Literature DB >> 20627284

Prediction of mortality after radical prostatectomy by Charlson comorbidity index.

Thomas J Guzzo1, Paul Dluzniewski, Ryan Orosco, Elizabeth A Platz, Alan W Partin, Misop Han.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Prostate cancer treatment should depend on the characteristics of a patient's prostate cancer as well as overall health status. A possible adverse consequence of poor patient selection is a lack of benefit because of premature death from another cause. We evaluated the association between perioperative comorbidity and risk of death from causes other than prostate cancer in men who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP).
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 14,052 men who underwent RP from 1983 to 2006. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score was calculated using the discharge records for the prostatectomy hospitalization. Mortality status and cause of death were obtained via chart review and searches of national databases. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of death from causes other than prostate cancer after RP by CCI score (0, 1, 2+).
RESULTS: The median age at RP was 58.1 years. The median follow-up was 7.6 years (interquartile range 4.3-11.5). Of 849 deaths, 599 (70.6%) resulted from causes other than prostate cancer. On multivariable analysis, men with a CCI ≥2 had a statistically significantly higher risk of death from causes other than prostate cancer compared with those with lower CCI scores (HR 2.18, 95% CI 1.30-3.64, P = .0003).
CONCLUSIONS: Greater perioperative comorbidity was associated with a higher risk of death from causes other than prostate cancer in men who underwent RP. Physicians should consider using a standardized tool to assess perioperative comorbidities to enhance appropriate recommendation for surgical treatment.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20627284      PMCID: PMC3643003          DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.02.069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  30 in total

1.  Accuracy of point predictions in survival analysis.

Authors:  R Henderson; M Jones; J Stare
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2001-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Comparison of the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification with the Charlson score as predictors of survival after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Michael Froehner; Rainer Koch; Rainer Litz; Axel Heller; Sven Oehlschlaeger; Manfred P Wirth
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Feasibility and limitations of comorbidity measurement in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Michael Froehner; Rainer Koch; Rainer J Litz; Sven Oehlschlaeger; Oliver W Hakenberg; Manfred P Wirth
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  The impact of co-morbid disease on cancer control and survival following radical cystectomy.

Authors:  David C Miller; David A Taub; Rodney L Dunn; James E Montie; John T Wei
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  Long-term biochemical disease-free and cancer-specific survival following anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. The 15-year Johns Hopkins experience.

Authors:  M Han; A W Partin; C R Pound; J I Epstein; P C Walsh
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.241

6.  Accuracy of life tables in predicting overall survival in patients after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jochen Walz; Nazareno Suardi; Shahrokh F Shariat; Claudio Jeldres; Paul Perrotte; Markus Graefen; Hughes Widmer; Philippe Arjane; Luc Valiquette; Georg Hutterer; Fred Saad; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Evaluation of radical prostatectomy specimens. A comparative analysis of sampling methods.

Authors:  G S Hall; C E Kramer; J I Epstein
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 6.394

8.  Natural history of early, localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jan-Erik Johansson; Ove Andrén; Swen-Olof Andersson; Paul W Dickman; Lars Holmberg; Anders Magnuson; Hans-Olov Adami
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Lead times and overdetection due to prostate-specific antigen screening: estimates from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Gerrit Draisma; Rob Boer; Suzie J Otto; Ingrid W van der Cruijsen; Ronald A M Damhuis; Fritz H Schröder; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-06-18       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Lead time associated with screening for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Magnus Törnblom; Henry Eriksson; Stefan Franzén; Ove Gustafsson; Hans Lilja; Ulf Norming; Jonas Hugosson
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 7.396

View more
  28 in total

1.  Screening and efficacy of radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Michael Froehner
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  Decisional involvement and information preferences of patients with hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  Kah Poh Loh; Mazie Tsang; Thomas W LeBlanc; Anthony Back; Paul R Duberstein; Supriya Gupta Mohile; Ronald M Epstein; Heidi D Klepin; Michael W Becker; Areej El-Jawahri; Stephanie J Lee
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-11-10

3.  CORR Insights: What is the effect of advanced age and comorbidity on postoperative morbidity and mortality after musculoskeletal tumor surgery?

Authors:  Felasfa M Wodajo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Allogeneic versus autologous blood transfusion and survival after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Heather J Chalfin; Steven M Frank; Zhaoyong Feng; Bruce J Trock; Charles G Drake; Alan W Partin; Elizabeth Humphreys; Paul M Ness; Byong C Jeong; Seung B Lee; Misop Han
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.157

5.  When is a peri-procedural death iatrogenic in nature?

Authors:  Marian Wang; Gilbert Lau
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 2.007

6.  In-hospital outcomes and cost assessment between bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate.

Authors:  Toru Sugihara; Hideo Yasunaga; Hiromasa Horiguchi; Mitsuhiro Nakamura; Hiroaki Nishimatsu; Haruki Kume; Kazuhiko Ohe; Shinya Matsuda; Yukio Homma
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Grading complications after transurethral resection of prostate using modified Clavien classification system and predicting complications using the Charlson comorbidity index.

Authors:  Swarnendu Mandal; Satya N Sankhwar; Rohit Kathpalia; Manish Kumar Singh; Manoj Kumar; Apul Goel; Vishwajeet Singh; Rahul Janak Sinha; Bhupender Pal Singh; Divakar Dalela
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-02-16       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Current impact of age and comorbidity assessment on prostate cancer treatment choice and over/undertreatment risk.

Authors:  Pierre Lunardi; Guillaume Ploussard; Pascale Grosclaude; Mathieu Roumiguié; Michel Soulié; Jean Baptiste Beauval; Bernard Malavaud
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Clinical factors associated with development of severe-complicated Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Raina Shivashankar; Sahil Khanna; Patricia P Kammer; W Scott Harmsen; Alan R Zinsmeister; Larry M Baddour; Darrell S Pardi
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 11.382

10.  Clinical predictors of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection in out-patients.

Authors:  R Shivashankar; S Khanna; P P Kammer; W Scott Harmsen; A R Zinsmeister; L M Baddour; D S Pardi
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 8.171

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.