Literature DB >> 14668370

Patterns of selection against transposons inferred from the distribution of Tc1, Tc3 and Tc5 insertions in the mut-7 line of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.

Carène Rizzon1, Edwige Martin, Gabriel Marais, Laurent Duret, Laurent Ségalat, Christian Biémont.   

Abstract

To identify the factors (selective or mutational) that affect the distribution of transposable elements (TEs) within a genome, it is necessary to compare the pattern of newly arising element insertions to the pattern of element insertions that have been fixed in a population. To do this, we analyzed the distribution of recent mutant insertions of the Tc1, Tc3, and Tc5 elements in a mut-7 background of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans and compared it to the distribution of element insertions (presumably fixed) within the sequenced genome. Tc1 elements preferentially insert in regions with high recombination rates, whereas Tc3 and Tc5 do not. Although Tc1 and Tc3 both insert in TA dinucleotides, there is no clear relationship between the frequency of insertions and the TA dinucleotide density. There is a strong selection against TE insertions within coding regions: the probability that a TE will be fixed is at least 31 times lower in coding regions than in noncoding regions. Contrary to the prediction of theoretical models, we found that the selective pressure against TE insertions does not increase with the recombination rate. These findings indicate that the distribution of these three transposon families in the genome of C. elegans is determined essentially by just two factors: the pattern of insertions, which is a characteristic of each family, and the selection against insertions within coding regions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14668370      PMCID: PMC1462815     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  33 in total

1.  Transposons but not retrotransposons are located preferentially in regions of high recombination rate in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  L Duret; G Marais; C Biémont
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Transposable element number in mixed mating populations.

Authors:  M T Morgan
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  Repbase update: a database and an electronic journal of repetitive elements.

Authors:  J Jurka
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 11.639

4.  Sure facts, speculations, and open questions about the evolution of transposable element copy number.

Authors:  S V Nuzhdin
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.082

5.  Does recombination improve selection on codon usage? Lessons from nematode and fly complete genomes.

Authors:  G Marais; D Mouchiroud; L Duret
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Control of genes by mammalian retroposons.

Authors:  N V Tomilin
Journal:  Int Rev Cytol       Date:  1999

7.  Developmental expression of the 412 retrotransposon in natural populations of D. melanogaster and D. simulans.

Authors:  N Borie; C Loevenbruck; C Biemont
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  Mut-7 of C. elegans, required for transposon silencing and RNA interference, is a homolog of Werner syndrome helicase and RNaseD.

Authors:  R F Ketting; T H Haverkamp; H G van Luenen; R H Plasterk
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  CHE-3, a cytosolic dynein heavy chain, is required for sensory cilia structure and function in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  S R Wicks; C J de Vries; H G van Luenen; R H Plasterk
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2000-05-15       Impact factor: 3.582

10.  Population dynamics of an Ac-like transposable element in self- and cross-pollinating arabidopsis.

Authors:  S I Wright; Q H Le; D J Schoen; T E Bureau
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  12 in total

1.  Degradation of the Repetitive Genomic Landscape in a Close Relative of Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Gavin C Woodruff; Anastasia A Teterina
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  High-resolution genome-wide mapping of transposon integration in mammals.

Authors:  Stephen R Yant; Xiaolin Wu; Yong Huang; Brian Garrison; Shawn M Burgess; Mark A Kay
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 3.  DNA transposons and the evolution of eukaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Cédric Feschotte; Ellen J Pritham
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 16.830

4.  Epigenetic silencing of transposable elements: a trade-off between reduced transposition and deleterious effects on neighboring gene expression.

Authors:  Jesse D Hollister; Brandon S Gaut
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 5.  Coevolution between transposable elements and recombination.

Authors:  Tyler V Kent; Jasmina Uzunović; Stephen I Wright
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Population genomics of transposable elements in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Dmitri A Petrov; Anna-Sophie Fiston-Lavier; Mikhail Lipatov; Kapa Lenkov; Josefa González
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Transposable element orientation bias in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.

Authors:  Asher D Cutter; Jeffrey M Good; Christopher T Pappas; Matthew A Saunders; Dean M Starrett; Travis J Wheeler
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-11-02       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Epigenetic control of CACTA transposon mobility in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Masaomi Kato; Kazuya Takashima; Tetsuji Kakutani
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Genome-wide analysis of Tol2 transposon reintegration in zebrafish.

Authors:  Igor Kondrychyn; Marta Garcia-Lecea; Alexander Emelyanov; Sergey Parinov; Vladimir Korzh
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Evolution of a transposon in Daphnia hybrid genomes.

Authors:  Roland Vergilino; Tyler A Elliott; Philippe Desjardins-Proulx; Teresa J Crease; France Dufresne
Journal:  Mob DNA       Date:  2013-02-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.