Literature DB >> 21533698

Deliberate utilization of interaction torques brakes elbow extension in a fast throwing motion.

Jon Hore1, Derek B Debicki, Paul L Gribble, Sherry Watts.   

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that in fast arm movements the CNS deliberately utilizes interaction torques to decelerate (brake) joint rotations. Twelve subjects performed fast 2-D overarm throws in which large elbow extension velocities occurred. Joint motions were computed from recordings made with search coils; joint torques were calculated using inverse dynamics. After ball release, a large follow-through shoulder extension acceleration occurred that was initiated by shoulder extensor muscle torque. This shoulder acceleration produced a flexor interaction torque at the elbow that initiated elbow deceleration (braking). An instantaneous mechanical interaction of passive torques then occurred between elbow and shoulder, i.e., elbow extension deceleration produced a large shoulder extensor interaction torque that contributed to the shoulder extension acceleration which, simultaneously, produced a large elbow flexor interaction torque that contributed to elbow extension deceleration, and so on. Late elbow flexor muscle torque also contributed to elbow deceleration. The interaction of passive torques between shoulder and elbow was braked by shoulder flexor muscle torque. In this mechanism, shoulder musculature contributed to braking elbow extension in two ways: shoulder extensors initiated the mechanical interaction of passive torques between shoulder and elbow and shoulder flexors dissipated kinetic energy from elbow braking. It is concluded that, in fast 2-D throws, the CNS deliberately utilizes powerful interaction torques between shoulder and elbow to brake motion at the elbow.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21533698     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2646-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  40 in total

1.  Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and nondominant arm reaching.

Authors:  R L Sainburg; D Kalakanis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  A three-dimensional, six-segment chain analysis of forceful overarm throwing.

Authors:  D A Hong; T K Cheung; E M Roberts
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.368

3.  Braking of elbow extension in fast overarm throws made by skilled and unskilled subjects.

Authors:  J Hore; D B Debicki; S Watts
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Influence of predominant patterns of coordination on the exploitation of interaction torques in a two-joint rhythmic arm movement.

Authors:  Aymar de Rugy; Stephan Riek; Richard G Carson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  General coordination of shoulder, elbow and wrist dynamics during multijoint arm movements.

Authors:  James C Galloway; Gail F Koshland
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Coordinating two degrees of freedom during human arm movement: load and speed invariance of relative joint torques.

Authors:  G L Gottlieb; Q Song; D A Hong; D M Corcos
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Muscle activation patterns during two types of voluntary single-joint movement.

Authors:  G L Gottlieb
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Errors in the control of joint rotations associated with inaccuracies in overarm throws.

Authors:  J Hore; S Watts; D Tweed
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Movement-related phasic muscle activation. II. Generation and functional role of the triphasic pattern.

Authors:  J D Cooke; S H Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Learning a single limb multijoint coordination pattern: the impact of a mechanical constraint on the coordination dynamics of learning and transfer.

Authors:  John J Buchanan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  4 in total

1.  Immediate compensation for variations in self-generated Coriolis torques related to body dynamics and carried objects.

Authors:  Pascale Pigeon; Paul Dizio; James R Lackner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The leading joint hypothesis for spatial reaching arm motions.

Authors:  Satyajit Ambike; James P Schmiedeler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Strategy of arm movement control is determined by minimization of neural effort for joint coordination.

Authors:  Natalia Dounskaia; Yury Shimansky
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Adaptive use of interaction torque during arm reaching movement from the optimal control viewpoint.

Authors:  Van Hoan Vu; Brice Isableu; Bastien Berret
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.