Literature DB >> 14660380

Seasonal changes in the rhizosphere microbial communities associated with field-grown genetically modified canola (Brassica napus).

Kari E Dunfield1, James J Germida.   

Abstract

The introduction of transgenic plants into agricultural ecosystems has raised the question of the ecological impact of these plants on nontarget organisms, such as soil bacteria. Although differences in both the genetic structure and the metabolic function of the microbial communities associated with some transgenic plant lines have been established, it remains to be seen whether these differences have an ecological impact on the soil microbial communities. We conducted a 2-year, multiple-site field study in which rhizosphere samples associated with a transgenic canola variety and a conventional canola variety were sampled at six times throughout the growing season. The objectives of this study were to identify differences between the rhizosphere microbial community associated with the transgenic plants and the rhizosphere microbial community associated with the conventional canola plants and to determine whether the differences were permanent or depended on the presence of the plant. Community-level physiological profiles, fatty acid methyl ester profiles, and terminal amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis profiles of rhizosphere microbial communities were compared to the profiles of the microbial community associated with an unplanted, fallow field plot. Principal-component analysis showed that there was variation in the microbial community associated with both canola variety and growth season. Importantly, while differences between the microbial communities associated with the transgenic plant variety were observed at several times throughout the growing season, all analyses indicated that when the microbial communities were assessed after winter, there were no differences between microbial communities from field plots that contained harvested transgenic canola plants and microbial communities from field plots that did not contain plants during the field season. Hence, the changes in the microbial community structure associated with genetically modified plants were temporary and did not persist into the next field season.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14660380      PMCID: PMC309909          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.12.7310-7318.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  15 in total

1.  Bacterioplankton Community Diversity in a Series of Thermally Stratified Lakes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Use of the T-RFLP technique to assess spatial and temporal changes in the bacterial community structure within an agricultural soil planted with transgenic and non-transgenic potato plants.

Authors: 
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 4.194

3.  The Structure of Microbial Communities in Soil and the Lasting Impact of Cultivation.

Authors:  D.H. Buckley; T.M. Schmidt
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Analysis of the dynamics of bacterial communities in the rhizosphere of the chrysanthemum via denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and substrate utilization patterns

Authors: 
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Determinants of Soil Microbial Communities: Effects of Agricultural Management, Season, and Soil Type on Phospholipid Fatty Acid Profiles

Authors: 
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.552

6.  Characterization of microbial diversity by determining terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms of genes encoding 16S rRNA.

Authors:  W T Liu; T L Marsh; H Cheng; L J Forney
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Molecular microbial diversity of an agricultural soil in Wisconsin.

Authors:  J Borneman; P W Skroch; K M O'Sullivan; J A Palus; N G Rumjanek; J L Jansen; J Nienhuis; E W Triplett
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Bulk and rhizosphere soil bacterial communities studied by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis: plant-dependent enrichment and seasonal shifts revealed.

Authors:  K Smalla; G Wieland; A Buchner; A Zock; J Parzy; S Kaiser; N Roskot; H Heuer; G Berg
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Establishment of introduced antagonistic bacteria in the rhizosphere of transgenic potatoes and their effect on the bacterial community.

Authors:  Jana Lottmann; Holger Heuer; Johann De Vries; Andreas Mahn; Klaus Düring; Wilfried Wackernagel; Kornelia Smalla; Gabriele Berg
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 4.194

10.  Biodiversity of a Burkholderia cepacia population isolated from the maize rhizosphere at different plant growth stages.

Authors:  F Di Cello; A Bevivino; L Chiarini; R Fani; D Paffetti; S Tabacchioni; C Dalmastri
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  29 in total

1.  Distinctive bacterial communities in the rhizoplane of four tropical tree species.

Authors:  Yoon Myung Oh; Mincheol Kim; Larisa Lee-Cruz; Ang Lai-Hoe; Rusea Go; N Ainuddin; Raha Abdul Rahim; Noraini Shukor; Jonathan M Adams
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Impact of Bt corn on rhizospheric and soil eubacterial communities and on beneficial mycorrhizal symbiosis in experimental microcosms.

Authors:  M Castaldini; A Turrini; C Sbrana; A Benedetti; M Marchionni; S Mocali; A Fabiani; S Landi; F Santomassimo; B Pietrangeli; M P Nuti; N Miclaus; M Giovannetti
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Rhizosphere communities of genetically modified zeaxanthin-accumulating potato plants and their parent cultivar differ less than those of different potato cultivars.

Authors:  Nicole Weinert; Remo Meincke; Christine Gottwald; Holger Heuer; Newton C M Gomes; Michael Schloter; Gabriele Berg; Kornelia Smalla
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  A case study for assessment of microbial community dynamics in genetically modified Bt cotton crop fields.

Authors:  Manisha Kapur; Ranjana Bhatia; Gunjan Pandey; Janmejay Pandey; Debarati Paul; Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-23       Impact factor: 2.188

5.  Do genetically modified plants impact arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi?

Authors:  Wenke Liu
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  Effect of genetically modified poplars on soil microbial communities during the phytoremediation of waste mine tailings.

Authors:  Moonsuk Hur; Yongho Kim; Hae-Ryong Song; Jong Min Kim; Young Im Choi; Hana Yi
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Huanglongbing, a systemic disease, restructures the bacterial community associated with citrus roots.

Authors:  Pankaj Trivedi; Yongping Duan; Nian Wang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 8.  Will transgenic plants adversely affect the environment?

Authors:  Vassili V Velkov; Alexander B Medvinsky; Mikhail S Sokolov; Anatoly I Marchenko
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Impact of the ahas transgene and of herbicides associated with the soybean crop on soil microbial communities.

Authors:  Rosinei Aparecida Souza; Letícia Carlos Babujia; Adriana Pereira Silva; Maria de Fátima Guimarães; Carlos Arrabal Arias; Mariangela Hungria
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 2.788

10.  Changes in root bacterial communities associated to two different development stages of canola (Brassica napus L. var oleifera) evaluated through next-generation sequencing technology.

Authors:  Samanta B de Campos; Jung-Won Youn; Roberto Farina; Sebastian Jaenicke; Sebastian Jünemann; Rafael Szczepanowski; Anelise Beneduzi; Luciano K Vargas; Alexander Goesmann; Volker F Wendisch; Luciane M P Passaglia
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 4.552

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.