Literature DB >> 10515021

Complication, survival rates, and risk factors of surgery for metastatic disease of the spine.

J J Wise1, J S Fischgrund, H N Herkowitz, D Montgomery, L T Kurz.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: The risk factors for complications and complication and survival rates in patients with metastatic disease of the spine were reviewed. A retrospective study was performed.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the surgical complication and survival rates of patients with metastatic disease of the spine and risk factors for complication occurrence. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The role of surgical intervention for patients with metastatic disease of the spine has been controversial. Several risk factors for surgical complications have been identified. Short survival times and high complication rates have failed to justify surgical intervention in many cases.
METHODS: Patients (n = 80) undergoing surgical treatment for metastatic disease of the spine were reviewed. Surgical indications included progressive neurologic deficit, neurologic deficit failing to respond to, or progressing after, radiation treatment; intractable pain; radioresistant tumors; or the need for histologic diagnosis. Patients underwent anterior, posterior, or combined decompression and stabilization procedures. Neurologic examination was recorded before surgery, postoperative period, and at least follow-up. Complication and survival rates were calculated. Several variables were examined for risk of complication.
RESULTS: The mean age at time of surgery was 55.6 years (range, 20-84 years). Mean survival time after the diagnosis of spinal metastasis was 26.0 months (range, 1-107.25 months). Mean survival time after surgery was 15.9 months (range, 0.25-55.5 months). Sixty-five patients showed no change in Frankel grade, 19 improved one Frankel grade, and 1 deteriorated one Frankel grade; 1 patient had paraplegia. Thirty-five complications occurred in 20 patients (25.0%). Ten patients (12.5%) had multiple complications accounting for 23 of the 35 postoperative problems (65.7%). Sixty patients had no surgical complications (75%). There were no intraoperative deaths.
CONCLUSIONS: The likelihood that a complication occurred was significantly related to Harrington classifications demonstrating significant neurologic deficits and the use of preoperative radiation therapy. In general, Harrington classifications with neurologic deficits and lower Frankel grades before and after surgery were associated with an increased risk of complication. Overall, the major complication rate was relatively low, and minor complications were successfully treated with minimal morbidity. The relatively long survival time after spinal surgery in this group of patients justifies surgical treatment for metastatic disease. Most complications occurred in a small percentage of patients. To minimize complications, patients must be carefully selected based on expected length of survival, the use of radiation therapy, presence of neurologic deficit, and impending spinal instability or collapse caused by bone destruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10515021     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199909150-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  63 in total

1.  Clinical practice guidelines: breast cancer pain.

Authors:  Marcel Dvorak; Charles G Fisher
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-07-09       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  En bloc spondylectomy reconstructions in a biomechanical in-vitro study.

Authors:  A C Disch; K D Schaser; I Melcher; A Luzzati; F Feraboli; W Schmoelz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  [Prognosis scores for spinal metastases].

Authors:  N H von der Höh; J Gulow; S K Tschöke; A Völker; C E Heyde
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Minimal-invasive stabilization and circumferential spinal cord decompression in metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC).

Authors:  Nils Hansen-Algenstaedt; Reginald Knight; Jörg Beyerlein; Roland Gessler; Lothar Wiesner; Christian Schaefer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Factors influencing early postoperative complications following surgery for symptomatic spinal metastasis: a single-center series and multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Patrick Schuss; Ági Güresir; Matthias Schneider; Markus Velten; Hartmut Vatter; Erdem Güresir
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 6.  Review of metastatic spine tumour classification and indications for surgery: the consensus statement of the Global Spine Tumour Study Group.

Authors:  David Choi; A Crockard; C Bunger; J Harms; N Kawahara; C Mazel; R Melcher; K Tomita
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Risk factors for surgical site infection after posterior fixation surgery and intraoperative radiotherapy for spinal metastases.

Authors:  Shurei Sugita; Takahiro Hozumi; Kiyofumi Yamakawa; Takahiro Goto; Taiji Kondo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Does surgical site infection influence neurological outcome and survival in patients undergoing surgery for metastatic spinal cord compression?

Authors:  N A Quraishi; M S Ahmed; G Arealis; B M Boszczyk; K L Edwards
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Survival, complications and outcome in 282 patients operated for neurological deficit due to thoracic or lumbar spinal metastases.

Authors:  Karl-Ake Jansson; Henrik C F Bauer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Predictors for surgical complications of en bloc resections in the spine: review of 220 cases treated by the same team.

Authors:  Stefano Boriani; Alessandro Gasbarrini; Stefano Bandiera; Riccardo Ghermandi; Ran Lador
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.