Literature DB >> 21127882

Obese patients in an open MRI at 1.0 Tesla: image quality, diagnostic impact and feasibility.

Maximilian de Bucourt1, Florian Streitparth, Uta Wonneberger, Jens Rump, Ulf Teichgräber.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the performance of an open MRI system at its conceptual limits by examining excessively obese patients who otherwise could not receive adequate imaging examinations.
METHODS: Twenty-six excessively obese patients (BMI ≥ 35, average age 46) where CT, standard MR or ultrasound examinations were not possible or not conclusive were referred to an open MRI system at 1.0 Tesla. Image quality was measured by SNR and CNR with the integrated body coil for obese patients and optimal body coils for a regular weight control group (average BMI 23, average age 30). MRI findings were evaluated by a diagnostic impact matrix.
RESULTS: SNR and CNR were generally lower in obese patients when the integrated body coil was used compared to the normal weight group with ideal body coils e.g.: For cerebral imaging T2W TSE (<5% for white matter, ca. 30% for grey matter) and T1W SE (ca. 15% for white matter, <5% for grey matter), for spinal imaging T2W TSE (ca. 35% for disc and vertebral body) and T1W SE (about 2% for disc, ca. 10% for vertebral body). Relevant new diagnoses impacting patient's therapy were identified in 30% (8/26), the particular medical question of the referring physician could be ruled out as possible reason for the medical condition in 53% (14/26).
CONCLUSION: In excessively obese patients where CT, standard MR or ultrasound examination is not possible or not conclusive open MRI system have great potential in diagnostic evaluation, offering lower but sufficient image quality to impact therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21127882     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-2005-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  38 in total

Review 1.  Obesity in anaesthesia and intensive care.

Authors:  J P Adams; P G Murphy
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 2.  Medical consequences of obesity.

Authors:  George A Bray
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Storing up problems: the medical case for a slimmer nation.

Authors:  David Simpson
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.659

Review 4.  Obesity and infection.

Authors:  Matthew E Falagas; Maria Kompoti
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 25.071

5.  Optimizing imaging protocols for overweight and obese patients: a lutetium orthosilicate PET/CT study.

Authors:  Benjamin S Halpern; Magnus Dahlbom; Martin A Auerbach; Christiaan Schiepers; Barbara J Fueger; Wolfgang A Weber; Daniel H S Silverman; Osman Ratib; Johannes Czernin
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 6.  Association of bodyweight with total mortality and with cardiovascular events in coronary artery disease: a systematic review of cohort studies.

Authors:  Abel Romero-Corral; Victor M Montori; Virend K Somers; Josef Korinek; Randal J Thomas; Thomas G Allison; Farouk Mookadam; Francisco Lopez-Jimenez
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-08-19       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of U.S. adults.

Authors:  Eugenia E Calle; Carmen Rodriguez; Kimberly Walker-Thurmond; Michael J Thun
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Gastroesophageal reflux disease and obesity.

Authors:  Girish Anand; Philip O Katz
Journal:  Rev Gastroenterol Disord       Date:  2008

9.  Obesity in adulthood and its consequences for life expectancy: a life-table analysis.

Authors:  Anna Peeters; Jan J Barendregt; Frans Willekens; Johan P Mackenbach; Abdullah Al Mamun; Luc Bonneux
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-01-07       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Lifetime medical costs of obesity: prevention no cure for increasing health expenditure.

Authors:  Pieter H M van Baal; Johan J Polder; G Ardine de Wit; Rudolf T Hoogenveen; Talitha L Feenstra; Hendriek C Boshuizen; Peter M Engelfriet; Werner B F Brouwer
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  7 in total

1.  [Percutaneous interventions in an open MR system: technical background and clinical indications].

Authors:  F Fischbach; K Fischbach; J Ricke
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Quantification of epicardial adipose tissue in obese patients using an open-bore MR scanner.

Authors:  Francesco Secchi; Carmela Asteria; Caterina B Monti; Alexis Elias Malavazos; Davide Capra; Marco Alì; Cecilia L A Giassi; Simona Francesconi; Sara Basilico; Alessandro Giovanelli; Lelio Morricone; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2022-05-24

3.  Effects of respiratory motion on coronary wall MR imaging: a quantitative study of older adults.

Authors:  Kai Lin; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Xiaoming Bi; Ying Liu; Debiao Li; James C Carr
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-02-03       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Use of a 1.0 Tesla open scanner for evaluation of pediatric and congenital heart disease: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jimmy C Lu; James C Nielsen; Layne Morowitz; Muzammil Musani; Maryam Ghadimi Mahani; Prachi P Agarwal; El-Sayed H Ibrahim; Adam L Dorfman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 5.364

5.  High-field open versus short-bore magnetic resonance imaging of the spine: a randomized controlled comparison of image quality.

Authors:  Judith Enders; Matthias Rief; Elke Zimmermann; Patrick Asbach; Gerd Diederichs; Christoph Wetz; Eberhard Siebert; Moritz Wagner; Bernd Hamm; Marc Dewey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using an Open 1.0T MR Platform: A Comparative Study with a 1.5T Tunnel System.

Authors:  Katharina Fischbach; Otrud Kosiek; Björn Friebe; Christian Wybranski; Bernhard Schnackenburg; Alexander Schmeisser; Jan Smid; Jens Ricke; Maciej Pech
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2017-09-15

7.  Prospective comparison of transient elastography, MRI and serum scores for grading steatosis and detecting non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in bariatric surgery candidates.

Authors:  Philippe Garteiser; Laurent Castera; Muriel Coupaye; Sabrina Doblas; Daniela Calabrese; Marco Dioguardi Burgio; Séverine Ledoux; Pierre Bedossa; Marina Esposito-Farèse; Simon Msika; Bernard E Van Beers; Pauline Jouët
Journal:  JHEP Rep       Date:  2021-09-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.