Literature DB >> 14618626

Lead time associated with screening for prostate cancer.

Magnus Törnblom1, Henry Eriksson, Stefan Franzén, Ove Gustafsson, Hans Lilja, Ulf Norming, Jonas Hugosson.   

Abstract

Screening serum levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is now a major strategy for early detection of prostate cancer (PC). Quantification of the lead time thus obtained is important both for understanding the development of PC and for evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of widespread screening. In our study, 1,233 randomly selected men living in Stockholm in 1988 were invited to participate in an early detection (ED) program, in which suspicious findings provided by digital rectal examination (DRE), transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) and/or a PSA value >/=10.0 ng/mL were followed up by biopsy. The cumulative incidence (Kaplan-Meier) of PC in the 946 participants (ED) during 12 years of follow-up was compared to that of an age-matched, randomly selected reference population (RP) of 657 men for whom PSA values (from frozen serum samples) could also be obtained. The PC incidence in men in the RP with PSA values >/=3.0 ng/mL reached the corresponding level for the ED group after 10.6 years (the "catch-up" point). After 12 years of follow-up, the estimated median lead time for men with PSA values in this interval was 4.5 years in the ED population, compared to 7.8 years in the RP. With 20 years of follow-up, the estimated median lead time of the RP was enhanced to 10.7 years. The lead time in connection with PC was influenced by the initial PSA level (although with large variations), length of follow-up and sensitivity of the ED procedure employed. The ED program described here was not associated with major overdetection. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14618626     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.11554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  26 in total

1.  Calibrating disease progression models using population data: a critical precursor to policy development in cancer control.

Authors:  Roman Gulati; Lurdes Inoue; Jeffrey Katcher; William Hazelton; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 2.  Active surveillance for favorable-risk prostate cancer: what are the results and how safe is it?

Authors:  Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Prostate mechanical imaging: a new method for prostate assessment.

Authors:  Robert E Weiss; Vladimir Egorov; Suren Ayrapetyan; Noune Sarvazyan; Armen Sarvazyan
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  [Benefit assessment by the Federal Joint Committee: assessment of treatment strategies for low risk prostate cancer].

Authors:  M Schmedders; S Janatzek; B Zimmer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Prediction of mortality after radical prostatectomy by Charlson comorbidity index.

Authors:  Thomas J Guzzo; Paul Dluzniewski; Ryan Orosco; Elizabeth A Platz; Alan W Partin; Misop Han
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Mortality results from the Göteborg randomised population-based prostate-cancer screening trial.

Authors:  Jonas Hugosson; Sigrid Carlsson; Gunnar Aus; Svante Bergdahl; Ali Khatami; Pär Lodding; Carl-Gustaf Pihl; Johan Stranne; Erik Holmberg; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Delayed versus immediate surgical intervention and prostate cancer outcome.

Authors:  Christopher Warlick; Bruce J Trock; Patricia Landis; Jonathan I Epstein; H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Do patients undergo prostate examination while having a colonoscopy?

Authors:  Tess Hammett; Lawrence C Hookey; Jun Kawakami
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 9.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: trials and tribulations.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Lead time and overdiagnosis in prostate-specific antigen screening: importance of methods and context.

Authors:  Gerrit Draisma; Ruth Etzioni; Alex Tsodikov; Angela Mariotto; Elisabeth Wever; Roman Gulati; Eric Feuer; Harry de Koning
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 13.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.