Literature DB >> 21777084

Discovery of protein complexes with core-attachment structures from Tandem Affinity Purification (TAP) data.

Min Wu1, Xiao-Li Li, Chee-Keong Kwoh, See-Kiong Ng, Limsoon Wong.   

Abstract

Many cellular functions involve protein complexes that are formed by multiple interacting proteins. Tandem Affinity Purification (TAP) is a popular experimental method for detecting such multi-protein interactions. However, current computational methods that predict protein complexes from TAP data require converting the co-complex relationships in TAP data into binary interactions. The resulting pairwise protein-protein interaction (PPI) network is then mined for densely connected regions that are identified as putative protein complexes. Converting the TAP data into PPI data not only introduces errors but also loses useful information about the underlying multi-protein relationships that can be exploited to detect the internal organization (i.e., core-attachment structures) of protein complexes. In this article, we propose a method called CACHET that detects protein complexes with Core-AttaCHment structures directly from bipartitETAP data. CACHET models the TAP data as a bipartite graph in which the two vertex sets are the baits and the preys, respectively. The edges between the two vertex sets represent bait-prey relationships. CACHET first focuses on detecting high-quality protein-complex cores from the bipartite graph. To minimize the effects of false positive interactions, the bait-prey relationships are indexed with reliability scores. Only non-redundant, reliable bicliques computed from the TAP bipartite graph are regarded as protein-complex cores. CACHET constructs protein complexes by including attachment proteins into the cores. We applied CACHET on large-scale TAP datasets and found that CACHET outperformed existing methods in terms of prediction accuracy (i.e., F-measure and functional homogeneity of predicted complexes). In addition, the protein complexes predicted by CACHET are equipped with core-attachment structures that provide useful biological insights into the inherent functional organization of protein complexes. Our supplementary material can be found at http://www1.i2r.a-star.edu.sg/~xlli/CACHET/CACHET.htm ; binary executables can also be found there. Supplementary Material is also available at www.liebertonline.com/cmb.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21777084      PMCID: PMC3440013          DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2010.0293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Biol        ISSN: 1066-5277            Impact factor:   1.479


  30 in total

1.  Architecture of RNA polymerase II and implications for the transcription mechanism.

Authors:  P Cramer; D A Bushnell; J Fu; A L Gnatt; B Maier-Davis; N E Thompson; R R Burgess; A M Edwards; P R David; R D Kornberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-04-28       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  A combined experimental and computational strategy to define protein interaction networks for peptide recognition modules.

Authors:  Amy Hin Yan Tong; Becky Drees; Giuliano Nardelli; Gary D Bader; Barbara Brannetti; Luisa Castagnoli; Marie Evangelista; Silvia Ferracuti; Bryce Nelson; Serena Paoluzi; Michele Quondam; Adriana Zucconi; Christopher W V Hogue; Stanley Fields; Charles Boone; Gianni Cesareni
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-12-13       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  The tandem affinity purification (TAP) method: a general procedure of protein complex purification.

Authors:  O Puig; F Caspary; G Rigaut; B Rutz; E Bouveret; E Bragado-Nilsson; M Wilm; B Séraphin
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.608

4.  Protein complexes and functional modules in molecular networks.

Authors:  Victor Spirin; Leonid A Mirny
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-09-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  The nuclear pore complex: nucleocytoplasmic transport and beyond.

Authors:  Birthe Fahrenkrog; Ueli Aebi
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 94.444

6.  Detection of functional modules from protein interaction networks.

Authors:  Jose B Pereira-Leal; Anton J Enright; Christos A Ouzounis
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-01-01

7.  GO::TermFinder--open source software for accessing Gene Ontology information and finding significantly enriched Gene Ontology terms associated with a list of genes.

Authors:  Elizabeth I Boyle; Shuai Weng; Jeremy Gollub; Heng Jin; David Botstein; J Michael Cherry; Gavin Sherlock
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-08-05       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes.

Authors:  Anne-Claude Gavin; Markus Bösche; Roland Krause; Paola Grandi; Martina Marzioch; Andreas Bauer; Jörg Schultz; Jens M Rick; Anne-Marie Michon; Cristina-Maria Cruciat; Marita Remor; Christian Höfert; Malgorzata Schelder; Miro Brajenovic; Heinz Ruffner; Alejandro Merino; Karin Klein; Manuela Hudak; David Dickson; Tatjana Rudi; Volker Gnau; Angela Bauch; Sonja Bastuck; Bettina Huhse; Christina Leutwein; Marie-Anne Heurtier; Richard R Copley; Angela Edelmann; Erich Querfurth; Vladimir Rybin; Gerard Drewes; Manfred Raida; Tewis Bouwmeester; Peer Bork; Bertrand Seraphin; Bernhard Kuster; Gitte Neubauer; Giulio Superti-Furga
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-10       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Bioinformatics analysis of experimentally determined protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Zoltán Dezso; Zoltán N Oltvai; Albert-László Barabási
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-10-14       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  An automated method for finding molecular complexes in large protein interaction networks.

Authors:  Gary D Bader; Christopher W V Hogue
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-01-13       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  9 in total

1.  PLW: Probabilistic Local Walks for detecting protein complexes from protein interaction networks.

Authors:  Daniel Wong; Xiao-Li Li; Min Wu; Jie Zheng; See-Kiong Ng
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.969

2.  Protein complex identification by integrating protein-protein interaction evidence from multiple sources.

Authors:  Bo Xu; Hongfei Lin; Yang Chen; Zhihao Yang; Hongfang Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A two-layer integration framework for protein complex detection.

Authors:  Le Ou-Yang; Min Wu; Xiao-Fei Zhang; Dao-Qing Dai; Xiao-Li Li; Hong Yan
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Detecting protein complexes with multiple properties by an adaptive harmony search algorithm.

Authors:  Rongquan Wang; Caixia Wang; Huimin Ma
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 3.307

5.  Small protein complex prediction algorithm based on protein-protein interaction network segmentation.

Authors:  Jiaqing Lyu; Zhen Yao; Bing Liang; Yiwei Liu; Yijia Zhang
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 3.307

6.  Towards a Hierarchical Strategy to Explore Multi-Scale IP/MS Data for Protein Complexes.

Authors:  Joachim Kutzera; Age K Smilde; Tom F Wilderjans; Huub C J Hoefsloot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A comparative analysis of computational approaches and algorithms for protein subcomplex identification.

Authors:  Nazar Zaki; Antonio Mora
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Identification of protein complexes from multi-relationship protein interaction networks.

Authors:  Xueyong Li; Jianxin Wang; Bihai Zhao; Fang-Xiang Wu; Yi Pan
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 4.639

9.  Protein complex detection based on partially shared multi-view clustering.

Authors:  Le Ou-Yang; Xiao-Fei Zhang; Dao-Qing Dai; Meng-Yun Wu; Yuan Zhu; Zhiyong Liu; Hong Yan
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 3.169

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.