Literature DB >> 14681002

Moray revisited: high-priority affective stimuli and visual search.

Christine R Harris1, Harold E Pashler, Noriko Coburn.   

Abstract

Previous research offers conflicting suggestions about whether "high-priority" verbal stimuli such as an individual's own name or emotionally charged words automatically grab attention and/or can be detected without the usual capacity limitations. Nine experiments investigated this issue, using visual search through displays of words. In speeded search tasks, the subject's own name was detected more quickly than other targets, but in no case were search slopes flat enough to suggest parallel search or "pop-out". Further, names were not found to be unusually potent distractors. Emotionally charged words were neither more readily detected as targets nor more potent as distractors than neutral words. A comparison of observers' accuracy in searching briefly exposed simultaneous vs. successive displays provided further evidence that search for "high-priority" word targets is subject to the same severe capacity limitations as those that are found with search for neutral words.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14681002     DOI: 10.1080/02724980343000107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  19 in total

1.  Evidence of Serial Processing in Visual Word Recognition.

Authors:  Alex L White; John Palmer; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-05-07

2.  Relevant distractors do not cause negative priming.

Authors:  Christian Frings
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-04

3.  Capturing and holding attention: the impact of emotional words in rapid serial visual presentation.

Authors:  Karen J Mathewson; Karen M Arnell; Craig A Mansfield
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-01

4.  On the interdependence of cognition and emotion.

Authors:  Justin Storbeck; Gerald L Clore
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2007

5.  The cognitive advantage for one's own name is not simply familiarity: an eye-tracking study.

Authors:  Hongsheng Yang; Fang Wang; Nianjun Gu; Xiao Gao; Guang Zhao
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

6.  Merely presenting one's own name along with target items is insufficient to produce a memory advantage for the items: A critical role of relational processing.

Authors:  Kyungmi Kim; Jenne D Johnson; Danielle J Rothschild; Marcia K Johnson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

7.  Extending the simultaneous-sequential paradigm to measure perceptual capacity for features and words.

Authors:  Alec Scharff; John Palmer; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Social reward shapes attentional biases.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 3.065

9.  Evidence for unlimited capacity processing of simple features in visual cortex.

Authors:  Alex L White; Erik Runeson; John Palmer; Zachary R Ernst; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Counterintuitive effects of negative social feedback on attention.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2016-01-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.