Literature DB >> 32359146

Degradation of the Repetitive Genomic Landscape in a Close Relative of Caenorhabditis elegans.

Gavin C Woodruff1, Anastasia A Teterina1,2.   

Abstract

The abundance, diversity, and genomic distribution of repetitive elements is highly variable among species. These patterns are thought to be driven in part by reproductive mode and the interaction of selection and recombination, and recombination rates typically vary by chromosomal position. In the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, repetitive elements are enriched at chromosome arms and depleted on centers, and this mirrors the chromosomal distributions of other genomic features such as recombination rate. How conserved is this genomic landscape of repeats, and what evolutionary forces maintain it? To address this, we compared the genomic organization of repetitive elements across five Caenorhabditis species with chromosome-level assemblies. As previously reported, repeat content is enriched on chromosome arms in most Caenorhabditis species, and no obvious patterns of repeat content associated with reproductive mode were observed. However, the fig-associated C. inopinata has experienced repetitive element expansion and reveals no association of global repeat density with chromosome position. Patterns of repeat superfamily specific distributions reveal this global pattern is driven largely by a few repeat superfamilies that in C. inopinata have expanded in number and have weak associations with chromosome position. Additionally, 15% of predicted protein-coding genes in C. inopinata align to transposon-related proteins. When these are excluded, C. inopinata has no enrichment of genes in chromosome centers, in contrast to its close relatives who all have such clusters. Forward evolutionary simulations reveal that chromosomal heterogeneity in recombination rate alone can generate structured repetitive genomic landscapes when insertions are weakly deleterious, whereas chromosomal heterogeneity in the fitness effects of transposon insertion can promote such landscapes across a variety of evolutionary scenarios. Thus, patterns of gene density along chromosomes likely contribute to global repetitive landscapes in this group, although other historical or genomic factors are needed to explain the idiosyncrasy of genomic organization of various transposable element taxa within C. inopinata. Taken together, these results highlight the power of comparative genomics and evolutionary simulations in testing hypotheses regarding the causes of genome organization.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990 Caenorhabditiszzm321990 ; genome organization; recombination; transposable elements

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32359146      PMCID: PMC7475029          DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msaa107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  108 in total

1.  Automated de novo identification of repeat sequence families in sequenced genomes.

Authors:  Zhirong Bao; Sean R Eddy
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Accumulation of transposable elements in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster is associated with a decrease in fitness.

Authors:  E G Pasyukova; S V Nuzhdin; T V Morozova; T F C Mackay
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.645

3.  Repbase Update, a database of repetitive elements in eukaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Weidong Bao; Kenji K Kojima; Oleksiy Kohany
Journal:  Mob DNA       Date:  2015-06-02

Review 4.  The population genetics of Drosophila transposable elements.

Authors:  B Charlesworth; C H Langley
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 16.830

Review 5.  Males, Outcrossing, and Sexual Selection in Caenorhabditis Nematodes.

Authors:  Asher D Cutter; Levi T Morran; Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Population genomics of transposable elements in Drosophila.

Authors:  Maite G Barrón; Anna-Sophie Fiston-Lavier; Dmitri A Petrov; Josefa González
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 16.830

7.  Reproductive Mode and the Evolution of Genome Size and Structure in Caenorhabditis Nematodes.

Authors:  Janna L Fierst; John H Willis; Cristel G Thomas; Wei Wang; Rose M Reynolds; Timothy E Ahearne; Asher D Cutter; Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Genome analysis of Diploscapter coronatus: insights into molecular peculiarities of a nematode with parthenogenetic reproduction.

Authors:  Hideaki Hiraki; Hiroshi Kagoshima; Christopher Kraus; Philipp H Schiffer; Yumiko Ueta; Michael Kroiher; Einhard Schierenberg; Yuji Kohara
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Caenorhabditis elegans ADAR editing and the ERI-6/7/MOV10 RNAi pathway silence endogenous viral elements and LTR retrotransposons.

Authors:  Sylvia E J Fischer; Gary Ruvkun
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The many landscapes of recombination in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Josep M Comeron; Ramesh Ratnappan; Samuel Bailin
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Charting the genomic landscape of seed-free plants.

Authors:  Péter Szövényi; Andika Gunadi; Fay-Wei Li
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 15.793

2.  Analysis of repeat elements in the Pristionchus pacificus genome reveals an ancient invasion by horizontally transferred transposons.

Authors:  Marina Athanasouli; Christian Rödelsperger
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.547

3.  Intraspecific de novo gene birth revealed by presence-absence variant genes in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Bo Yun Lee; Jun Kim; Junho Lee
Journal:  NAR Genom Bioinform       Date:  2022-04-21

Review 4.  Nematode chromosomes.

Authors:  Peter M Carlton; Richard E Davis; Shawn Ahmed
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.402

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.