Literature DB >> 17600257

The rise and fall of tobacco control media campaigns, 1967 2006.

Jennifer K Ibrahim1, Stanton A Glantz.   

Abstract

Extensive research has demonstrated that public education through media campaigns is an effective means to reduce smoking prevalence and tobacco consumption. Aggressive media campaigns that confront the tobacco industry's deceptive practices are most effective and are therefore a prime target for attack. The tobacco industry has attacked public tobacco control media campaigns since 1967, when the first public tobacco control media advertisements ran. Through studying tobacco control media campaigns in Arizona, California, Florida, Massachusetts, Minnesota, and Oregon, and of the American Legacy Foundation, we identified industry strategies to prevent a campaign's creation, limit the target audience and the content of the messages, limit or eliminate the campaign's funding, and pursue litigation against the campaigns. Tobacco control advocates must learn from the past and continue to confront the tobacco industry and its third-party allies to defend antitobacco media campaigns or, despite evidence of their effectiveness, they will be eliminated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17600257      PMCID: PMC1931454          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.097006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  32 in total

Review 1.  The passage and initial implementation of Oregon's Measure 44.

Authors:  L K Goldman; S A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  The Florida "truth" anti-tobacco media evaluation: design, first year results, and implications for planning future state media evaluations.

Authors:  D F Sly; G R Heald; S Ray
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  The strategy behind Florida's "truth" campaign.

Authors:  J J Hicks
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 4.  Boards of Health as venues for clean indoor air policy making.

Authors:  Joanna V Dearlove; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Trends in pregnancy rates for the United States, 1976-97: an update.

Authors:  S J Ventura; W D Mosher; S C Curtin; J C Abma; S Henshaw
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2001-06-06

6.  Evolution of a comprehensive tobacco control programme: building system capacity and strategic partnerships--lessons from Massachusetts.

Authors:  H Robbins; M Krakow
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Failure to defend a successful state tobacco control program: policy lessons from Florida.

Authors:  M S Givel; S A Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Changes in youth cigarette use and intentions following implementation of a tobacco control program: findings from the Florida Youth Tobacco Survey, 1998-2000.

Authors:  U E Bauer; T M Johnson; R S Hopkins; R G Brooks
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-08-09       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Tobacco industry allegations of "illegal lobbying" and state tobacco control.

Authors:  S A Bialous; B J Fox; S A Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Tobacco lobby political influence on US state legislatures in the 1990s.

Authors:  M S Givel; S A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 7.552

View more
  22 in total

1.  Component analysis of a school-based substance use prevention program in Spain: contributions of problem solving and social skills training content.

Authors:  José P Espada; Kenneth W Griffin; Juan R Pereira; Mireia Orgilés; José M García-Fernández
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2012-02

2.  Local smoke-free ordinances are passing in tobacco-growing states.

Authors:  Sarah Sullivan; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Corporate philanthropy, lobbying, and public health policy.

Authors:  Laura E Tesler; Ruth E Malone
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Content characteristics driving the diffusion of antismoking messages: implications for cancer prevention in the emerging public communication environment.

Authors:  Hyun Suk Kim; Sungkyoung Lee; Joseph N Cappella; Lisa Vera; Sherry Emery
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2013-12

5.  Do we believe the tobacco industry lied to us? Association with smoking behavior in a military population.

Authors:  Robert C Klesges; Deborah A Sherrill-Mittleman; Margaret Debon; G Wayne Talcott; Robert J Vanecek
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2009-06-15

6.  Pushing secondhand smoke and the tobacco industry outside the social norm to reduce adolescent smoking.

Authors:  Anna V Song; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 5.012

7.  Strong tobacco control program requirements and secure funding are not enough: lessons from Florida.

Authors:  Allison Kennedy; Sarah Sullivan; Yogi Hendlin; Richard Barnes; Stanton Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Logistic Regression with Multiple Random Effects: A Simulation Study of Estimation Methods and Statistical Packages.

Authors:  Yoonsang Kim; Young-Ku Choi; Sherry Emery
Journal:  Am Stat       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 8.710

9.  A framework for developing an evidence-based, comprehensive tobacco control program.

Authors:  Laura Rosen; Elliot Rosenberg; Martin McKee; Shosh Gan-Noy; Diane Levin; Elana Mayshar; Galia Shacham; John Borowski; Gabi Bin Nun; Boaz Lev
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2010-05-27

10.  Changes in youth cigarette use following the dismantling of an antitobacco media campaign in Florida.

Authors:  Noella A Dietz; Lori Westphal; Kris L Arheart; David J Lee; Youjie Huang; David F Sly; Evelyn Davila
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 2.830

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.