Literature DB >> 16554983

Neosphincter surgery for fecal incontinence: a critical and unbiased review of the relevant literature.

Orlin Belyaev1, Christophe Müller, Waldemar Uhl.   

Abstract

Up until about 15 years ago the only realistic option for end-stage fecal incontinence was the creation of a permanent stoma. There have since been several developments. Dynamic graciloplasty (DGP) and artificial bowel sphincter (ABS) are well-established surgical techniques, which offer the patient a chance for continence restoration and improved quality of life; however, they are unfortunately associated with high morbidity and low success rates. Several trials have been done in an attempt to clarify the advantages and disadvantages of these methods and define their place in the second-line treatment of severe, refractory fecal incontinence. This review presents a critical and unbiased overview of the current status of neosphincter surgery according to the available data in the world literature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16554983     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-005-3159-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  47 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of faecal incontinence.

Authors:  A E Chapman; B Geerdes; P Hewett; J Young; T Eyers; G Kiroff; G J Maddern
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Comparison of quality of life and anorectal function after artificial sphincter implantation.

Authors:  Paul-Antoine Lehur; Frank Zerbib; Michel Neunlist; Pascal Glemain; Stanislas Bruley des Varannes
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Morbidity and functional outcome after double dynamic graciloplasty for anorectal reconstruction.

Authors:  E Rullier; F Zerbib; C Laurent; M Caudry; J Saric
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Preliminary results of a multicentre trial of the electrically stimulated gracilis neoanal sphincter.

Authors:  B J Mander; S D Wexner; N S Williams; D C Bartolo; D Z Lubowski; T Oresland; G Romano; M R Keighley
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Development of an electrically stimulated neoanal sphincter.

Authors:  N S Williams; J Patel; B D George; R I Hallan; E S Watkins
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-11-09       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Artificial anal sphincter: prospective clinical and manometric evaluation.

Authors:  P A Lehur; J V Roig; M Duinslaeger
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Long-term results of artificial anal sphincter implantation for severe anal incontinence.

Authors:  J Christiansen; O O Rasmussen; K Lindorff-Larsen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Long-term follow-up of dynamic graciloplasty for faecal incontinence.

Authors:  M J Thornton; M L Kennedy; D Z Lubowski; D W King
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.788

9.  Artificial anal sphincter in severe fecal incontinence: outcome of prospective experience with 37 patients in one institution.

Authors:  Francis Michot; Bruno Costaglioli; Anne-Marie Leroi; Philippe Denis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Dynamic graciloplasty in patients born with an anorectal malformation.

Authors:  Sacha M Koch; Ozenç Uludağ; Mart-Jan Rongen; Cor G Baeten; Wim van Gemert
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  8 in total

1.  Autobionics: a new paradigm in regenerative medicine and surgery.

Authors:  Hutan Ashrafian; Ara Darzi; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  Regen Med       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.806

2.  A novel animal model for external anal sphincter insufficiency.

Authors:  Lukas Brügger; Roman Inglin; Daniel Candinas; Tullio Sulser; Daniel Eberli
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Retrograde colonic irrigation for faecal incontinence after low anterior resection.

Authors:  S M P Koch; M P Rietveld; B Govaert; W G van Gemert; C G M I Baeten
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  The ProTect device in the treatment of severe fecal incontinence: preliminary results of a multicenter trial.

Authors:  P Giamundo; D F Altomare; M Rinaldi; P De Nardi; V D'Onofrio; A Infantino; F Pucciani; G Romano
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Anal plugs and retrograde colonic irrigation are helpful in fecal incontinence or constipation.

Authors:  Marcel Cazemier; Richelle-Jf Felt-Bersma; Chris-Jj Mulder
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Dynamic versus Adynamic Graciloplasty in Treatment of End-Stage Fecal Incontinence: Is the Implantation of the Pacemaker Really Necessary? 12-Month Follow-Up in a Clinical, Physiological, and Functional Study.

Authors:  Piotr Walega; Michal Romaniszyn; Benita Siarkiewicz; Dorota Zelazny
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.260

7.  The artificial bowel sphincter for faecal incontinence: a single centre study.

Authors:  Jarno Melenhorst; Sacha M Koch; Wim G van Gemert; Cor G Baeten
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  SECCA procedure for anal incontinence and antibiotic treatment: a case report of anal abscess.

Authors:  Francesca Mandolfino; Rosario Fornaro; Cesare Stabilini; Marco Casaccia; Tommaso Testa; Marco Frascio
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 2.102

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.