Literature DB >> 1719561

Four letters in the genetic alphabet: a frozen evolutionary optimum?

E Szathmáry1.   

Abstract

Piccirilli et al. (Nature, Lond. 343, 33-37 (1990)) have shown experimentally that the replicatable introduction of new base pairs into the genetic alphabet is chemically feasible. The fact that our current genetic alphabet uses only two base pairs can be explained provided that this basic feature of organisms became fixed in an RNA world utilizing ribozymes rather than protein enzymes. The fitness of such ribo-organisms is determined by two factors: replication fidelity and overall catalytic efficiency (basic metabolic or growth rate). Replication fidelity is shown to decrease roughly exponentially, and catalytic efficiency is shown to increase with diminishing returns, with the number of letters for a fixed genome length; hence their product, i.e. fitness, gives rise to a set of values with an optimum. Under a wide range of parameter values the optimum rests at two base pairs. The chemical identity of the particular choice in our genetic alphabet can also be rationalized. This optimum is considered frozen, as currently the dominant catalysts are proteins rather than RNAs.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1719561     DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1991.0093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  8 in total

1.  Microsatellite instability.

Authors:  I M Frayling
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  Why nature chose A, C, G and U/T: an error-coding perspective of nucleotide alphabet composition.

Authors:  Dónall A Mac Dónaill
Journal:  Orig Life Evol Biosph       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.950

Review 3.  The case for an error minimizing standard genetic code.

Authors:  Stephen J Freeland; Tao Wu; Nick Keulmann
Journal:  Orig Life Evol Biosph       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.950

4.  Optimal alphabets for an RNA world.

Authors:  Paul P Gardner; Barbara R Holland; Vincent Moulton; Mike Hendy; David Penny
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  What is the optimum size for the genetic alphabet?

Authors:  E Szathmáry
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-04-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Origin and evolution of the genetic code: the universal enigma.

Authors:  Eugene V Koonin; Artem S Novozhilov
Journal:  IUBMB Life       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.885

Review 7.  Undefining life's biochemistry: implications for abiogenesis.

Authors:  Stephen Freeland
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Prebiotic competition and evolution in self-replicating polynucleotides can explain the properties of DNA/RNA in modern living systems.

Authors:  Hemachander Subramanian; Joel Brown; Robert Gatenby
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.436

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.