Literature DB >> 103451

Cost-effectiveness of operative cholangiography.

J C Skillings, J S Williams, J R Hinshaw.   

Abstract

(1) Three hundred seventy-seven of 1,616 patients undergoing cholecystectomy between January 1, 1971 and December 31, 1975 had intraoperative cholangiograms and form the basis for this study. (2) The cholangiograms of thirty-seven patients were interpreted as positive for ductal disease, but only twenty-three had confirmed disease on common bile duct exploration. The average false-positive rate was 38 per cent per year. (3) One hundred nine patients had cholangiograms because of small stones in the gallbladder, and only one study was true-positive. (4) One hundred nineteen patients had cholangiograms without any clinical indication for the study. Only one was true-positive for intraductal disease. (5) Operative cholangiograms done routinely or for multiple small stones rarely reveal intraductal disease (2 of 228, or 0.9 per cent). (6) Of 149 cholangiograms in patients with clinical indications other than multiple small stones, twenty-one of twenty-six positive cholangiograms were true-positive, for an 81 per cent accuracy. (7) Operative time was prolonged an average of 31 minutes when cholangiography was performed. (8) The 377 cholangiograms cost $21,866. Of the 228 studies done routinely or for only multiple small stones, two were positive, for a cost of $6,612 per positive examination. (9) Therefore, to be cost-effective, the use of intraoperative cholangiography is indicated only when standard criteria for ductal exploration, with the exception of the presence of small calculi, are present.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 103451     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(79)90006-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  8 in total

1.  A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited.

Authors:  Chris Collins; Donal Maguire; Adrian Ireland; Edward Fitzgerald; Gerald C O'Sullivan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Selective cholangiography. Current role in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  K D Lillemoe; C J Yeo; M A Talamini; B H Wang; H A Pitt; T R Gadacz
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Consequences of routine peroperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy for gallstone disease: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  M Hauer-Jensen; R Kåresen; K Nygaard; K Solheim; E Amlie; O Havig; K O Viddal
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Per-operative cholangiography and post-cholecystectomy biliary strictures.

Authors:  C J Kelley; L H Blumgart
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Comparison of operative ultrasonography and radiography in screening of the common bile duct for calculi.

Authors:  J J Jakimowicz; H Rutten; P J Jürgens; E J Carol
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Predictive ability of choledocholithiasis indicators. A prospective evaluation.

Authors:  M Hauer-Jensen; R Kåresen; K Nygaard; K Solheim; E Amlie; O Havig; K O Viddal
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Selective intraoperative cholangiography and single-stage management of common bile duct stone in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Shih-Chi Wu; Feng-Chi Chen; Chong-Jeh Lo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Intraoperative cholangiography. A review of indications and analysis of age-sex groups.

Authors:  S B Levine; H J Lerner; E D Leifer; S R Lindheim
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 12.969

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.