Literature DB >> 21344226

[TKA revision of semiconstraint components using the 3-step technique].

R Hube1, G Matziolis, T Kalteis, H O Mayr.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The surgical goal is to achieve a pain free and stable knee joint after revision total knee arthroplasty in three steps. An important component of the technique is the reproducible restoration of the joint line. INDICATIONS: Revision total knee arthroplasty. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Complete bone loss at the knee joint (epicondyles and tibia plateau), persistent joint infection, loss of the extension apparatus, and neurological disease with progressive ligament instability. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Implantation of revision components is performed in three steps. The first step is the positioning of the tibia component at the correct height and rotation. As the position of the tibial articular surface is independent of the knee position, the tibia serves as a reference both in extension and in flexion. The second step consists of balancing the knee joint in flexion and, thereby, definition of the flexion gap and the rotation of the femoral component. In the third step, the reconstruction and balancing of the knee joint in extension is performed. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Mobilization with weight bearing and range of motion as tolerated depending on osseous and soft tissue condition at surgery. The surgical technique does not influence the further treatment.
RESULTS: In a prospective study, 168 consecutive knee revisions operated by the first author were examined clinically and radiologically preoperatively and at a mean follow-up of 38 months (range 22-61 months). There were 96 knees from women and 72 were from men with an average age of 74.6 years (range 51-92 years). Clinical results were based on the American Knee Society score. The score showed 47.6 (range 32-63) preoperatively and 81.5 (range 62-95) at follow-up. Radiologically, 92.7% of the knees showed a malposition <3°. The joint line was correctly reconstructed in 86.3% based on the preoperative plan; 89% of the patella showed correct tracking in the patella tangential view.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21344226     DOI: 10.1007/s00064-010-0002-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol        ISSN: 0934-6694            Impact factor:   1.154


  32 in total

1.  Revision total knee arthroplasty: fixation with modular stems.

Authors:  Wade T Gofton; Harry Tsigaras; R Allen Butler; James J Patterson; Robert L Barrack; Cecil H Rorabeck
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Mechanical alignment of tibial stems in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Brian S Parsley; Nobuhiko Sugano; Roberto Bertolusso; Michael A Conditt
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  [Modular revision systems in total knee arthroplasty. Possibilities and techniques].

Authors:  R Hube; H Reichel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  The management of bone loss in revision total knee replacement.

Authors:  J P Whittaker; R Dharmarajan; A D Toms
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-08

5.  Revision total knee arthroplasty with a cemented posterior-stabilized or constrained condylar prosthesis: a minimum 3-year and average 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  C L Peters; R Hennessey; R M Barden; J O Galante; A G Rosenberg
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Survivorship of cemented knee replacements.

Authors:  G R Scuderi; J N Insall; R E Windsor; M C Moran
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1989-11

7.  Revision total knee arthroplasty for aseptic failure.

Authors:  M A Jacobs; D S Hungerford; K A Krackow; D W Lennox
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Optimizing patellofemoral tracking during total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Gwo-Chin Lee; Fred D Cushner; Giles R Scuderi; John N Insall
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R A Berger; L S Crossett; J J Jacobs; H E Rubash
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Cementless meniscal bearing knee arthroplasty: 7- to 12-year outcome analysis.

Authors:  F F Buechel
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  3 in total

1.  [Defect Reconstruction in Total Knee Arthroplasty with wedges and blocks]. [Corrected].

Authors:  R Hube; T Pfitzner; P von Roth; H O Mayr
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 1.154

2.  Influence of intentional femoral component flexion in navigated TKA on gap balance and sagittal anatomy.

Authors:  J Roßkopf; P K Singh; P Wolf; M Strauch; H Graichen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Intentional Femoral Component Flexion - A Method to Balance the Flexion-extension Gap in Navigated Total Knee Replacement.

Authors:  Praveen Ramia Govardhan; Govardhan Ramia Harigovindarao
Journal:  J Orthop Case Rep       Date:  2020 Aug-Sep
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.