Literature DB >> 21720836

[Benefit assessment by the Federal Joint Committee: assessment of treatment strategies for low risk prostate cancer].

M Schmedders1, S Janatzek, B Zimmer.   

Abstract

One of the Federal Joint Committee's duties is to assess benefit, need, and cost-effectiveness of diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. The aim is to decide whether they can be provided within the statutory health care system in Germany. The systematic assessment concerning low dose rate brachytherapy with permanent seed implantation for treatment of men with localized prostate cancer revealed that sufficient scientific evidence for its benefit compared to therapeutic alternatives is still missing. In 2009, the Federal Joint Committee recommended a randomized controlled trial in order to evaluate the different therapies. Based on a concept developed by the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Funds urology and radiooncology experts and other protagonists are currently working on the steps to be taken for implementation of a preference-based randomized controlled trial to compare radical prostatectomy, percutaneous radiotherapy, low dose rate brachytherapy with permanent seed implantation, and active surveillance in the treatment of low or early intermediate risk prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21720836     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-011-2545-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  9 in total

1.  ESTRO/EAU/EORTC recommendations on permanent seed implantation for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  D Ash; A Flynn; J Battermann; T de Reijke; P Lavagnini; L Blank
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  Tumour and target volumes in permanent prostate brachytherapy: a supplement to the ESTRO/EAU/EORTC recommendations on prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Carl Salembier; Pablo Lavagnini; Philippe Nickers; Paola Mangili; Alex Rijnders; Alfredo Polo; Jack Venselaar; Peter Hoskin
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2007-02-26       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 3.  Percutaneous radiotherapy for low-risk prostate cancer: options for 2007.

Authors:  Dirk Bottke; Thomas Wiegel
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  A prospective randomised trial comparing the modified HM3 with the MODULITH® SLX-F2 lithotripter.

Authors:  Pascal Zehnder; Beat Roth; Frédéric Birkhäuser; Silvia Schneider; Rolf Schmutz; George N Thalmann; Urs E Studer
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anna Bill-Axelson; Lars Holmberg; Mirja Ruutu; Hans Garmo; Jennifer R Stark; Christer Busch; Stig Nordling; Michael Häggman; Swen-Olof Andersson; Stefan Bratell; Anders Spångberg; Juni Palmgren; Gunnar Steineck; Hans-Olov Adami; Jan-Erik Johansson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Long-term failure patterns and survival in a randomized dose-escalation trial for prostate cancer. Who dies of disease?

Authors:  Deborah A Kuban; Lawrence B Levy; M Rex Cheung; Andrew K Lee; Seungtaek Choi; Steven Frank; Alan Pollack
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Randomized trial comparing conventional-dose with high-dose conformal radiation therapy in early-stage adenocarcinoma of the prostate: long-term results from proton radiation oncology group/american college of radiology 95-09.

Authors:  Anthony L Zietman; Kyounghwa Bae; Jerry D Slater; William U Shipley; Jason A Efstathiou; John J Coen; David A Bush; Margie Lunt; Daphna Y Spiegel; Rafi Skowronski; B Rodney Jabola; Carl J Rossi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Lead time and overdiagnosis in prostate-specific antigen screening: importance of methods and context.

Authors:  Gerrit Draisma; Ruth Etzioni; Alex Tsodikov; Angela Mariotto; Elisabeth Wever; Roman Gulati; Eric Feuer; Harry de Koning
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Lead time associated with screening for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Magnus Törnblom; Henry Eriksson; Stefan Franzén; Ove Gustafsson; Hans Lilja; Ulf Norming; Jonas Hugosson
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 7.396

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  The cost-utility of open prostatectomy compared with active surveillance in early localised prostate cancer.

Authors:  Florian Koerber; Raphaela Waidelich; Björn Stollenwerk; Wolf Rogowski
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 2.655

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.