Literature DB >> 14643428

The S-phase checkpoint and its regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Maria Pia Longhese1, Michela Clerici, Giovanna Lucchini.   

Abstract

Cells are never more vulnerable than during DNA replication, which represents a major moment of potential genetic instability. Genotoxic insults induce many different forms of DNA damage that may interfere with the ability of cells to properly duplicate their genome. Primary damage may in turn undergo structural transformations during DNA replication, thus generating secondary lesions that may be even more dangerous. Cells experiencing replication of damaged DNA or replication blocks activate an S-phase checkpoint response that assures the fidelity and completion of DNA replication before cells enter M-phase. The S-phase checkpoint pathway regulates not only progress through the cell cycle but also DNA repair and DNA replication itself.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14643428     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2003.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  38 in total

1.  The contribution of the S-phase checkpoint genes MEC1 and SGS1 to genome stability maintenance in Candida albicans.

Authors:  Melanie Legrand; Christine L Chan; Peter A Jauert; David T Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Fungal Genet Biol       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.495

Review 2.  Multiple pathways process stalled replication forks.

Authors:  Bénédicte Michel; Gianfranco Grompone; Maria-Jose Florès; Vladimir Bidnenko
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Replication checkpoint kinase Cds1 regulates Mus81 to preserve genome integrity during replication stress.

Authors:  Mihoko Kai; Michael N Boddy; Paul Russell; Teresa S-F Wang
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2 protein negatively regulates DNA damage checkpoint signalling.

Authors:  Michela Clerici; Davide Mantiero; Giovanna Lucchini; Maria Pia Longhese
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  Genome-wide analysis of cellular response to bacterial genotoxin CdtB in yeast.

Authors:  Takao Kitagawa; Hisashi Hoshida; Rinji Akada
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  Diverse roles for histone H2A modifications in DNA damage response pathways in yeast.

Authors:  John D Moore; Oya Yazgan; Yeganeh Ataian; Jocelyn E Krebs
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-10-08       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Phosphorylation by casein kinase 2 regulates Nap1 localization and function.

Authors:  Meredith E K Calvert; Kristin M Keck; Celeste Ptak; Jeffrey Shabanowitz; Donald F Hunt; Lucy F Pemberton
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-12-17       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  The stress-activated protein kinase Hog1 mediates S phase delay in response to osmostress.

Authors:  Gilad Yaakov; Alba Duch; María García-Rubio; Josep Clotet; Javier Jimenez; Andrés Aguilera; Francesc Posas
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 4.138

9.  Uncovering novel cell cycle players through the inactivation of securin in budding yeast.

Authors:  Sumeet Sarin; Karen E Ross; Lorrie Boucher; Yvette Green; Mike Tyers; Orna Cohen-Fix
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  A mutation in Dbf4 motif M impairs interactions with DNA replication factors and confers increased resistance to genotoxic agents.

Authors:  Angela E Varrin; Ajai A Prasad; Rolf-Peter Scholz; Matthew D Ramer; Bernard P Duncker
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.