Literature DB >> 14604185

Why nature chose A, C, G and U/T: an error-coding perspective of nucleotide alphabet composition.

Dónall A Mac Dónaill1.   

Abstract

The question of whether the size and make-up of the natural nucleotide alphabet is a consequence of selection pressure, or simply a frozen accident, is one of the fundamental questions of biology. Nucleotide replication is essentially an information transmission phenomenon, and so it seems reasonable to explore the issue from the perspective of theoretical computer science, and of error-coding theory in particular. In this analysis it is shown that the essential recognition features of nucleotides may be naturally expressed as 4-digit binary numbers, capturing the hydrogen acceptor/donor patterns (3-bits) and the purine/pyrimidine feature (1-bit). Optimal alphabets consist of nucleotides in which the purine/pyrimidine feature is related to the acceptor/donor pattern as a parity bit. Numerically interpreted, such alphabets correspond to parity check codes, simple but effective error-resistant structures. The natural alphabet appears to be an adaptation of one of two optimal solutions, constrained to its present size and composition by a combination of chemical and coding-theory factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14604185     DOI: 10.1023/a:1025715209867

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orig Life Evol Biosph        ISSN: 0169-6149            Impact factor:   1.950


  15 in total

1.  Prebiotic synthesis of nucleotides.

Authors:  G Zubay; T Mui
Journal:  Orig Life Evol Biosph       Date:  2001 Feb-Apr       Impact factor: 1.950

2.  Mimicking the Structure and Function of DNA: Insights into DNA Stability and Replication.

Authors: 
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 15.336

3.  What is the optimum size for the genetic alphabet?

Authors:  E Szathmáry
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-04-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Enzymatic incorporation of a new base pair into DNA and RNA extends the genetic alphabet.

Authors:  J A Piccirilli; T Krauch; S E Moroney; S A Benner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-01-04       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Four letters in the genetic alphabet: a frozen evolutionary optimum?

Authors:  E Szathmáry
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1991-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  The stability of the RNA bases: implications for the origin of life.

Authors:  M Levy; S L Miller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-07-07       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Is there an error correcting code in the base sequence in DNA?

Authors:  L S Liebovitch; Y Tao; A T Todorov; L Levine
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  An all-purine precursor of nucleic acids.

Authors:  G Wächtershäuser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The origin of the genetic code.

Authors:  F H Crick
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1968-12       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Solution Structure of a Nonpolar, Non-Hydrogen-Bonded Base Pair Surrogate in DNA.

Authors:  Kevin M Guckian; Thomas R Krugh; Eric T Kool
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2000-07-26       Impact factor: 15.419

View more
  2 in total

1.  An asymmetric underlying rule in the assignment of codons: possible clue to a quick early evolution of the genetic code via successive binary choices.

Authors:  Marc Delarue
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 4.942

2.  Synthetic biology: Six pack and stack.

Authors:  Cheulhee Jung; Andrew D Ellington
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 24.427

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.