Literature DB >> 14566425

Improvement of parenchymal and vascular enhancement using saline flush and power injection for multiple-detector-row abdominal CT.

Helmut Schoellnast1, Manfred Tillich, Hannes A Deutschmann, Uwe Stessel, Michael J Deutschmann, Gottfried J Schaffler, Renate Schoellnast, Martin M Uggowitzer.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine if a saline solution flush following low dose contrast material bolus improves parenchymal and vascular enhancement during abdominal multiple detector-row computed tomography (MDCT). Forty-one patients (24 men and 17 women; mean age 49 years, age range 27-86 years) underwent abdominal MDCT (collimation 4x5 mm, 15-mm table increment, reconstruction interval 5 mm, gantry rotation period 0.8 s) with a single- as well as with a double syringe power injector. Indication for examination were benign and malignant tumors and inflammatory diseases. Patients received 100 ml nonionic contrast material (300 mgI/ml) alone or pushed with 20 ml saline solution. Mean enhancement values for both protocols were measured in the liver, the spleen, the pancreas, the renal cortex, the portal vein, the inferior vena cava and the abdominal aorta. Double syringe power-injector protocol led to significantly higher parenchymal and vascular enhancement than single syringe power-injector protocol (p<0.05). The improvement in mean enhancement of the liver was 9 +/- 9 HU, of the spleen 8 +/- 10 HU, of the pancreas 7 +/- 9 HU, and of the renal cortex 8 +/- 20 HU. The improvement in mean enhancement of the portal vein was 10 +/- 17 HU of the inferior vena cava 8 +/- 13 HU and of the abdominal aorta 10 +/- 17 HU. The use of a double syringe power injector with saline flush following contrast material bolus significantly improves parenchymal and vascular enhancement during contrast-enhanced abdominal MDCT with low iodine doses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14566425     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-003-2085-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  21 in total

1.  Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of volume of low osmolality contrast medium needed for routine helical abdominal CT.

Authors:  A J Megibow; G Jacob; J P Heiken; E K Paulson; K D Hopper; G Sica; S Saini; B A Birnbaum; R Redvanley; E K Fishman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Optimization of automatic bolus tracking for timing of the arterial phase of helical liver CT.

Authors:  J J Sandstede; A Tschammler; M Beer; C Vogelsang; G Wittenberg; D Hahn
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Selective use of low-osmolar contrast media.

Authors:  J F Debatin; R H Cohan; R A Leder; C B Zakrzewski; N R Dunnick
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  Thoracic spiral CT: delivery of contrast material pushed with injectable saline solution in a power injector.

Authors:  K D Hopper; T J Mosher; C J Kasales; T R TenHave; D A Tully; J S Weaver
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Hepatic helical CT: effect of reduction of iodine dose of intravenous contrast material on hepatic contrast enhancement.

Authors:  P C Freeny; J C Gardner; G vonIngersleben; S Heyano; H V Nghiem; T C Winter
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Use of contrast material for spiral CT of the abdomen: comparison of hepatic enhancement and vascular attenuation for three different contrast media at two different delay times.

Authors:  B R Herts; D M Paushter; D M Einstein; R Zepp; R A Friedman; N Obuchowski
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Hepatic CT enhancement. Part I. Alterations in the volume of contrast material within the same patients.

Authors:  T P Chambers; R L Baron; R M Lush
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Prediction of optimal injection protocol for tumor detection in contrast-enhanced dynamic hepatic CT using simulation of lesion-to-liver contrast difference.

Authors:  S Kim; J H Kim; J K Han; K H Lee; B G Min
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.790

9.  Patient allergies: role in selective use of nonionic contrast material.

Authors:  J D Halpern; K D Hopper; M G Arredondo; J J Trautlein
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Dose requirements for a nonionic contrast agent for spiral computed tomography of the liver in rabbits.

Authors:  D A Bluemke; E K Fishman; J H Anderson
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 6.016

View more
  12 in total

1.  Comparison of two contrast materials with different iodine concentrations in enhancing the density of the the aorta, portal vein and liver at multi-detector row CT: a randomized study.

Authors:  Hiromasa Suzuki; Hidekazu Oshima; Norio Shiraki; Chisa Ikeya; Yuta Shibamoto
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-08-12       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Multidetector CT (64 Slices) of the liver: examination techniques.

Authors:  Andrea Laghi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Effect of varying injection rates of a saline chaser on aortic enhancement in CT angiography: phantom study.

Authors:  Sebastian T Schindera; Rendon C Nelson; Laurens Howle; Eli Nichols; David M DeLong; Elmar M Merkle
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Novel connecting tube for saline chaser in contrast-enhanced CT: the effect of spiral flow of saline on contrast enhancement.

Authors:  Masafumi Kidoh; Takeshi Nakaura; Kazuo Awai; Koji Yuba; Takayuki Kobayashi; Young-Kwang Park; Takanobu Yagi; Kazunori Harada; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Imaging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: State of the art.

Authors:  Eric Peter Tamm; Priya Ranjit Bhosale; Raghu Vikram; Leonardo Pimentel de Almeida Marcal; Aparna Balachandran
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2013-03-28

6.  Detection of liver metastases under 2 cm: comparison of different acquisition protocols in four row multidetector-CT (MDCT).

Authors:  Amina Abdelmoumene; Patrick Chevallier; Marc Chalaron; Frédéric Schneider; Francis R Verdun; Phillipe Frascarolo; Reto Meuli; Pierre Schnyder; Alban Denys
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  64-section multidetector CT of the upper abdomen: optimization of a saline chaser injection protocol for improved vascular and parenchymal contrast enhancement.

Authors:  Daniele Marin; Rendon C Nelson; Antonino Guerrisi; Huiman Barnhart; Sebastian T Schindera; Roberto Passariello; Carlo Catalano
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Prospective study comparing two iodine concentrations for multidetector computed tomography of the pancreas.

Authors:  Y Liu; X Q Xu; X Z Lin; Q Song; K M Chen
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 3.469

9.  An optimised patient-specific approach to administration of contrast agent for CT pulmonary angiography.

Authors:  Charbel Saade; Roger Bourne; Fadi El-Merhi; Arjuna Somanathan; Dev Chakraborty; Patrick Brennan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Late-arterial and portal-venous phase imaging of the liver with a multislice CT scanner in patients without circulatory disturbances: automatic bolus tracking or empirical scan delay?

Authors:  Shigeki Itoh; Mitsuru Ikeda; Masataka Achiwa; Hiroko Satake; Shingo Iwano; Takeo Ishigaki
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-04-06       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.