Literature DB >> 14645951

From legitimate consumers to public relations pawns: the tobacco industry and young Australians.

S M Carter1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To document the Australian tobacco industry's activities regarding youth smoking to support tobacco control.
METHOD: 492 industry documents from primary and secondary websites were abstracted and analysed.
RESULTS: Australian legislation and rhetoric on youth and tobacco has changed dramatically over the last 50 years, from an unproblematic association of teenagers and smoking in the 1960s, through the industry's aggressive attacks and denials in the 1980s, to the 1990s, when industry became newly compliant with "societal expectations" and youth became a dominant bargaining issue in the industry's public relations strategy. The industry's current policy is to simultaneously blame others for underage smoking, frame the industry as socially responsible via voluntary marketing codes, youth access programmes, and school education, and market actively to young adults.
CONCLUSIONS: The arbitrary distinction between 17 and 18 year olds is, particularly in Australia's dark market, a liability for tobacco control and an opportunity for the industry, which is attempting to claim the high moral ground traditionally occupied by tobacco control on the youth issue. The current review of Australia's Tobacco Advertising Prohibition Act of 1992 should prohibit all forms of industry communication targeting young people, including retail access and schools programmes and below-the-line marketing. Tobacco control advocacy should highlight the industry's attempts to use the youth issue in its own favour while laying the blame elsewhere.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14645951      PMCID: PMC1766123          DOI: 10.1136/tc.12.suppl_3.iii71

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  25 in total

Review 1.  Why we should tackle adult smoking first.

Authors:  D Hill
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  The Florida "truth" anti-tobacco media evaluation: design, first year results, and implications for planning future state media evaluations.

Authors:  D F Sly; G R Heald; S Ray
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  It is time to abandon youth access tobacco programmes.

Authors:  P M Ling; A Landman; S A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Marketing to America's youth: evidence from corporate documents.

Authors:  K M Cummings; C P Morley; J K Horan; C Steger; N-R Leavell
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Getting to the truth: evaluating national tobacco countermarketing campaigns.

Authors:  Matthew C Farrelly; Cheryl G Healton; Kevin C Davis; Peter Messeri; James C Hersey; M Lyndon Haviland
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Tobacco industry youth smoking prevention programs: protecting the industry and hurting tobacco control.

Authors:  Anne Landman; Pamela M Ling; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Anti-tobacco advertisements by Massachusetts and Philip Morris: what teenagers think.

Authors:  Lois Biener
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  Targeting youth and concerned smokers: evidence from Canadian tobacco industry documents.

Authors:  R W Pollay
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  Hutchinson Smoking Prevention Project: long-term randomized trial in school-based tobacco use prevention--results on smoking.

Authors:  A V Peterson; K A Kealey; S L Mann; P M Marek; I G Sarason
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-12-20       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  The tobacco industry and underage youth smoking: tobacco industry documents from the Minnesota litigation.

Authors:  C L Perry
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  1999-09
View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  The vector of the tobacco epidemic: tobacco industry practices in low and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Sungkyu Lee; Pamela M Ling; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  "Stay away from them until you're old enough to make a decision": tobacco company testimony about youth smoking initiation.

Authors:  Melanie Wakefield; Kim McLeod; Cheryl L Perry
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Project Cerberus: tobacco industry strategy to create an alternative to the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.

Authors:  Hadii M Mamudu; Ross Hammond; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  The rise and fall of tobacco control media campaigns, 1967 2006.

Authors:  Jennifer K Ibrahim; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Attempts to undermine tobacco control: tobacco industry "youth smoking prevention" programs to undermine meaningful tobacco control in Latin America.

Authors:  Ernesto M Sebrié; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 6.  Cooperation and control: the Tobacco Institute of Australia.

Authors:  S M Carter
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 7.  How does the tobacco industry attempt to influence marketing regulations? A systematic review.

Authors:  Emily Savell; Anna B Gilmore; Gary Fooks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Zonnic®: a new player in an old field.

Authors:  Min Gong; Michael S Dunbar; Claude Setodji; William G Shadel
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2017-09-06

9.  Distilling the curriculum: An analysis of alcohol industry-funded school-based youth education programmes.

Authors:  May C I van Schalkwyk; Mark Petticrew; Nason Maani; Ben Hawkins; Chris Bonell; Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi; Cécile Knai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 3.752

10.  A critical evaluation of the volume, relevance and quality of evidence submitted by the tobacco industry to oppose standardised packaging of tobacco products.

Authors:  Jenny L Hatchard; Gary J Fooks; Karen A Evans-Reeves; Selda Ulucanlar; Anna B Gilmore
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.