Literature DB >> 14559778

Bioinformatics analysis of experimentally determined protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Zoltán Dezso1, Zoltán N Oltvai, Albert-László Barabási.   

Abstract

Many important cellular functions are implemented by protein complexes that act as sophisticated molecular machines of varying size and temporal stability. Here we demonstrate quantitatively that protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae are comprised of a core in which subunits are highly coexpressed, display the same deletion phenotype (essential or nonessential), and share identical functional classification and cellular localization. This core is surrounded by a functionally mixed group of proteins, which likely represent short-lived or spurious attachments. The results allow us to define the deletion phenotype and cellular task of most known complexes, and to identify with high confidence the biochemical role of hundreds of proteins with yet unassigned functionality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14559778      PMCID: PMC403764          DOI: 10.1101/gr.1073603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  23 in total

Review 1.  Computational studies of gene regulatory networks: in numero molecular biology.

Authors:  J Hasty; D McMillen; F Isaacs; J J Collins
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Fundamental patterns underlying gene expression profiles: simplicity from complexity.

Authors:  N S Holter; M Mitra; A Maritan; M Cieplak; J R Banavar; N V Fedoroff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-07-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Functional discovery via a compendium of expression profiles.

Authors:  T R Hughes; M J Marton; A R Jones; C J Roberts; R Stoughton; C D Armour; H A Bennett; E Coffey; H Dai; Y D He; M J Kidd; A M King; M R Meyer; D Slade; P Y Lum; S B Stepaniants; D D Shoemaker; D Gachotte; K Chakraburtty; J Simon; M Bard; S H Friend
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-07-07       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Relating whole-genome expression data with protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Ronald Jansen; Dov Greenbaum; Mark Gerstein
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Is there a bias in proteome research?

Authors:  R Mrowka; A Patzak; H Herzel
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 6.  Cryo-electron microscopy as an investigative tool: the ribosome as an example.

Authors:  J Frank
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.345

7.  Lethality and centrality in protein networks.

Authors:  H Jeong; S P Mason; A L Barabási; Z N Oltvai
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-05-03       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  MIPS: a database for genomes and protein sequences.

Authors:  H W Mewes; D Frishman; U Güldener; G Mannhaupt; K Mayer; M Mokrejs; B Morgenstern; M Münsterkötter; S Rudd; B Weil
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Correlation between transcriptome and interactome mapping data from Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  H Ge; Z Liu; G M Church; M Vidal
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  A relationship between gene expression and protein interactions on the proteome scale: analysis of the bacteriophage T7 and the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  A Grigoriev
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  41 in total

1.  Deciphering the Arabidopsis floral transition process by integrating a protein-protein interaction network and gene expression data.

Authors:  Fei He; Yuan Zhou; Ziding Zhang
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  A predicted interactome for Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Jane Geisler-Lee; Nicholas O'Toole; Ron Ammar; Nicholas J Provart; A Harvey Millar; Matt Geisler
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Novel specificities emerge by stepwise duplication of functional modules.

Authors:  José B Pereira-Leal; Sarah A Teichmann
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Predicting essential genes in fungal genomes.

Authors:  Michael Seringhaus; Alberto Paccanaro; Anthony Borneman; Michael Snyder; Mark Gerstein
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-08-09       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 5.  Unravelling the world of cis-regulatory elements.

Authors:  Zhao Wang; Gong-Hong Wei; De-Pei Liu; Chih-Chuan Liang
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Discovery of protein complexes with core-attachment structures from Tandem Affinity Purification (TAP) data.

Authors:  Min Wu; Xiao-Li Li; Chee-Keong Kwoh; See-Kiong Ng; Limsoon Wong
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 1.479

7.  Comparative evolutionary analysis of protein complexes in E. coli and yeast.

Authors:  Adam J Reid; Juan Ag Ranea; Christine A Orengo
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Computational approaches for detecting protein complexes from protein interaction networks: a survey.

Authors:  Xiaoli Li; Min Wu; Chee-Keong Kwoh; See-Kiong Ng
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Exploiting gene deletion fitness effects in yeast to understand the modular architecture of protein complexes under different growth conditions.

Authors:  Roland A Pache; M Madan Babu; Patrick Aloy
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2009-07-18

10.  A core-attachment based method to detect protein complexes in PPI networks.

Authors:  Min Wu; Xiaoli Li; Chee-Keong Kwoh; See-Kiong Ng
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.