Literature DB >> 8076489

Study protocols and functional results in 86 electrostimulated graciloplasties.

M Seccia1, C Menconi, R Balestri, E Cavina.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study analyzes different protocols adopted in 86 electrostimulated graciloplasties performed during the last eight years, comparing functional and manometry results in 63 patients.
METHODS: Electrostimulated graciloplasties were performed to construct a neosphincter after surgical removal of the anorectum for cancer in 75 patients and to substitute the anal sphincter in 11 fully incontinent patients. An intermittent stimulation protocol, using external devices, was applied in the first 68 patients, while long-term stimulation was carried out with implantable stimulators and intramuscular electrodes in the last 18 patients. Sixty-three patients remaining under study were evaluated by questionnaires, continence scores, and manometry.
RESULTS: In patients submitted to intermittent stimulation, continence was achieved in 71 percent of 42 "neosphincters" after rectal resection and in 33 percent of 3 incontinent patients. Adopting chronic stimulation, implantable stimulators and intramuscular electrodes, continence reached 100 percent and 83 percent, respectively. Significant differences were also observed in resting and voluntary pressure values between the intermittently and chronically stimulated patients. Incontinent patients showed after chronic stimulation significant increases in mean resting and maximum voluntary pressures: from 13.3 to 60.5 mmHg and from 32 to 103 mmHg, respectively (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the efficacy of chronic stimulation and the validity of a bilateral, "one-time" graciloplasty to reconstruct or substitute the anal sphincter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8076489     DOI: 10.1007/bf02052595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  7 in total

1.  [Anal sphincter replacement].

Authors:  C G M I Baeten
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  Current aspects and future prospects of total anorectal reconstruction--a critical and comprehensive review of the literature.

Authors:  Roman A Inglin; Daniel Eberli; Lukas E Brügger; Tullio Sulser; Norman S Williams; Daniel Candinas
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  The pelvic floor in health and disease.

Authors:  A A Shelton; M L Welton
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1997-08

4.  The electrically stimulated gracilis neosphincter incorporated as part of total anorectal reconstruction after abdominoperineal excision of the rectum.

Authors:  B J Mander; J F Abercrombie; B D George; N S Williams
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Dynamic graciloplasty for total anorectal reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection for rectal tumour.

Authors:  K S Ho; F Seow-Choen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2004-08-04       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Surgical results and functional outcome after total anorectal reconstruction by double graciloplasty supported by external-source electrostimulation and/or implantable pulse generators: an 8-year experience.

Authors:  Vincenzo Violi; Adamo S Boselli; Massimo De Bernardinis; Renato Costi; Giorgio Nervi; Anna Bertelè; Angelo Franzè; Luigi Roncoroni
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-10-28       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Dynamic versus Adynamic Graciloplasty in Treatment of End-Stage Fecal Incontinence: Is the Implantation of the Pacemaker Really Necessary? 12-Month Follow-Up in a Clinical, Physiological, and Functional Study.

Authors:  Piotr Walega; Michal Romaniszyn; Benita Siarkiewicz; Dorota Zelazny
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.260

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.