Literature DB >> 22665781

Accurate protein structure modeling using sparse NMR data and homologous structure information.

James M Thompson1, Nikolaos G Sgourakis, Gaohua Liu, Paolo Rossi, Yuefeng Tang, Jeffrey L Mills, Thomas Szyperski, Gaetano T Montelione, David Baker.   

Abstract

While information from homologous structures plays a central role in X-ray structure determination by molecular replacement, such information is rarely used in NMR structure determination because it can be incorrect, both locally and globally, when evolutionary relationships are inferred incorrectly or there has been considerable evolutionary structural divergence. Here we describe a method that allows robust modeling of protein structures of up to 225 residues by combining (1)H(N), (13)C, and (15)N backbone and (13)Cβ chemical shift data, distance restraints derived from homologous structures, and a physically realistic all-atom energy function. Accurate models are distinguished from inaccurate models generated using incorrect sequence alignments by requiring that (i) the all-atom energies of models generated using the restraints are lower than models generated in unrestrained calculations and (ii) the low-energy structures converge to within 2.0 Å backbone rmsd over 75% of the protein. Benchmark calculations on known structures and blind targets show that the method can accurately model protein structures, even with very remote homology information, to a backbone rmsd of 1.2-1.9 Å relative to the conventional determined NMR ensembles and of 0.9-1.6 Å relative to X-ray structures for well-defined regions of the protein structures. This approach facilitates the accurate modeling of protein structures using backbone chemical shift data without need for side-chain resonance assignments and extensive analysis of NOESY cross-peak assignments.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22665781      PMCID: PMC3382498          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1202485109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  36 in total

1.  NMR analysis of a 900K GroEL GroES complex.

Authors:  Jocelyne Fiaux; Eric B Bertelsen; Arthur L Horwich; Kurt Wüthrich
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-07-11       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Protein NMR structure determination with automated NOE assignment using the new software CANDID and the torsion angle dynamics algorithm DYANA.

Authors:  Torsten Herrmann; Peter Güntert; Kurt Wüthrich
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-05-24       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Toward high-resolution de novo structure prediction for small proteins.

Authors:  Philip Bradley; Kira M S Misura; David Baker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Inferential structure determination.

Authors:  Wolfgang Rieping; Michael Habeck; Michael Nilges
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-07-08       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Disorder-order folding transitions underlie catalysis in the helicase motor of SecA.

Authors:  Dimitra Keramisanou; Nikolaos Biris; Ioannis Gelis; Georgios Sianidis; Spyridoula Karamanou; Anastassios Economou; Charalampos G Kalodimos
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2006-06-18       Impact factor: 15.369

6.  Protein structure determination from NMR chemical shifts.

Authors:  Andrea Cavalli; Xavier Salvatella; Christopher M Dobson; Michele Vendruscolo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Exclusively NOESY-based automated NMR assignment and structure determination of proteins.

Authors:  Teppei Ikeya; Jun-Goo Jee; Yoshiki Shigemitsu; Junpei Hamatsu; Masaki Mishima; Yutaka Ito; Masatsune Kainosho; Peter Güntert
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 2.835

8.  The MUMO (minimal under-restraining minimal over-restraining) method for the determination of native state ensembles of proteins.

Authors:  Barbara Richter; Joerg Gsponer; Péter Várnai; Xavier Salvatella; Michele Vendruscolo
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 2.835

9.  TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Phaser crystallographic software.

Authors:  Airlie J McCoy; Ralf W Grosse-Kunstleve; Paul D Adams; Martyn D Winn; Laurent C Storoni; Randy J Read
Journal:  J Appl Crystallogr       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 3.304

View more
  21 in total

1.  A robust algorithm for optimizing protein structures with NMR chemical shifts.

Authors:  Mark Berjanskii; David Arndt; Yongjie Liang; David S Wishart
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 2.  A community resource of experimental data for NMR / X-ray crystal structure pairs.

Authors:  John K Everett; Roberto Tejero; Sarath B K Murthy; Thomas B Acton; James M Aramini; Michael C Baran; Jordi Benach; John R Cort; Alexander Eletsky; Farhad Forouhar; Rongjin Guan; Alexandre P Kuzin; Hsiau-Wei Lee; Gaohua Liu; Rajeswari Mani; Binchen Mao; Jeffrey L Mills; Alexander F Montelione; Kari Pederson; Robert Powers; Theresa Ramelot; Paolo Rossi; Jayaraman Seetharaman; David Snyder; G V T Swapna; Sergey M Vorobiev; Yibing Wu; Rong Xiao; Yunhuang Yang; Cheryl H Arrowsmith; John F Hunt; Michael A Kennedy; James H Prestegard; Thomas Szyperski; Liang Tong; Gaetano T Montelione
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Consistent global structures of complex RNA states through multidimensional chemical mapping.

Authors:  Clarence Yu Cheng; Fang-Chieh Chou; Wipapat Kladwang; Siqi Tian; Pablo Cordero; Rhiju Das
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Iterative Molecular Dynamics-Rosetta Membrane Protein Structure Refinement Guided by Cryo-EM Densities.

Authors:  Sumudu P Leelananda; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 5.  Chemical shift-based methods in NMR structure determination.

Authors:  Santrupti Nerli; Andrew C McShan; Nikolaos G Sgourakis
Journal:  Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc       Date:  2018-03-11       Impact factor: 9.795

6.  Residue proximity information and protein model discrimination using saturation-suppressor mutagenesis.

Authors:  Anusmita Sahoo; Shruti Khare; Sivasankar Devanarayanan; Pankaj C Jain; Raghavan Varadarajan
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 7.  Computational modeling of membrane proteins.

Authors:  Julia Koehler Leman; Martin B Ulmschneider; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2014-11-19

8.  HASH: a program to accurately predict protein Hα shifts from neighboring backbone shifts.

Authors:  Jianyang Zeng; Pei Zhou; Bruce Randall Donald
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 2.835

9.  Solution NMR refinement of a metal ion bound protein using metal ion inclusive restrained molecular dynamics methods.

Authors:  Dhruva K Chakravorty; Bing Wang; Chul Won Lee; Alfredo J Guerra; David P Giedroc; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 2.835

10.  A mechanism for the auto-inhibition of hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channel opening and its relief by cAMP.

Authors:  Madoka Akimoto; Zaiyong Zhang; Stephen Boulton; Rajeevan Selvaratnam; Bryan VanSchouwen; Melanie Gloyd; Eric A Accili; Oliver F Lange; Giuseppe Melacini
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.