Literature DB >> 14634739

[Navigation of tumors and metastases in the area of the thoraco-lumbar spine].

F Gebhard1, L Kinzl, E Hartwig, M Arand.   

Abstract

In this clinical feasibility study, CT-based verification of the efficacy of navigated decompression and pedicle screw placement in patients who had tumor-related posterior surgery was demonstrated. Eighty-six percent of the pedicle screws were positioned centrally in the bone without perforation; in all patients accurate decompression was seen. The accuracy of transpedicle screw implantation postoperatively was investigated with CT. In contrast to other published studies, no postoperative neurologic deterioration was seen in the patients as a result of using computer-aided surgical procedures. At the same time we were able to achieve complete decompression of the neural structures for radiologic and neurologic findings. Because of inaccurate registration, it was not possible to use computer-aided implantation surgery for 15% of the pedicles and, therefore, a conventional fluoroscopic approach was used. Our initial results indicate that computer-aided frameless navigation of tumor surgery of the spine is a safe technique which improves surgical performance during posterior decompression and transpedicle stabilization. In addition, CAS surgery improved the intraoperative information about the tumor and the current surgical intervention during decompression. Nevertheless the technique should be used only by experienced surgeons who can, if required, continue the operation using conventional techniques. Furthermore, the surgeon should have a complete theoretical understanding of the navigation system to minimize possible misinterpretation of computer guidance information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14634739     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-003-0684-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  27 in total

1.  Computer-assisted spine surgery.

Authors:  P Merloz; J Tonetti; L Pittet; M Coulomb; S Lavallée; J Troccaz; P Cinquin; P Sautot
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  1998

2.  Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Part II: An anatomical and radiographic assessment.

Authors:  A R Vaccaro; S J Rizzolo; R A Balderston; T J Allardyce; S R Garfin; C Dolinskas; H S An
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Accuracy of computer-assisted pedicle screw placement. An in vivo computed tomography analysis.

Authors:  O Schwarzenbach; U Berlemann; B Jost; H Visarius; E Arm; F Langlotz; L P Nolte; C Ozdoba
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Frameless stereotactic guided neurosurgery: clinical experience with an infrared based pointer device navigation system.

Authors:  K Roessler; K Ungersboeck; W Dietrich; M Aichholzer; K Hittmeir; C Matula; T Czech; W T Koos
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.216

5.  Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in lumbar vertebrae.

Authors:  W H Castro; H Halm; J Jerosch; J Malms; J Steinbeck; S Blasius
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Comparative results between conventional and computer-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine.

Authors:  L P Amiot; K Lang; M Putzier; H Zippel; H Labelle
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  [Osteosynthesis of dorsal, lumbar, and lumbosacral spine with metallic plates screwed into vertebral pedicles and articular apophyses].

Authors:  R Roy-Camille; M Roy-Camille; C Demeulenaere
Journal:  Presse Med       Date:  1970-06       Impact factor: 1.228

8.  The placement of lumbar pedicle screws using computerised stereotactic guidance.

Authors:  F P Girardi; F P Cammisa; H S Sandhu; L Alvarez
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1999-09

9.  Complication, survival rates, and risk factors of surgery for metastatic disease of the spine.

Authors:  J J Wise; J S Fischgrund; H N Herkowitz; D Montgomery; L T Kurz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Results of spinal arthrodesis with pedicle screw-plate fixation.

Authors:  J L West; D S Bradford; J W Ogilvie
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  4 in total

1.  O-arm(®)-based spinal navigation and intraoperative 3D-imaging: first experiences.

Authors:  O Gonschorek; S Hauck; U Spiegl; T Weiß; R Pätzold; V Bühren
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 2.  Image-guided spine surgery: state of the art and future directions.

Authors:  Thorsten Tjardes; Sven Shafizadeh; Dieter Rixen; Thomas Paffrath; Bertil Bouillon; Eva S Steinhausen; Holger Baethis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Image-guidance technology and the surgical resection of spinal column tumors.

Authors:  Bhargav Desai; Jonathan Hobbs; Grant Hartung; Guoren Xu; Ziya L Gokaslan; Andreas Linninger; Ankit I Mehta
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Navigation-assisted surgery for tumors of the spine.

Authors:  S Bandiera; R Ghermandi; A Gasbarrini; G Barbanti Bròdano; S Colangeli; S Boriani
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.134

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.