Literature DB >> 14586631

Surgical results and functional outcome after total anorectal reconstruction by double graciloplasty supported by external-source electrostimulation and/or implantable pulse generators: an 8-year experience.

Vincenzo Violi1, Adamo S Boselli, Massimo De Bernardinis, Renato Costi, Giorgio Nervi, Anna Bertelè, Angelo Franzè, Luigi Roncoroni.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Surgical and functional results after abdominoperineal resection and total anorectal reconstruction by electrostimulated gracilis muscle transposition are still poorly documented. This study prospectively evaluated surgical and functional outcome over time in our patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients underwent abdominoperineal resection, coloperineal pullthrough, double graciloplasty, and loop abdominal stoma. Temporary external-source intermittent electrostimulation, biofeedback training, and selective delayed stimulator implantation to improve unsatisfactory results were carried out in the first 13 patients (1st series); thereafter (2nd series) the stimulator was implanted during graciloplasty. Surgical and oncological results were followed up in all patients. Functional results were evaluated in 16 patients who underwent abdominal stoma takedown, eight in each of the two series, by anomanometry (up to 1 year) and our own 0-20 scoring system (up to 8 years from initial surgery).
RESULTS: The rate of major and minor postoperative complications was 21.7% and 65%, respectively. Continuous electrostimulation proved effective on resting anal pressure. Early clinical assessments showed satisfactory functional results (considered as having a score < or =8) in all first-group patients, including five who had stimulator support, and in one-half of second-group patients. After impairment (at least 2 points) at 1 year in five patients, four of whom were from the first group, all functional results improved and became satisfactory from 5 years on (1st series) and from 4 years on (2nd series).
CONCLUSION: Despite marked morbidity the high rate of good results, which improved over time, suggests that total anorectal reconstruction is worth being performed as part of abdominoperineal resection in well-selected patients with a strong motivation to avoid a permanent colostomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14586631     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-003-0528-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  28 in total

1.  Quality of life after total anorectal reconstruction: long-term results.

Authors:  E Cavina; M Seccia; P Banti; G Zocco; O Goletti
Journal:  Chir Ital       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct

2.  Morbidity and functional outcome after double dynamic graciloplasty for anorectal reconstruction.

Authors:  E Rullier; F Zerbib; C Laurent; M Caudry; J Saric
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Preliminary results of a multicentre trial of the electrically stimulated gracilis neoanal sphincter.

Authors:  B J Mander; S D Wexner; N S Williams; D C Bartolo; D Z Lubowski; T Oresland; G Romano; M R Keighley
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Development of an electrically stimulated neoanal sphincter.

Authors:  N S Williams; J Patel; B D George; R I Hallan; E S Watkins
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-11-09       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Total anorectal reconstruction results in complete anorectal sensory loss.

Authors:  J F Abercrombie; J Rogers; N S Williams
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Use of the gracilis muscles for sphincteric construction after abdominoperineal resection. Technique and preliminary results.

Authors:  U Mercati; V Trancanelli; G P Castagnoli; A Mariotti; R Ciaccarini
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Construction of a continent perineal colostomy by using electrostimulated gracilis muscles after abdominoperineal resection: personal technique and experience with 32 cases.

Authors:  E Cavina; M Seccia; G Evangelista; M Chiarugi; P Buccianti; A Chirico; M Lenzi; P Bortolotti; G Bellomini; M Arganini
Journal:  Ital J Surg Sci       Date:  1987

8.  Continent perineal colostomy by transposition of gracilis muscles. Technical remarks and results in 14 cases.

Authors:  E Santoro; C Tirelli; F Scutari; A Garofalo; G Silecchia; M Scaccia; E Santoro
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Quality of life after surgery for rectal cancer: do we still need a permanent colostomy?

Authors:  K Renner; H R Rosen; G Novi; N Hölbling; R Schiessel
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Study protocols and functional results in 86 electrostimulated graciloplasties.

Authors:  M Seccia; C Menconi; R Balestri; E Cavina
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  [Dynamic graciloplasty vs artificial bowel sphincter in the management of severe fecal incontinence].

Authors:  O Ruthmann; A Fischer; U T Hopt; H J Schrag
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  Neosphincter surgery for fecal incontinence: a critical and unbiased review of the relevant literature.

Authors:  Orlin Belyaev; Christophe Müller; Waldemar Uhl
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 3.  Current aspects and future prospects of total anorectal reconstruction--a critical and comprehensive review of the literature.

Authors:  Roman A Inglin; Daniel Eberli; Lukas E Brügger; Tullio Sulser; Norman S Williams; Daniel Candinas
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Surgical management for fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Joselin L Anandam
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2014-09

5.  Modified dynamic gracilis neosphincter for fecal incontinence: an analysis of functional outcome at a single institution.

Authors:  M Z M Hassan; M M G Rathnayaka; K I Deen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Use of the gluteus maximus muscle as the neosphincter for restoration of anal function after abdominoperineal resection.

Authors:  J D Puerta Díaz; R Castaño Llano; L J Lombana; J I Restrepo; G Gómez
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 3.781

7.  Dynamic versus Adynamic Graciloplasty in Treatment of End-Stage Fecal Incontinence: Is the Implantation of the Pacemaker Really Necessary? 12-Month Follow-Up in a Clinical, Physiological, and Functional Study.

Authors:  Piotr Walega; Michal Romaniszyn; Benita Siarkiewicz; Dorota Zelazny
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.260

Review 8.  Sphincter-sparing surgery in patients with low-lying rectal cancer: techniques, oncologic outcomes, and functional results.

Authors:  Liliana Bordeianou; Lillias Holmes Maguire; Karim Alavi; Ranjan Sudan; Paul E Wise; Andreas M Kaiser
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 3.452

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.