| Literature DB >> 20109219 |
Matías S Mora1, Fernando J Mapelli, Oscar E Gaggiotti, Marcelo J Kittlein, Enrique P Lessa.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The population genetic structure of subterranean rodent species is strongly affected by demographic (e.g. rates of dispersal and social structure) and stochastic factors (e.g. random genetic drift among subpopulations and habitat fragmentation). In particular, gene flow estimates at different spatial scales are essential to understand genetic differentiation among populations of a species living in a highly fragmented landscape. Ctenomys australis (the sand dune tuco-tuco) is a territorial subterranean rodent that inhabits a relatively secure, permanently sealed burrow system, occurring in sand dune habitats on the coastal landscape in the south-east of Buenos Aires province, Argentina. Currently, this habitat is threatened by urban development and forestry and, therefore, the survival of this endemic species is at risk. Here, we assess population genetic structure and patterns of dispersal among individuals of this species at different spatial scales using 8 polymorphic microsatellite loci. Furthermore, we evaluate the relative importance of sex and habitat configuration in modulating the dispersal patterns at these geographical scales.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20109219 PMCID: PMC2828403 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-11-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genet ISSN: 1471-2156 Impact factor: 2.797
Figure 1Geographic distribution of . Squares over the map show the surface of each of the three sample sites (Western, Central and Eastern) and their individual points of capture within them (black circles: individuals pertaining to the Western genetic cluster; white circles: individuals pertaining to the Eastern genetic cluster; lines: extra-cluster immigrants; triangles: ambiguous individuals).
Microsatellite genetic variation in C. australis.
| Eastern | Central | Western | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 3 | 0.1 | 0.09 | 1 | -- | -- | 2 | 0.21 | 0.19 | |
| 6 | 5 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 6 | 0.85 | 0.76 | 6 | 0.69 | 0.76 | |
| 6 | 6 | 0.69 | 0.62 | 4 | 0.46 | 0.48 | 5 | 0.6 | 0.71 | |
| 5 | 4 | 0.37 | 0.35 | 3 | 0.54 | 0.43 | 3 | 0.4 | 0.33 | |
| 4 | 4 | 0.66 | 3 | 0.85 | 0.65 | 3 | 0.73 | 0.59 | ||
| 6 | 6 | 0.61 | 3 | 0.62 | 0.45 | 5 | 0.63 | 0.53 | ||
| 5 | 4 | 0.75 | 0.65 | 5 | 0.62 | 0.58 | 4 | 0.65 | ||
| 3 | 3 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 2 | 0.23 | 0.21 | 2 | 0.38 | 0.41 | |
| 0.61 | 0.53 | 0.6 | 0.51 | 0.56 | 0.52 | |||||
| 4.75 | 4.38 | 3.38 | 3.75 | |||||||
| 100 | 87.5 | 100 | ||||||||
| 28 | 7 | 17 | ||||||||
| 23 | 6 | 31 | ||||||||
| 4 | 2 | 7 | ||||||||
| 47 | 11 | 41 | ||||||||
| 51 | 13 | 48 | ||||||||
Number of alleles per locus (At), number of alleles per population (Ni), observed heterozygosity (Ho) and expected heterozygosity (He) by locus for each geographical sample (Eastern, Central and Western). --, Monomorphic; Mean, average over eight loci; A, average number of alleles (allelic richness); %P, percentage of polymorphic loci. N♂, male sample size; N♀, female sample size; NSSA, smaller subadults sample size (between 160 to 210 g); NSA-A, larger subadults and adults sample size (bigger than 210 g); NT, total sample size. All individuals belong to a post-dispersal age [8,11]. Significant deviations between observed and expected levels of heterozygosity in each geographical sample and locus by locus are shown. * 0.001 < P < 0.05; and ** P < 0.001.
Microsatellite allele frequencies across loci and sampling sites.
| Locus/alleles | Sampling sites | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Eastern | Central | Western | |
| 1 | 0.029 | 0.000 | 0.104 |
| 2 | 0.951 | 1.000 | 0.896 |
| 3 | 0.020 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| 1 | 0.078 | 0.038 | 0.125 |
| 2 | 0.255 | 0.192 | 0.219 |
| 3 | 0.059 | 0.115 | 0.125 |
| 4 | 0.304 | 0.308 | 0.385 |
| 5 | 0.304 | 0.308 | 0.115 |
| 6 | 0.000 | 0.038 | 0.031 |
| 1 | 0.029 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| 2 | 0.157 | 0.192 | 0.177 |
| 3 | 0.088 | 0.038 | 0.115 |
| 4 | 0.069 | 0.077 | 0.125 |
| 5 | 0.578 | 0.692 | 0.469 |
| 6 | 0.078 | 0.000 | 0.115 |
| 1 | 0.147 | 0.154 | 0.000 |
| 2 | 0.049 | 0.115 | 0.177 |
| 3 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.021 |
| 4 | 0.010 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| 5 | 0.794 | 0.731 | 0.802 |
| 1 | 0.235 | 0.308 | 0.104 |
| 2 | 0.412 | 0.423 | 0.448 |
| 3 | 0.343 | 0.269 | 0.448 |
| 4 | 0.010 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| 1 | 0.069 | 0.000 | 0.073 |
| 2 | 0.029 | 0.038 | 0.000 |
| 3 | 0.539 | 0.692 | 0.646 |
| 4 | 0.020 | 0.000 | 0.021 |
| 5 | 0.294 | 0.269 | 0.219 |
| 6 | 0.049 | 0.000 | 0.042 |
| 1 | 0.000 | 0.115 | 0.198 |
| 2 | 0.010 | 0.038 | 0.281 |
| 3 | 0.353 | 0.077 | 0.042 |
| 4 | 0.431 | 0.615 | 0.479 |
| 5 | 0.206 | 0.154 | 0.000 |
| 1 | 0.069 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| 2 | 0.392 | 0.885 | 0.708 |
| 3 | 0.539 | 0.115 | 0.292 |
Genetic differentiation in Ctenomys australis.
| Population pairwise comparisons | Eastern sample | Central sample | Western sample | Local |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| --- | 0.053* (9.5) | 0.059* (8.53) | 0.0604 | |
| 0.051* | --- | 0.029* (17.28) | 0.0814 | |
| 0.057* | 0.029* | --- | 0.100 | |
Weir & Cockerham ([45]; below the diagonal) and Slatkin ([46]; above the diagonal) FST values for pairwise comparisons. Effective numbers of migrants per generation (Nm, according to Slatkin method) are also reported in parentheses above the diagonal. * P < 0.05. Local FST express local differentiation in relation to the whole population as described by Foll & Gaggiotti [47].
Figure 2Posterior assignment probabilities. Assignment probabilities (Q) to Western (dark grey) and Eastern (white) genetic clusters (K = 2), derived from the STRUCTURE analysis. Each individual is represented by a vertical bar.
Figure 3Inference of genetic clusters (K) from . The log-likelihood values (points) based on the STRUCTURE algorithm, for each 6 independent runs to the whole data set (n = 112) are also shown. The black arrow shows the best clustering solution.
Figure 4Spatial autocorrelation analyses. Spatial genetic structure autocorrelograms for females and males from the Western (A and B, respectively) and females and males from the Eastern sampling sites (C and D, respectively) showing the genetic correlation coefficient (r) as a function of geographical distance (only four distance classes of 80 meters each one are represented). The 95% confidence intervals for the autocorrelation coefficients (r) are also shown (broken line).