Literature DB >> 11756908

Prospective assessment of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for noninvasive imaging of the biliary tree.

Andrew C F Taylor1, Andrew F Little, Oliver F Hennessy, Simon W Banting, Peter J Smith, Paul V Desmond.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, ERCP has been the only reliable method for imaging the biliary tree, but it is invasive and carries a risk of complications. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is a noninvasive method for imaging the biliary tree. The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the accuracy of MRCP in a large number of patients.
METHODS: Consecutive patients referred to a teaching hospital for ERCP were eligible for study entry. MRCP was performed within 24 hours before ERCP. MRCP findings were compared with ERCP findings or, when the initial ERCP was unsuccessful, with results of repeat ERCP, percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography, or surgery.
RESULTS: One hundred forty-six patients underwent 149 ERCP/MRCP procedures, of which 129 were evaluable with successful MRCP and ERCP or an ERCP-equivalent study. Diagnoses included choledocholithiasis in 46 and biliary stricture in 12 patients. The sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values for MRCP in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis were 97.9%, 89.0%, 83.6%, and 98.6%, respectively. All 12 strictures were diagnosed by MRCP (sensitivity 100%, specificity 99.1%).
CONCLUSIONS: MRCP is an accurate, noninvasive alternative to ERCP for imaging the biliary tree. Choledocholithiasis and biliary strictures can be reliably diagnosed or excluded by MRCP. MRCP should be used increasingly in patients with suspected biliary obstruction to select those who require a therapeutic procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11756908     DOI: 10.1067/mge.2002.120324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  32 in total

1.  A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited.

Authors:  Chris Collins; Donal Maguire; Adrian Ireland; Edward Fitzgerald; Gerald C O'Sullivan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Choledocholithiasis: repetitive thick-slab single-shot projection magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography versus endoscopic ultrasonography.

Authors:  S Schmidt; P Chevallier; S Novellas; E Gelsi; G Vanbiervliet; A Tran; P Schnyder; J N Bruneton
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  [Interventions for benign biliary strictures].

Authors:  A Lubienski; M Duex; K Lubienski; J Blietz; G W Kauffmann; T Helmberger
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Noninvasive imaging of the common bile duct before invasive imaging after biliary pancreatitis.

Authors:  J C Rodríguez-Sanjuán; M Gómez-Fleitas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Prospective comparative study of negative oral contrast agents for magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Satoru Morita; Eiko Ueno; Ai Masukawa; Kazufumi Suzuki; Mikihiko Fujimura; Nozomi Hirabayashi; Shinya Kojima; Masami Hirata; Kazuhiro Kitajima; Yasushi Kaji
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 2.374

6.  Comparison of different MRCP techniques for the depiction of biliary complications after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Sonja Kinner; Alexander Dechêne; Susanne C Ladd; Thomas Zöpf; Evelin Maldonado de Dechêne; Guido Gerken; Thomas C Lauenstein
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Endoscopic management of post-liver transplant biliary complications.

Authors:  Mohit Girotra; Kaartik Soota; Jagpal S Klair; Shyam M Dang; Farshad Aduli
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-05-16

Review 8.  Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Wen Chen; Jing-Jia Mo; Li Lin; Chao-Qun Li; Jian-Feng Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Predicting and preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Authors:  John Baillie
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2002-04

10.  Comparison of diagnostic imaging modalities for the evaluation of pancreatic duct injury in children: a multi-institutional analysis from the Pancreatic Trauma Study Group.

Authors:  Eric H Rosenfeld; Adam Vogel; Robert T Russell; Ilan Maizlin; Denise B Klinkner; Stephanie Polites; Barbara Gaines; Christine Leeper; Stallion Anthony; Megan Waddell; Shawn St Peter; David Juang; Rajan Thakkar; Joseph Drews; Brandon Behrens; Mubeen Jafri; Randall S Burd; Marianne Beaudin; Laurence Carmant; Richard A Falcone; Suzanne Moody; Bindi J Naik-Mathuria
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 1.827

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.