Literature DB >> 8913769

Molecular evolution between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: reduced codon bias, faster rates of amino acid substitution, and larger proteins in D. melanogaster.

H Akashi1.   

Abstract

Both natural selection and mutational biases contribute to variation in codon usage bias within Drosophila species. This study addresses the cause of codon bias differences between the sibling species, Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Under a model of mutation-selection-drift, variation in mutational processes between species predicts greater base composition differences in neutrally evolving regions than in highly biased genes. Variation in selection intensity, however, predicts larger base composition differences in highly biased loci. Greater differences in the G+C content of 34 coding regions than 46 intron sequences between D. melanogaster and D. simulans suggest that D. melanogaster has undergone a reduction in selection intensity for codon bias. Computer simulations suggest at least a fivefold reduction in Nes at silent sites in this lineage. Other classes of molecular change show lineage effects between these species. Rates of amino acid substitution are higher in the D. melanogaster lineage than in D. simulans in 14 genes for which outgroup sequences are available. Surprisingly, protein sizes are larger in D. melanogaster than in D. simulans in the 34 genes compared between the two species. A substantial fraction of silent, replacement, and insertion/deletion mutations in coding regions may be weakly selected in Drosophila.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8913769      PMCID: PMC1207620     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  54 in total

1.  On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population.

Authors:  M KIMURA
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1962-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Inferring the evolutionary histories of the Adh and Adh-dup loci in Drosophila melanogaster from patterns of polymorphism and divergence.

Authors:  M Kreitman; R R Hudson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Molecular variation at the vermilion locus in geographically diverse populations of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

Authors:  D J Begun; C F Aquadro
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Protein polymorphism as a phase of molecular evolution.

Authors:  M Kimura; T Ohta
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1971-02-12       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Confidence interval for the number of selectively neutral amino acid polymorphisms.

Authors:  S A Sawyer; D E Dykhuizen; D L Hartl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Lack of polymorphism on the Drosophila fourth chromosome resulting from selection.

Authors:  A J Berry; J W Ajioka; M Kreitman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Correlation between the abundance of yeast transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in protein genes. Differences in synonymous codon choice patterns of yeast and Escherichia coli with reference to the abundance of isoaccepting transfer RNAs.

Authors:  T Ikemura
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1982-07-15       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection.

Authors:  W G Hill; A Robertson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  Evolution and expression of the Sgs-3 glue gene of Drosophila.

Authors:  C H Martin; C A Mayeda; E M Meyerowitz
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1988-05-20       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 10.  Preferential codon usage in prokaryotic genes: the optimal codon-anticodon interaction energy and the selective codon usage in efficiently expressed genes.

Authors:  H Grosjean; W Fiers
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 3.688

View more
  103 in total

1.  Effect of inversion polymorphism on the neutral nucleotide variability of linked chromosomal regions in Drosophila.

Authors:  A Navarro; A Barbadilla; A Ruiz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Nucleotide polymorphism at the RpII215 gene in Drosophila subobscura. Weak selection on synonymous mutations.

Authors:  A Llopart; M Aguadé
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Interactions between natural selection, recombination and gene density in the genes of Drosophila.

Authors:  Jody Hey; Richard M Kliman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Changing effective population size and the McDonald-Kreitman test.

Authors:  Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Estimating the distribution of fitness effects from DNA sequence data: implications for the molecular clock.

Authors:  Gwenaël Piganeau; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-08-18       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Patterns of selection on synonymous and nonsynonymous variants in Drosophila miranda.

Authors:  Carolina Bartolomé; Xulio Maside; Soojin Yi; Anna L Grant; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Quantifying the variation in the effective population size within a genome.

Authors:  Toni I Gossmann; Megan Woolfit; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Genomic variation in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Charles H Langley; Kristian Stevens; Charis Cardeno; Yuh Chwen G Lee; Daniel R Schrider; John E Pool; Sasha A Langley; Charlyn Suarez; Russell B Corbett-Detig; Bryan Kolaczkowski; Shu Fang; Phillip M Nista; Alisha K Holloway; Andrew D Kern; Colin N Dewey; Yun S Song; Matthew W Hahn; David J Begun
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Estimating the genomewide rate of adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila.

Authors:  John J Welch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-04-02       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Evolutionary rate analyses of orthologs and paralogs from 12 Drosophila genomes.

Authors:  Andreas Heger; Chris P Ponting
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 9.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.