Literature DB >> 8411030

Psychosocial issues raised by a familial ovarian cancer register.

J Green1, F Murton, H Statham.   

Abstract

A Familial Ovarian Cancer Register has been established which has recruited primarily through media publicity. In depth semi-structured interviews were carried out with 20 women who had volunteered in order to explore (1) knowledge about the disease, (2) motivations for contacting the Register, and (3) expectations. We found that interviewees were generally well informed about the symptoms of the disease as a result of their relatives' experiences. There was, nevertheless, a need for information which the Register was seen as potentially fulfilling, although most subjects gave altruistic reasons for volunteering. Only one interviewee said that the publicity about the Register had made her more anxious. Most said that their anxieties had not been affected either way by the Register. Subjects did not have a clear idea of what being on the Register would mean, although there was an expectation of screening for early signs of the disease. Many interviewees had models of familial disease which did not follow mendelian genetics. This has implications for the targetting of education and screening programmes. Other psychosocial issues raised by a register of this kind are discussed, many of which require continuing monitoring to ensure that the psychological costs do not outweight the benefits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8411030      PMCID: PMC1016457          DOI: 10.1136/jmg.30.7.575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Genet        ISSN: 0022-2593            Impact factor:   6.318


  3 in total

1.  Oculodentodigital dysplasia.

Authors:  R J GORLIN; L H MISKIN; J W St GEME
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1963-07       Impact factor: 4.406

2.  Hallermann-Streiff syndrome. Clinical and prognostic considerations.

Authors:  R W Steele; J W Bass
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1970-11

Review 3.  The heterogeneity of microphthalmia in the mentally retarded.

Authors:  M Warburg
Journal:  Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser       Date:  1971-03
  3 in total
  13 in total

1.  To test or not to test? Moderators of the relationship between risk perceptions and interest in predictive genetic testing.

Authors:  Shoshana Shiloh; Shiri Ilan
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2005-09-30

2.  Counseling families with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: A psychosocial perspective.

Authors:  M P Richards; N Hallowell; J M Green; F Murton; H Statham
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Genetic counseling for the next 25 years: Models for the future.

Authors:  R H Kenen; A C Smith
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Knowledge of Breast Cancer Genetics Among Breast Cancer Patients and First-Degree Relatives of Affected Individuals.

Authors:  A L Wonderlick; B A Fine
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Family Communication and Genetic Counseling: The Case of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  J Green; M Richards; F Murton; H Statham; N Hallowell
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Population screening for genetic susceptibility to disease.

Authors:  A Clarke
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-07-01

7.  Family history and perceived vulnerability to some common diseases: a study of young people and their parents.

Authors:  M Ponder; J Lee; J Green; M Richards
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 8.  Lay understanding of familial risk of common chronic diseases: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research.

Authors:  Fiona M Walter; Jon Emery; Dejana Braithwaite; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

9.  Attitudes towards bipolar disorder and predictive genetic testing among patients and providers.

Authors:  L B Smith; B Sapers; V I Reus; N B Freimer
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 6.318

10.  Women at risk of ovarian cancer: attitudes towards and expectations of the familial ovarian cancer clinic.

Authors:  R Sheppard; A Fry; R Rush; C M Steel; A Cull
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.