Literature DB >> 16328288

Afferent stimulation facilitates performance on a novel motor task.

M N McDonnell1, M C Ridding.   

Abstract

Training on a motor task results in performance improvements that are accompanied by increases in motor cortex excitability. Moreover, periods of afferent stimulation result in increased motor cortex excitability. There is increasing evidence to suggest that raised motor cortical excitability may facilitate movement and learning. Here we examined whether a period of electrical stimulation of hand afferents ("associative stimulation"), known to increase motor cortex excitability, facilitated the performance of a complex sensorimotor task. Three groups of nine normal subjects participated in these studies. All subjects were trained on the grooved pegboard test (GPT). Training consisted of three blocks, each of five trials, of placing pegs as quickly as possible. The time to complete each block was recorded. One group of subjects had a 1-h period of associative stimulation prior to training on the GPT. A second group received non-associative stimulation (which does not change cortical excitability) of the same hand afferents while a third group received no stimulation prior to training. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and abductor digiti minimus (ADM) muscles both prior to and following stimulation and performance of the GPT. In contrast to non-associative stimulation, associative stimulation increased motor cortical excitability, as evidenced by an increase in the amplitude of MEPs evoked in the FDI, one of the stimulated muscles, but not the ADM. Training on the GPT resulted in significant improvements in the time taken to complete the task for all three groups. However, in subjects who had preconditioning associative stimulation, performance on the GPT improved more rapidly. Additionally, there was a strong trend for the improvement in the performance of the stimulated group to be greater than that of the control group. The results of the present study suggest that increased motor cortical excitability, induced by associative stimulation, may facilitate the performance of a novel complex sensorimotor task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16328288     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0192-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  22 in total

1.  Role of the human motor cortex in rapid motor learning.

Authors:  W Muellbacher; U Ziemann; B Boroojerdi; L Cohen; M Hallett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Changes in muscle responses to stimulation of the motor cortex induced by peripheral nerve stimulation in human subjects.

Authors:  M C Ridding; B Brouwer; T S Miles; J B Pitcher; P D Thompson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Facilitation of implicit motor learning by weak transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in the human.

Authors:  Michael A Nitsche; Astrid Schauenburg; Nicolas Lang; David Liebetanz; Cornelia Exner; Walter Paulus; Frithjof Tergau
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Mechanisms of enhancement of human motor cortex excitability induced by interventional paired associative stimulation.

Authors:  Katja Stefan; Erwin Kunesch; Reiner Benecke; Leonardo G Cohen; Joseph Classen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Rapid plasticity of human cortical movement representation induced by practice.

Authors:  J Classen; J Liepert; S P Wise; M Hallett; L G Cohen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  The acquisition of skilled motor performance: fast and slow experience-driven changes in primary motor cortex.

Authors:  A Karni; G Meyer; C Rey-Hipolito; P Jezzard; M M Adams; R Turner; L G Ungerleider
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Mechanisms of motor-evoked potential facilitation following prolonged dual peripheral and central stimulation in humans.

Authors:  M C Ridding; J L Taylor
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke.

Authors:  Friedhelm Hummel; Pablo Celnik; Pascal Giraux; Agnes Floel; Wan-Hsun Wu; Christian Gerloff; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2005-01-05       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Learning modifies subsequent induction of long-term potentiation-like and long-term depression-like plasticity in human motor cortex.

Authors:  Ulf Ziemann; Tihomir V Ilić; Tihomir V Iliać; Christian Pauli; Frank Meintzschel; Diane Ruge
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-02-18       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Changes in motor cortical excitability induced by paired associative stimulation.

Authors:  M C Ridding; J Uy
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.708

View more
  11 in total

1.  Changes in corticospinal excitability during reach adaptation in force fields.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry; Mohammad Ali Ahmadi-Pajouh; Michelle D Harran; Yousef Salimpour; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  The sensory side of post-stroke motor rehabilitation.

Authors:  Nadia Bolognini; Cristina Russo; Dylan J Edwards
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 2.406

3.  Changes in spinal but not cortical excitability following combined electrical stimulation of the tibial nerve and voluntary plantar-flexion.

Authors:  Olle Lagerquist; Cameron S Mang; David F Collins
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Cortical excitability changes following grasping exercise augmented with electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Gergely I Barsi; Dejan B Popovic; Ina M Tarkka; Thomas Sinkjaer; Michael J Grey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Effects of combined peripheral nerve stimulation and brain polarization on performance of a motor sequence task after chronic stroke.

Authors:  Pablo Celnik; Nam-Jong Paik; Yves Vandermeeren; Michael Dimyan; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Long-term sensory stimulation therapy improves hand function and restores cortical responsiveness in patients with chronic cerebral lesions. Three single case studies.

Authors:  Jan-Christoph Kattenstroth; Tobias Kalisch; Sören Peters; Martin Tegenthoff; Hubert R Dinse
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-25       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Influence of motor imagination on cortical activation during functional electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Clare Reynolds; Bethel A Osuagwu; Aleksandra Vuckovic
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  The effect of electrical stimulation on corticospinal excitability is dependent on application duration: a same subject pre-post test design.

Authors:  Rebecca K Andrews; Siobhan M Schabrun; Michael C Ridding; Mary P Galea; Paul W Hodges; Lucinda S Chipchase
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  Time of day does not modulate improvements in motor performance following a repetitive ballistic motor training task.

Authors:  Martin V Sale; Michael C Ridding; Michael A Nordstrom
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 3.599

10.  Restoration of Central Programmed Movement Pattern by Temporal Electrical Stimulation-Assisted Training in Patients with Spinal Cerebellar Atrophy.

Authors:  Ying-Zu Huang; Yao-Shun Chang; Miao-Ju Hsu; Alice M K Wong; Ya-Ju Chang
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 3.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.