Literature DB >> 14558598

Prediction of pathology and survival by FDG PET in gliomas.

M V Padma1, S Said, M Jacobs, D R Hwang, K Dunigan, M Satter, B Christian, J Ruppert, T Bernstein, G Kraus, J C Mantil.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Despite being in use for nearly two decades, the utility of [18F]2-fluoro-2deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) in the evaluation and treatment of brain tumors remains controversial. We retrospectively analyzed all patients with histologically proven gliomas, between the years 1990 and 2000, who underwent FDG PET studies at various stages of their treatment and who were followed till either death or for a minimum period of 1 year in an attempt to bring resolution to this controversy.
METHODS: All PET scans prior to 1997 were acquired on an ECAT 951/31 scanner in 2D. Scans since 1997 were obtained on a Siemens HR+ scanner in 3D mode. The majority of FDG PET scans were co-registered with the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans to aid in diagnosis and therapy. Based on independent visual inspection, two board certified nuclear medicine physicians graded the highest activity level of the tumor using the metabolic grading: 0 = no uptake; 1 = uptake less or equal to normal white matter; 2 = uptake greater than normal white matter and less than gray matter; 3 = uptake equal to or greater than gray mater. The measure of association of lambda (lambda) was used to measure the strength of predictive ability of FDG PET for pathological grading of the gliomas. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to assess the significance of grade of uptake on survival.
RESULTS: A total of 331 patients were analyzed of which 137 had a PET scan prior to histological diagnosis and therapeutic intervention (mean age = 46.5 years; M:F = 1.7:1). Eighty six percent (143/166) of the patients with low uptake (metabolic scores 0,1) had low-grade gliomas (grade I,II) and 14% (23/166) high-grade gliomas (grade III,IV) on histologic examination. Ninety four percent (154/165) of the patients with high uptake (metabolic scores 2,3) on PET had high-grade gliomas and 7% (11/165) had low-grade gliomas on histologic examination. The grade of uptake had increasing significance on survival as the level increased from 'low' to 'high' (P = 0.0009). Ninety four percent (156/166) of the patients with low uptake survived for > 1 year (median survival of 28 months) and 19% survived for > 5 years. Only 29% (48/165) of patients with high uptake survived for > 1 year, (median survival of 11 months) and none survived for > 5 years. Irrespective of when the scan showed a high uptake of FDG, before or after intervention, the prognosis following that scan was poor.
CONCLUSIONS: Our observations confirm the utility of FDG PET as a prognostic tool for the histological grading and survival in patients with gliomas and appears to more than complement pathological grading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14558598     DOI: 10.1023/a:1025665820001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  24 in total

1.  Comparison of visual and ROI-based brain tumour grading using 18F-FDG PET: ROC analyses.

Authors:  P T Meyer; M Schreckenberger; U Spetzger; G F Meyer; O Sabri; K S Setani; T Zeggel; U Buell
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  2001-02

2.  FDG-PET in oncology: there's more to it than looking at pictures.

Authors:  A J Fischman; N M Alpert
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  FDG transport and phosphorylation in human gliomas measured with dynamic PET.

Authors:  K Herholz; J Rudolf; W D Heiss
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  PET of malignant cerebral tumors after interstitial brachytherapy. Demonstration of metabolic activity and correlation with clinical outcome.

Authors:  P E Valk; T F Budinger; V A Levin; P Silver; P H Gutin; W K Doyle
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Use of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with primary malignant brain tumors.

Authors:  T J Janus; E E Kim; R Tilbury; J M Bruner; W K Yung
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 10.422

6.  Glucose utilization of cerebral gliomas measured by [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography.

Authors:  G Di Chiro; R L DeLaPaz; R A Brooks; L Sokoloff; P L Kornblith; B H Smith; N J Patronas; C V Kufta; R M Kessler; G S Johnston; R G Manning; A P Wolf
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 7.  PET: brain tumor biochemistry.

Authors:  U Roelcke
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  Acute changes in glucose uptake after treatment: the effects of carmustine (BCNU) on human glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  J M Rozental; J D Cohen; M P Mehta; R L Levine; J M Hanson; R J Nickles
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.130

9.  Efficient stereospecific synthesis of no-carrier-added 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose using aminopolyether supported nucleophilic substitution.

Authors:  K Hamacher; H H Coenen; G Stöcklin
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Correlation of glucose consumption and tumor cell density in astrocytomas. A stereotactic PET study.

Authors:  K Herholz; U Pietrzyk; J Voges; R Schröder; M Halber; H Treuer; V Sturm; W D Heiss
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  81 in total

1.  Independent prognostic value of pre-treatment 18-FDG-PET in high-grade gliomas.

Authors:  Cécile Colavolpe; Philippe Metellus; Julien Mancini; Maryline Barrie; Céline Béquet-Boucard; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Olivier Mundler; Olivier Chinot; Eric Guedj
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  MRI-suspected low-grade glioma: is there a need to perform dynamic FET PET?

Authors:  Nathalie L Jansen; Vera Graute; Lena Armbruster; Bogdana Suchorska; Juergen Lutz; Sabina Eigenbrod; Paul Cumming; Peter Bartenstein; Jörg-Christian Tonn; Friedrich Wilhelm Kreth; Christian la Fougère
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  ¹⁸F-Fluoromisonidazole positron emission tomography may differentiate glioblastoma multiforme from less malignant gliomas.

Authors:  Kenji Hirata; Shunsuke Terasaka; Tohru Shiga; Naoya Hattori; Keiichi Magota; Hiroyuki Kobayashi; Shigeru Yamaguchi; Kiyohiro Houkin; Shinya Tanaka; Yuji Kuge; Nagara Tamaki
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Multimodality Brain Tumor Imaging: MR Imaging, PET, and PET/MR Imaging.

Authors:  James R Fink; Mark Muzi; Melinda Peck; Kenneth A Krohn
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  A surgical strategy using a fusion image constructed from 11C-methionine PET, 18F-FDG-PET and MRI for glioma with no or minimum contrast enhancement.

Authors:  Makoto Ideguchi; Takafumi Nishizaki; Norio Ikeda; Tomomi Okamura; Yasue Tanaka; Natsumi Fujii; Machiko Ohno; Taichi Shimabukuro; Tokuhiro Kimura; Eiji Ikeda; Kazuyoshi Suga
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  The roles of 11C-acetate PET/CT in predicting tumor differentiation and survival in patients with cerebral glioma.

Authors:  Soyoung Kim; Dongwoo Kim; Se Hoon Kim; Mi-Ae Park; Jong Hee Chang; Mijin Yun
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  Molecular imaging of gliomas with PET: opportunities and limitations.

Authors:  Christian la Fougère; Bogdana Suchorska; Peter Bartenstein; Friedrich-Wilhelm Kreth; Jörg-Christian Tonn
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 8.  Molecular imaging of brain tumors: a bridge between clinical and molecular medicine?

Authors:  B J Schaller; M Modo; M Buchfelder
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  Feasibility of multi-parametric PET and MRI for prediction of tumour recurrence in patients with glioblastoma.

Authors:  Michael Lundemann; Per Munck Af Rosenschöld; Aida Muhic; Vibeke A Larsen; Hans S Poulsen; Svend-Aage Engelholm; Flemming L Andersen; Andreas Kjær; Henrik B W Larsson; Ian Law; Adam E Hansen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  FDG-PET to predict different patterns of progression in multicentric glioblastoma: a case report.

Authors:  Cécile Colavolpe; Eric Guedj; Philippe Metellus; Maryline Barrie; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Olivier Mundler; Olivier Chinot
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 4.130

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.