Literature DB >> 29515941

On the Inclusion of Short-distance Bystander Effects into a Logistic Tumor Control Probability Model.

David G Tempel1, N Patrik Brodin1, Wolfgang A Tomé1.   

Abstract

Currently, interactions between voxels are neglected in the tumor control probability (TCP) models used in biologically-driven intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment planning. However, experimental data suggests that this may not always be justified when bystander effects are important. We propose a model inspired by the Ising model, a short-range interaction model, to investigate if and when it is important to include voxel to voxel interactions in biologically-driven treatment planning. This Ising-like model for TCP is derived by first showing that the logistic model of tumor control is mathematically equivalent to a non-interacting Ising model. Using this correspondence, the parameters of the logistic model are mapped to the parameters of an Ising-like model and bystander interactions are introduced as a short-range interaction as is the case for the Ising model. As an example, we apply the model to study the effect of bystander interactions in the case of radiation therapy for prostate cancer. The model shows that it is adequate to neglect bystander interactions for dose distributions that completely cover the treatment target and yield TCP estimates that lie in the shoulder of the dose response curve. However, for dose distributions that yield TCP estimates that lie on the steep part of the dose response curve or for inhomogeneous dose distributions having significant hot and/or cold regions, bystander effects may be important. Furthermore, the proposed model highlights a previously unexplored and potentially fruitful connection between the fields of statistical mechanics and tumor control probability/normal tissue complication probability modeling.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bystander effect; ntcp; radiation response modeling; selective boosting; statistical mechanics; tcp

Year:  2018        PMID: 29515941      PMCID: PMC5832408          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  29 in total

1.  Low-dose studies of bystander cell killing with targeted soft X rays.

Authors:  G Schettino; M Folkard; K M Prise; B Vojnovic; K D Held; B D Michael
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 2.  The bystander effect.

Authors:  Eric J Hall
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  A mathematical framework for separating the direct and bystander components of cellular radiation response.

Authors:  Martin A Ebert; Natalka Suchowerska; Michael A Jackson; David R McKenzie
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 4.089

4.  Over the next decade the success of radiation treatment planning will be judged by the immediate biological response of tumor cells rather than by surrogate measures such as dose maximization and uniformity.

Authors:  C Clifton Ling; X Allen Li
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  Quantifying the position and steepness of radiation dose-response curves.

Authors:  S M Bentzen; S L Tucker
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.694

Review 6.  The linear-quadratic formula and progress in fractionated radiotherapy.

Authors:  J F Fowler
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Comparison of prostate IMRT and VMAT biologically optimised treatment plans.

Authors:  Nicholas Hardcastle; Wolfgang A Tomé; Kerwyn Foo; Andrew Miller; Martin Carolan; Peter Metcalfe
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 1.482

Review 8.  Genomic instability and bystander effects induced by high-LET radiation.

Authors:  Eric J Hall; Tom K Hei
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2003-10-13       Impact factor: 9.867

9.  On cold spots in tumor subvolumes.

Authors:  Wolfgang A Tomé; Jack F Fowler
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Fitting late rectal bleeding data using different NTCP models: results from an Italian multi-centric study (AIROPROS0101).

Authors:  T Rancati; C Fiorino; G Gagliardi; G M Cattaneo; G Sanguineti; V Casanova Borca; C Cozzarini; G Fellin; F Foppiano; G Girelli; L Menegotti; A Piazzolla; V Vavassori; R Valdagni
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.280

View more
  1 in total

1.  Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for recurrent and previously irradiated head and neck cancers.

Authors:  Anil Kumar Anand; Bharat Dua; Anil Kumar Bansal; Heigrujam Malhotra Singh; Amit Verma; Amit Kumar
Journal:  BJR Open       Date:  2020-03-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.