Literature DB >> 14665841

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: the University of Maryland 6-year experience.

Stephen C Jacobs1, Eugene Cho, Clarence Foster, Peter Liao, Stephen T Bartlett.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We determined whether the results of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy warranted expansion of the availability of the technique.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Donor and recipient charts for 738 consecutive laparoscopic living donor nephrectomies have been reviewed.
RESULTS: Renal donors were 69% white race and 57% female. Age range was 18 to 74 years. Neither age nor obesity alone were exclusionary criteria. Nephrectomy was left sided in 96%. Donors with body mass index greater than 33 had longer operative times. The extraction site changed from umbilical to suprapubic during the series. Warm ischemia time was 169 seconds. Conversion to open nephrectomy occurred in 1.6% of cases and blood transfusion was required in 1.2%. Major intraoperative complications occurred in 6.8% and major postoperative complications occurred in 17.1% of cases. Hospitalization lasted 64.4 hours. Postoperative donor creatinine was 1.5 times the preoperative level. Recipient serum creatinine averaged 2.0 mg% at 1 week and 1.6 mg% at 1 year. Delayed graft function occurred in 2.6%. However, 9.1% of recipients did not achieve a serum creatinine less than 3.0 mg% within 7 days. The endovascular stapler also created 37 extra arteries for implantation.
CONCLUSIONS: Risks of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy to the donor must not be minimized. Rapid conversion to open surgery to control bleeding may be necessary. Nonvascular intraoperative injuries require recognition. Slow bowel function recovery prolongs hospitalization and may indicate unrecognized pancreatitis or small bowel herniation. Surgical technique and complication management have improved. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is now routine but still requires an intense level of attention to prevention of complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14665841     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000100221.20410.4a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  44 in total

1.  [Is the traditional open donor nephrectomy in living donor renal transplantation still up to date?].

Authors:  Karolin Thiel; Christian Thiel; Martin Schenk; Ruth Ladurner; Silvio Nadalin; Nils Heyne; Alfred Königsrainer; Wolfgang Steurer
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 2.  [Ten years of laparoscopic living kidney donation. From an extravagant to a routine procedure].

Authors:  M Giessing; T F Fuller; S Deger; J Roigas; M Tüllmann; L Liefeldt; K Budde; T Fischer; B Winkelmann; D Schnorr; S A Loening
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy: donor outcome and complication rate in comparison with three different techniques.

Authors:  Robin Ruszat; Tullio Sulser; Michael Dickenmann; Thomas Wolff; Lorenz Gürke; Thomas Eugster; Igor Langer; Peter Vogelbach; Jürg Steiger; Thomas C Gasser; Christian G Stief; Alexander Bachmann
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Fatal and nonfatal hemorrhagic complications of living kidney donation.

Authors:  Amy L Friedman; Thomas G Peters; Kenneth W Jones; L Ebony Boulware; Lloyd E Ratner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Cumulative sum analysis of the learning curve for video-assisted minilaparotomy donor nephrectomy in healthy kidney donors.

Authors:  Jee Soo Park; Hyun Kyu Ahn; Joonchae Na; Hyung Ho Lee; Young Eun Yoon; Min Gee Yoon; Woong Kyu Han
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Quantitative detection of promoter hypermethylation as a biomarker of acute kidney injury during transplantation.

Authors:  T K Mehta; M O Hoque; R Ugarte; M H Rahman; E Kraus; R Montgomery; K Melancon; D Sidransky; H Rabb
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.066

7.  No need for systemic heparinization during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy with short warm ischemia time.

Authors:  Frank Friedersdorff; Ingmar Wolff; Serdar Deger; Jan Roigas; John Buckendahl; Hannes Cash; Markus Giessing; Lutz Liefeldt; Kurt Miller; Tom Florian Fuller; T Florian Fuller
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Transition from laparoscopic to retroperitoneoscopic approach for live donor nephrectomy.

Authors:  Zi Qin Ng; Gabrielle Musk; Alethea Rea; Bulang He
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Robotic-assisted vs. laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a retrospective comparison of perioperative course and postoperative outcome after 1 year.

Authors:  Anthony Yang; Naman Barman; Edward Chin; Daniel Herron; Antonios Arvelakis; Dianne LaPointe Rudow; Sander S Florman; Michael A Palese
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-08-31

Review 10.  Chylous ascites requiring surgical intervention after donor nephrectomy: case series and single center experience.

Authors:  J Aerts; A Matas; D Sutherland; R Kandaswamy
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 8.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.