Literature DB >> 14627660

Hemispheric differences in the relationship between corticomotor excitability changes following a fine-motor task and motor learning.

Michael I Garry1, Gary Kamen, Michael A Nordstrom.   

Abstract

Motor performance induces a postexercise increase in corticomotor excitability that may be associated with motor learning. We investigated whether there are hemispheric differences in the extent and/or time course of changes in corticomotor excitability following a manipulation task (Purdue pegboard) and their relationship with motor performance. Single- and paired-pulse (3 ms) transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to assess task-induced facilitation of the muscle evoked potential (MEP) and intracortical inhibition (ICI) for three intrinsic hand muscles acting on digits 1, 2, and 5. Fifteen right-handed subjects performed three 30-s pegboard trials with left or right hand in separate sessions. TMS was applied to contralateral motor cortex before and after performance. Number of pegs placed was higher with the right hand, and performance improved (motor learning) with both hands over the three trials. MEP facilitation following performance was short-lasting (<15 min), selective for muscles engaged in gripping the pegs, and of similar magnitude in left and right hands. ICI was reduced immediately following performance with the right hand, but not the left. The extent of MEP facilitation was positively correlated with motor learning for the right hand only. We conclude that the pegboard task induces a selective, short-lasting change in excitability of corticospinal neurons controlling intrinsic hand muscles engaged in the task. Only left hemisphere changes were related to motor learning. This asymmetry may reflect different behavioral strategies for performance improvement with left and right upper limb in this task or hemispheric differences in the control of skilled hand movements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14627660     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00595.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  38 in total

1.  Hemispheric differences in use-dependent corticomotor plasticity in young and old adults.

Authors:  John Cirillo; Nigel C Rogasch; John G Semmler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Extensive training of elementary finger tapping movements changes the pattern of motor cortex excitability.

Authors:  S Koeneke; K Lutz; U Herwig; U Ziemann; L Jäncke
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Afferent stimulation facilitates performance on a novel motor task.

Authors:  M N McDonnell; M C Ridding
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  One hour of tongue-task training is associated with plasticity in corticomotor control of the human tongue musculature.

Authors:  P Svensson; A Romaniello; K Wang; L Arendt-Nielsen; B J Sessle
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-18       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Sustained increase of somatosensory cortex excitability by tactile coactivation studied by paired median nerve stimulation in humans correlates with perceptual gain.

Authors:  Oliver Höffken; Mathias Veit; Frauke Knossalla; Silke Lissek; Barbara Bliem; Patrick Ragert; Hubert R Dinse; Martin Tegenthoff
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  The effect of test TMS intensity on short-interval intracortical inhibition in different excitability states.

Authors:  M I Garry; R H S Thomson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Changes in motor cortex excitability following training of a novel goal-directed motor task.

Authors:  Eugen Gallasch; Monica Christova; Matthias Krenn; Andon Kossev; Dietmar Rafolt
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Kinematics of arm joint rotations in cerebellar and unskilled subjects associated with the inability to throw fast.

Authors:  Dagmar Timmann; Paul Lee; Sherry Watts; Jon Hore
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.847

9.  Cortical effects of repetitive finger flexion- vs. extension-resisted tracking movements: a TMS study.

Authors:  Sasha B Godfrey; Peter S Lum; Evan Chan; Michelle L Harris-Love
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Can short-term oral fine motor training affect precision of task performance and induce cortical plasticity of the jaw muscles?

Authors:  Hong Zhang; Abhishek Kumar; Mohit Kothari; Xiaoping Luo; Mats Trulsson; Krister G Svensson; Peter Svensson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.