Literature DB >> 14620362

Thematic processing of adjuncts: evidence from an eye-tracking experiment.

Simon P Liversedge1, Martin J Pickering, Emma L Clayes, Holly P Branigan.   

Abstract

We investigated thematic processing in sentences containing a prepositional phrase that was ambiguous between a locative and a temporal interpretation. We manipulated context (temporal or locative), target sentence (temporal or locative), and whether or not the main verb of the target and the context was repeated. Results showed that context dictated the participants' thematic expectations. Thematically, congruent target and context pairs were read faster than incongruent pairs. This effect was not modulated by verb repetition. We argue that wh-words cause readers to lodge semantically vacuous thematic roles in their discourse representation that bias a reader's interpretation of subsequent thematically ambiguous adjuncts in their discourse representation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14620362     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  3 in total

1.  The influence of only on syntactic processing of "long" relative clause sentences.

Authors:  Simon P Liversedge; Kevin B Paterson; Emma L Clayes
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2002-01

2.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity.

Authors:  K Rayner; S A Duffy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-05

3.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution [corrected].

Authors:  M C MacDonald; N J Pearlmutter; M S Seidenberg
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 8.934

  3 in total
  10 in total

Review 1.  Reading words in discourse: the modulation of lexical priming effects by message-level context.

Authors:  Kerry Ledoux; C Christine Camblin; Tamara Y Swaab; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev       Date:  2006-09

2.  The interplay of discourse congruence and lexical association during sentence processing: Evidence from ERPs and eye tracking.

Authors:  C Christine Camblin; Peter C Gordon; Tamara Y Swaab
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.059

3.  Coreference and lexical repetition: mechanisms of discourse integration.

Authors:  Kerry Ledoux; Peter C Gordon; C Christine Camblin; Tamara Y Swaab
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-06

4.  Distinguishing lexical- versus discourse-level processing using event-related potentials.

Authors:  Yi Ting Huang; Joseph Hopfinger; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-02

5.  Distinguishing the time course of lexical and discourse processes through context, coreference, and quantified expressions.

Authors:  Yi Ting Huang; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Priming prepositional phrase attachment: evidence from eye-tracking and event-related potentials.

Authors:  Megan A Boudewyn; Megan Zirnstein; Tamara Y Swaab; Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Print exposure modulates the effects of repetition priming during sentence reading.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12

8.  Word recognition during reading: the interaction between lexical repetition and frequency.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Wonil Choi; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-07

9.  Fine-grained semantic categorization across the abstract and concrete domains.

Authors:  Marta Ghio; Matilde Maria Serena Vaghi; Marco Tettamanti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Focus, newness and their combination: processing of information structure in discourse.

Authors:  Lijing Chen; Xingshan Li; Yufang Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.