Literature DB >> 14567178

[Radiation dosage in orthopedics -- a comparison of computer-assisted procedures].

F Gebhard1, M Kraus, E Schneider, M Arand, L Kinzl, A Hebecker, L Bätz.   

Abstract

Since the 1990s, computer-assisted methods have been well-established in the field of orthopedics and traumatology. In addition to the proven improvement in the field of surgical precisioncompared with conventional techniques, the decrease in the amount of emitted ionizing radiation inside of the operating room was cited to constitute an additional major advantage of computer-based navigation. The goal of this study was to quantify X-ray dose values exposed during both conventional methods and computer-assisted procedures, the latter being performed using a C-arm device SIREMOBIL Iso-C3D (Siemens Medical Solutions). The clinical measurements were supplemented by laboratory experiments using a pinpoint ionization chamber placed inside a standard lucite phantom. The clinical part of the study investigated the application of new, i.e. computer assisted, techniques in comparison with conventional procedures on in total 42 patients experiencing surgery either on their lower extremities (n = 14) or on the spine (n = 28). The techniques applied were: (1) conventional surgical procedure, (2) CT-based navigation, (3) C-arm navigation, and (4) Iso-C3D-navigation. The main focus of the clinical evaluation was the determination of radiation dose values by means of thermoluminescence dose meters, accompanied by the registration of the operation times of the X-ray tube during a surgical intervention. The conclusions from the clinical studies are in agreement with the results from the laboratory measurements. Computer-assisted techniques led to a significant reduction in X-ray dose exposure and drastically shortened irradiation times. The most pronounced decrease in the emission of ionizing radiation was achieved in case of the Iso-C3D-navigation, which has only recently been introduced into clinical practice, i.e. during runtime of this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14567178     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-003-0606-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  20 in total

1.  Is intraoperative CT of posterior cervical spine instrumentation cost-effective and does it reduce complications?

Authors:  Andrew C Hecht; Steven M Koehler; Janelle C Laudone; Arthur Jenkins; Sheeraz Qureshi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  [Intraoperative three-dimensional navigation for pedicle screw placement].

Authors:  P A Grützner; T Beutler; K Wendl; J von Recum; A Wentzensen; L-P Nolte
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  O-arm(®)-based spinal navigation and intraoperative 3D-imaging: first experiences.

Authors:  O Gonschorek; S Hauck; U Spiegl; T Weiß; R Pätzold; V Bühren
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  [Clinical experience with the Siremobil Iso-C(3D) imaging system in pelvic surgery].

Authors:  U Stöckle; B König; A Schäffler; T Zschernack; N P Haas
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  [Evaluation of image quality of the Iso C3D image processor in comparison to computer tomography. Use in the pelvic area].

Authors:  B König; U Erdmenger; R J Schröder; G Wienas; J Schaefer; M Pech; U Stöckle
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  [Computer-assisted screw placement into the posterior pelvic ring: assessment of different navigated procedures in a cadaver trial].

Authors:  D Briem; J M Rueger; P G C Begemann; Z Halata; T Bock; W Linhart; J Windolf
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  [Percutaneous, 2D-fluoroscopic navigated iliosacral screw placement in the supine position: technique, possibilities, and limits].

Authors:  D Briem; J Windolf; J M Rueger
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 8.  [Computed tomography of the musculoskeletal system].

Authors:  D Parsch; K Ludwig
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  [Comparison of C-arm CT and standard imaging in osteosyntheses of fractured distal radius specimens].

Authors:  S Wirth; E Euler; D Kotsianos-Hermle; M Treitl; U Linsenmaier; K-J Pfeifer; M Reiser; W Mutschler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 10.  Image-guided spine surgery: state of the art and future directions.

Authors:  Thorsten Tjardes; Sven Shafizadeh; Dieter Rixen; Thomas Paffrath; Bertil Bouillon; Eva S Steinhausen; Holger Baethis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.