintigraphic Parameters from Gated Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: Is There Any Difference?

Authors:  Hamid Javadi; Ali Mahmoud-Pashazadeh; Mehdi Mogharrabi; Darioush Iranpour; Abdollatif Amini; Mohammadreza Pourbehi; Mehdi Akbarzadeh; Iraj Nabipour; Majid Assadi
Journal:  Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther       Date:  2016-02-05

9.  Target localization using scanner-acquired SPECT data.

Authors:  Justin R Roper; James E Bowsher; Joshua M Wilson; Timothy G Turkington; Fang-Fang Yin
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 2.102

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.