Literature DB >> 14668377

Protein evolution and codon usage bias on the neo-sex chromosomes of Drosophila miranda.

Doris Bachtrog1.   

Abstract

The neo-sex chromosomes of Drosophila miranda constitute an ideal system to study the effects of recombination on patterns of genome evolution. Due to a fusion of an autosome with the Y chromosome, one homolog is transmitted clonally. Here, I compare patterns of molecular evolution of 18 protein-coding genes located on the recombining neo-X and their homologs on the nonrecombining neo-Y chromosome. The rate of protein evolution has significantly increased on the neo-Y lineage since its formation. Amino acid substitutions are accumulating uniformly among neo-Y-linked genes, as expected if all loci on the neo-Y chromosome suffer from a reduced effectiveness of natural selection. In contrast, there is significant heterogeneity in the rate of protein evolution among neo-X-linked genes, with most loci being under strong purifying selection and two genes showing evidence for adaptive evolution. This observation agrees with theory predicting that linkage limits adaptive protein evolution. Both the neo-X and the neo-Y chromosome show an excess of unpreferred codon substitutions over preferred ones and no difference in this pattern was observed between the chromosomes. This suggests that there has been little or no selection maintaining codon bias in the D. miranda lineage. A change in mutational bias toward AT substitutions also contributes to the decline in codon bias. The contrast in patterns of molecular evolution between amino acid mutations and synonymous mutations on the neo-sex-linked genes can be understood in terms of chromosome-specific differences in effective population size and the distribution of selective effects of mutations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14668377      PMCID: PMC1462847     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  43 in total

1.  Natural selection and the frequency distributions of "silent" DNA polymorphism in Drosophila.

Authors:  H Akashi; S W Schaeffer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Deleterious mutation accumulation in organelle genomes.

Authors:  M Lynch; J L Blanchard
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 3.  The evolution of chromosomal sex determination and dosage compensation.

Authors:  B Charlesworth
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1996-02-01       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  On the effective size of populations with separate sexes, with particular reference to sex-linked genes.

Authors:  A Caballero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Simple methods for testing the molecular evolutionary clock hypothesis.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  A method for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions per site.

Authors:  J M Comeron
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Molecular evolution between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: reduced codon bias, faster rates of amino acid substitution, and larger proteins in D. melanogaster.

Authors:  H Akashi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Reduced natural selection associated with low recombination in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  R M Kliman; J Hey
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at "silent" sites in Drosophila DNA.

Authors:  H Akashi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Evolution of the larval cuticle proteins coded by the secondary sex chromosome pair: X2 and neo-Y of Drosophila miranda: I. Comparison at the DNA sequence level.

Authors:  M Steinemann; S Steinemann; W Pinsker
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.395

View more
  28 in total

1.  Patterns of selection on synonymous and nonsynonymous variants in Drosophila miranda.

Authors:  Carolina Bartolomé; Xulio Maside; Soojin Yi; Anna L Grant; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  X-linked genes evolve higher codon bias in Drosophila and Caenorhabditis.

Authors:  Nadia D Singh; Jerel C Davis; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-06-18       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Dosage compensation, the origin and the afterlife of sex chromosomes.

Authors:  Jan Larsson; Victoria H Meller
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Evolution of amino-acid sequences and codon usage on the Drosophila miranda neo-sex chromosomes.

Authors:  Carolina Bartolomé; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-10-08       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Evolution of gene sequence in response to chromosomal location.

Authors:  Carlos Díaz-Castillo; Kent G Golic
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Evolutionary strata on the X chromosomes of the dioecious plant Silene latifolia: evidence from new sex-linked genes.

Authors:  Roberta Bergero; Alan Forrest; Esther Kamau; Deborah Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Evolution of sex chromosomes in insects.

Authors:  Vera B Kaiser; Doris Bachtrog
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 16.830

8.  Muller's ratchet and the degeneration of the Drosophila miranda neo-Y chromosome.

Authors:  Vera B Kaiser; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Analysis of synonymous codon usage in the UL24 gene of duck enteritis virus.

Authors:  Renyong Jia; Anchun Cheng; Mingshu Wang; Hongyi Xin; Yufei Guo; Dekang Zhu; Xuefeng Qi; Lichan Zhao; Han Ge; Xiaoyue Chen
Journal:  Virus Genes       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 2.332

10.  Nucleotide polymorphism and within-gene recombination in Daphnia magna and D. pulex, two cyclical parthenogens.

Authors:  Christoph R Haag; Seanna J McTaggart; Anaïs Didier; Tom J Little; Deborah Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.