| Literature DB >> 26224941 |
N Malathi1, P Sahoo1, K Praveen1, N Murali1.
Abstract
The paper presents an innovative approach towards development of real time dosimetry using a chemical dosimeter for measurement of absorbed radiation dose in the range between 1 and 400 Gy. Saturated chloroform solution in water, a well known chemical dosimeter, is used to demonstrate the concept of online measurement of radiation dose. The measurement approach involves online monitoring of increase in conductivity of saturated chloroform solution due to progressive build up of traces of highly conducting HCl during exposure to gamma irradiation. A high performance pulsating sensor-based conductivity monitoring instrument has been used to monitor such real time change in conductivity of solution. A relation between conductivity shift and radiation dose has been established using radiochemical yield value (G value) of HCl. The G value of HCl in saturated chloroform dosimeter has been determined using laboratory developed pulsating sensor-based devices. In this connection dose rate of Co-60 gamma chamber was determined using Fricke dosimeter following a simple potentiometric measurement approach developed in-house besides conventional spectrophotometry. Results obtained from both measurement approaches agreed well. Complete instrumentation package has also been developed to measure real time radiation dose. The proposed real time radiation dosimeter is successfully tested in several measurement campaigns in order to assure its performance prior to its deployment in field.Entities:
Keywords: Absorbed radiation dose; Fricke dosimetry; G value of HCl; Pulsating conductivity meter; Real time chemical dosimeter
Year: 2013 PMID: 26224941 PMCID: PMC4513900 DOI: 10.1007/s10967-013-2531-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Radioanal Nucl Chem ISSN: 0236-5731 Impact factor: 1.371
Fig. 1Block diagram of measurement set up
Fig. 2Schematic diagram of oscillator circuit
Fig. 3Block diagram of data acquisition device
Fig. 4a Relation between pulse frequency and conductivity (range 0–80 μS cm−1). b Relation between pulse frequency and conductivity (range 80–250 μS cm−1)
Evaluation of dose rate of Co-60 gamma chamber by Fricke dosimetry (measurement by emf approach using potentiometric measurement technique)
| Irradiation time (min) | Frequencies (Hz) | Log |
| Concentration of Fe3+ (μM) | Dose rate (Gy h−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 3300 | −9.4861E−01 | 1.1256E−01 | 111 | 405.85 |
| 20 | 3475 | −6.2661E−01 | 2.3626E−01 | 210 | 383.31 |
| 30 | 3603 | −3.9109E−01 | 4.0636E−01 | 318 | 386.36 |
| 40 | 3695 | −2.2181E−01 | 6.0005E−01 | 413 | 376.10 |
| 50 | 3794 | −3.9650E−02 | 9.1275E−01 | 525 | 382.85 |
| 60 | 3910 | 1.7379E−01 | 1.4921E+00 | 659 | 400.30 |
| 70 | 4009 | 3.5595E−01 | 2.2696E+00 | 764 | 397.80 |
| 80 | 4140 | 5.9699E−01 | 3.9536E+00 | 878 | 400.21 |
Evaluation of dose rate of Co-60 gamma chamber by Fricke dosimetry (measurement by spectrophotometry)
| Irradiation time (min) | Absorbance | Concentration of Fe3+ (μM) | Dose rate (Gy h−1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 0.632 | 209.0 | 381.08 |
| 30 | 0.818 | 311.7 | 378.86 |
| 40 | 1.03 | 428.7 | 390.83 |
| 50 | 1.238 | 543.5 | 396.40 |
Fig. 5Relation between pulse frequency and ferric–ferrous ratio using digital potentiometry
Determination of G value of HCl in saturated chloroform dosimeter using conductivity measurement approach
| Irradiation time (s) | Sp. cond. before irradiation (μS cm−1) | Sp. cond. after irradiation (μS cm−1) | Sp. cond. due to HCl (μS cm−1) | Concentration of HCl (μM) | Absorbed dose (Gy) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 300 | 1.2199E+00 | 1.5184E+01 | 1.3964E+01 | 32.8 | 32.433 | 9.75 |
| 600 | 1.2199E+00 | 3.0874E+01 | 2.9654E+01 | 69.6 | 64.867 | 10.35 |
| 900 | 1.2199E+00 | 4.5777E+01 | 4.4557E+01 | 104.6 | 97.30 | 10.37 |
| 900 | 1.2428E+00 | 4.5665E+01 | 4.4422E+01 | 104.3 | 97.30 | 10.34 |
| 300 | 1.2326E+00 | 1.5805E+01 | 1.4573E+01 | 34.2 | 32.433 | 10.18 |
| 600 | 1.2071E+00 | 2.9680E+01 | 2.8473E+01 | 66.8 | 64.867 | 9.94 |
| 1,200 | 1.2071E+00 | 5.9949E+01 | 5.8742E+01 | 137.9 | 129.73 | 10.25 |
| 1,800 | 8.5389E−01 | 8.8970E+01 | 8.8116E+01 | 206.9 | 194.60 | 10.25 |
| 3,600 | 8.6172E−01 | 1.7920E+02 | 1.7834E+02 | 418.6 | 389.20 | 10.38 |
| 1,800 | 8.5128E−01 | 8.8166E+01 | 8.7315E+01 | 205 | 194.60 | 10.16 |
| 2,400 | 8.5128E−01 | 1.1703E+02 | 1.1618E+02 | 272.7 | 259.47 | 10.14 |
| 3,000 | 8.5128E−01 | 1.4617E+02 | 1.4531E+02 | 341.1 | 324.33 | 10.15 |
| 3,600 | 8.5128E−01 | 1.7284E+02 | 1.7199E+02 | 403.7 | 389.20 | 10.01 |
Determination of G value of HCl in saturated chloroform dosimeter using conductometric titration technique
| Irradiation time (min) | Absorbed dose (Gy) | End point | Drop volume (mL) | NaOH required (mL) | Concentration of NaOH (mM) | Concentration of HCl (mM) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | 97.3 | 42 | 0.007 | 0.294 | 0.87 | 0.102 | 10.14 |
| 30 | 194.6 | 45 | 0.007 | 0.315 | 1.74 | 0.219 | 10.86 |
| 60 | 389.2 | 35 | 0.007 | 0.245 | 0.435 | 0.0426 | 10.57 |
| 20 | 129.73 | 26 | 0.013 | 0.338 | 1.0 | 0.135 | 10.05 |
| 10 | 64.87 | 13 | 0.013 | 0.169 | 1.0 | 0.0067 | 10.05 |
Summary of results from a series of irradiated saturated chloroform solutions (irradiated in Co-60 gamma chamber)
| Time of irradiation (min) | Conductivity of pre-irradiated solution (μS cm−1) | Conductivity after irradiation (μS cm−1) | Shift in conductivity (μS cm−1) | Concentration of HCl (μM) | Dose (Gy) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.5 | 1.22 | 5.73 | 4.51 | 10.6 | 10.01 |
| 8 | 1.13 | 24.03 | 22.9 | 53.8 | 50.84 |
| 12 | 1.18 | 35.23 | 34.05 | 79.9 | 75.6 |
| 24 | 1.25 | 71.6 | 70.35 | 165.0 | 156.19 |
| 36 | 1.23 | 103.46 | 102.23 | 240.0 | 226.97 |
| 52 | 1.16 | 151.68 | 150.52 | 353.0 | 334.18 |
| 64 | 1.2 | 186.2 | 185.0 | 434.0 | 410.73 |
Fig. 6Linear increase in radiation dose with respect to irradiation time in a typical online measurement campaign