BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of C-arm CT imaging of the distal radius with standard patient positioning in intraoperative assessment of plate osteosynthesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four complete distal radius specimens from human cadavers were fractured (type C), and internal fixation with palmar plates (stainless steel) was then carried out in each. On the basis of C-arm fluoroscopy, radiography and C-arm CT (Siremobil Iso-C3D, scans with forearm bones positioned parallel to the z-axis), 19 observers subsequently evaluated the positions of screws near the joint and any steps within the joint, after which the bones were surgically exposed and the imaging results checked against direct visual observations. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were detected either between the modalities or between the evaluator groups. CONCLUSION: With standard patient positioning, the performance of C-arm CT was equivalent to and not better than that of current standard procedures, i.e. intraoperative fluoroscopy and postoperative radiography. Further studies should examine whether this holds true in clinical practice with representative patient collectives when titanium implants are used and/or optimized patient positioning is practised.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of C-arm CT imaging of the distal radius with standard patient positioning in intraoperative assessment of plate osteosynthesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four complete distal radius specimens from human cadavers were fractured (type C), and internal fixation with palmar plates (stainless steel) was then carried out in each. On the basis of C-arm fluoroscopy, radiography and C-arm CT (Siremobil Iso-C3D, scans with forearm bones positioned parallel to the z-axis), 19 observers subsequently evaluated the positions of screws near the joint and any steps within the joint, after which the bones were surgically exposed and the imaging results checked against direct visual observations. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were detected either between the modalities or between the evaluator groups. CONCLUSION: With standard patient positioning, the performance of C-arm CT was equivalent to and not better than that of current standard procedures, i.e. intraoperative fluoroscopy and postoperative radiography. Further studies should examine whether this holds true in clinical practice with representative patient collectives when titanium implants are used and/or optimized patient positioning is practised.
Authors: Douglas R Dirschl; J Lawrence Marsh; Joseph A Buckwalter; Richard Gelberman; Steven A Olson; Thomas D Brown; Adolpho Llinias Journal: J Am Acad Orthop Surg Date: 2004 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.020
Authors: Sebastian A Müller; Lars Adolfsson; Cornelia Baum; Magdalena Müller-Gerbl; Andreas M Müller; Daniel Rikli Journal: JB JS Open Access Date: 2021-05-05