Literature DB >> 20180122

Modified dynamic gracilis neosphincter for fecal incontinence: an analysis of functional outcome at a single institution.

M Z M Hassan1, M M G Rathnayaka, K I Deen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We undertook a prospective longitudinal study of patients with end-stage fecal incontinence who were undergoing transposition of the gracilis muscle as a neo-anal sphincter with external low-frequency electrical stimulation of the nerve to the gracilis combined with biofeedback.
METHODS: A total of 31 patients (21 male, 10 female: median age: 22 years; range: 4-77 years) underwent this procedure for treatment of traumatic disruption (11 patients, 35%), congenital atresia (11 patients, 35%), iatrogenic injury (6-20%), and perineal sepsis (3 patients, 10%). The gracilis muscle was transposed at operation in an alpha or gamma configuration. Low-frequency (7 Hz) transcutaneous electrical stimulation commenced 2 weeks after operation and was continued for up to 12 weeks. Biofeedback therapy, which consisted of supervised neosphincter squeeze exercises, commenced simultaneously and continued for up to 28 weeks. Outcome was assessed by clinical examination, anal manometry, the Cleveland Clinic Florida continence score (CCFS), and the Rockwood quality of life scale (FIQL). Successful outcome was defined by improvement in clinical outcome, patient satisfaction, a positive result on anal manometry, and/or CCFS < 9, or FIQL > or = 4.
RESULTS: At median follow-up of 67 months, overall improvement was seen in 22 (71%). Maximum resting pressure (MRP) and maximum squeeze pressure (MSP) improved significantly after operation [MRP pre versus post, mean (SD), cm water-13.8 (9.6) versus 20.9 (11.3); P = 0.01; and MSP 36.6 (22.4) versus 95.4 (71.2), P = 0.001]. In a subset of 18 patients who showed improvement after operation, the CCFS score (mean, SD) improved from 19.2 (3.4) to 5.2 (5.6); P = 0.0001. FIQL (mean, SD) showed significant improvement in all four domains in 14 patients who reported improvement since the year 2000.
CONCLUSIONS: A modified dynamic gracilis neoanal sphincter for end-stage fecal incontinence helps restore and sustain continence with improvement in quality of life in the majority of patients. The procedure was most effective as augmentation in those who had suffered a traumatic injury, when compared with patients with congenital atresia and sepsis that had resulted in loss of the native anal sphincter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20180122     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-010-0489-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  24 in total

1.  Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence.

Authors:  T H Rockwood; J M Church; J W Fleshman; R L Kane; C Mavrantonis; A G Thorson; S D Wexner; D Bliss; A C Lowry
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 2.  Epidemiology of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Richard L Nelson
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Effect of vaginal delivery on the pelvic floor: a 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  S J Snooks; M Swash; S E Mathers; M M Henry
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Development of an electrically stimulated neoanal sphincter.

Authors:  N S Williams; J Patel; B D George; R I Hallan; E S Watkins
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-11-09       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Practice parameters for the treatment of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Joe J Tjandra; Sharon L Dykes; Ravin R Kumar; C Neal Ellis; Sharon G Gregorcyk; Neil H Hyman; W Donald Buie
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 6.  Evolving therapy for fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Jane J Y Tan; Miranda Chan; Joe J Tjandra
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Use of the gracilis muscles for sphincteric construction after abdominoperineal resection. Technique and preliminary results.

Authors:  U Mercati; V Trancanelli; G P Castagnoli; A Mariotti; R Ciaccarini
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 8.  Etiology and management of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  J M Jorge; S D Wexner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Bowel management for fecal incontinence in patients with anorectal malformations.

Authors:  A Peña; K Guardino; J M Tovilla; M A Levitt; G Rodriguez; R Torres
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.545

10.  Prevalence of and factors associated with fecal incontinence in a large community study of older individuals.

Authors:  Carline R Quander; Martha Clare Morris; Joshua Melson; Julia L Bienias; Denis A Evans
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Current management of fecal incontinence: choosing amongst treatment options to optimize outcomes.

Authors:  Julie Ann M Van Koughnett; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  The gracilis myocutaneous free flap: a quantitative analysis of the fasciocutaneous blood supply and implications for autologous breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Iain S Whitaker; Maria Karavias; Ramin Shayan; Cara Michelle le Roux; Warren M Rozen; Russell J Corlett; G Ian Taylor; Mark W Ashton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Pressing the nerve alters muscle fiber types of the peroneus longus in rats: preliminary evidence for external anal sphincteroplasty.

Authors:  Song Shi; Hao Liu; Xiaobin Bai; Yongxiao Cao
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-05-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.