Literature DB >> 12036777

Tobacco industry youth smoking prevention programs: protecting the industry and hurting tobacco control.

Anne Landman1, Pamela M Ling, Stanton A Glantz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This report describes the history, true goals, and effects of tobacco industry-sponsored youth smoking prevention programs.
METHODS: We analyzed previously-secret tobacco industry documents.
RESULTS: The industry started these programs in the 1980s to forestall legislation that would restrict industry activities. Industry programs portray smoking as an adult choice and fail to discuss how tobacco advertising promotes smoking or the health dangers of smoking. The industry has used these programs to fight taxes, clean-indoor-air laws, and marketing restrictions worldwide. There is no evidence that these programs decrease smoking among youths.
CONCLUSIONS: Tobacco industry youth programs do more harm than good for tobacco control. The tobacco industry should not be allowed to run or directly fund youth smoking prevention programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12036777      PMCID: PMC1447482          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.92.6.917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  29 in total

1.  Who's afraid of the truth?

Authors:  C Healton
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Simulated effect of tobacco tax variation on population health in California.

Authors:  R M Kaplan; C F Ake; S L Emery; A M Navarro
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Attitudes toward secondhand smoke, smoking, and quitting among young people.

Authors:  S A Glantz; P Jamieson
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 4.  Macro-social influences: the effects of prices and tobacco-control policies on the demand for tobacco products.

Authors:  F J Chaloupka
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  A day in the life of an advertising man: review of internal documents from the UK tobacco industry's principal advertising agencies.

Authors:  G Hastings; L MacFadyen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-08-05

6.  Marketing to America's youth: evidence from corporate documents.

Authors:  K M Cummings; C P Morley; J K Horan; C Steger; N-R Leavell
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Tobacco industry documents: treasure trove or quagmire?

Authors:  R E Malone; E D Balbach
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  Smoking by young people. Philip morris USA also wants to reduce incidence of smoking by young people.

Authors:  C Levy
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-11-06

9.  Targeting youth and concerned smokers: evidence from Canadian tobacco industry documents.

Authors:  R W Pollay
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  Home smoking restrictions: which smokers have them and how they are associated with smoking behavior.

Authors:  E A Gilpin; M M White; A J Farkas; J P Pierce
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.244

View more
  75 in total

1.  What's a cigarette company to do?

Authors:  Kenneth E Warner
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Through tobacco industry eyes: civil society and the FCTC process from Philip Morris and British American Tobacco's perspectives.

Authors:  Mariaelena Gonzalez; Lawrence W Green; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Global Fund needs to address conflict of interest.

Authors:  Anna B Gilmore; Gary Fooks
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 9.408

4.  "What Is Our Story?" Philip Morris's Changing Corporate Narrative.

Authors:  Patricia A McDaniel; Ruth E Malone
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Tobacco industry success in Costa Rica: the importance of FCTC article 5.3.

Authors:  Eric Crosbie; Ernesto M Sebrié; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Salud Publica Mex       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb

Review 6.  Industry sponsored youth smoking prevention programme in Malaysia: a case study in duplicity.

Authors:  M Assunta; S Chapman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  The most important and influential papers in tobacco control: results of an online poll.

Authors:  S Chapman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  German tobacco industry's successful efforts to maintain scientific and political respectability to prevent regulation of secondhand smoke.

Authors:  A Bornhäuser; J McCarthy; S A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  Industry sponsored anti-smoking ads and adolescent reactance: test of a boomerang effect.

Authors:  L Henriksen; A L Dauphinee; Y Wang; S P Fortmann
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  Tobacco industry attempts to counter the World Bank report Curbing the Epidemic and obstruct the WHO framework convention on tobacco control.

Authors:  Hadii M Mamudu; Ross Hammond; Stanton Glantz
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 4.634

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.