Literature DB >> 17203238

Molecular imaging of brain tumors: a bridge between clinical and molecular medicine?

B J Schaller1, M Modo, M Buchfelder.   

Abstract

As the research on cellular changes has shed invaluable light on the pathophysiology and biochemistry of brain tumors, clinical and experimental use of molecular imaging methods is expanding and allows quantitative assessment. The term molecular imaging is defined as the in vivo characterization and measurement of biologic processes at the cellular and molecular level. Molecular imaging sets forth to probe the molecular abnormalities that are the basis of disease rather than to visualize the end effects of these molecular alterations and, therefore, provides different additional biochemical or molecular information about primary brain tumors compared to histological methods "classical" neuroradiological diagnostic studies. Common clinical indications for molecular imaging contain primary brain tumor diagnosis and identification of the metabolically most active brain tumor reactions (differentiation of viable tumor tissue from necrosis), prediction of treatment response by measurement of tumor perfusion, or ischemia. The interesting key question remains not only whether the magnitude of biochemical alterations demonstrated by molecular imaging reveals prognostic value with respect to survival, but also whether it identifies early disease and differentiates benign from malignant lesions. Moreover, an early identification of treatment success or failure by molecular imaging could significantly influence patient management by providing more objective decision criteria for evaluation of specific therapeutic strategies. Specially, as molecular imaging represents a novel technology for visualizing metabolism and signal transduction to gene expression, reporter gene assays are used to trace the location and temporal level of expression of therapeutic and endogenous genes. Molecular imaging probes and drugs are being developed to image the function of targets without disturbing them and in mass amounts to modify the target's function as a drug. Molecular imaging helps to close the gap between in vitro and in vivo integrative biology of disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17203238     DOI: 10.1007/s11307-006-0069-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol        ISSN: 1536-1632            Impact factor:   3.488


  128 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Imaging-guided convection-enhanced delivery and gene therapy of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Juergen Voges; Regina Reszka; Axel Gossmann; Claus Dittmar; Raphaela Richter; Guido Garlip; Lutz Kracht; Heinz H Coenen; Volker Sturm; Karl Wienhard; Wolf-Dieter Heiss; Andreas H Jacobs
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 10.422

Review 3.  Molecular-genetic imaging: current and future perspectives.

Authors:  Ronald G Blasberg; Juri Gelovani Tjuvajev
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 4.  In vivo monitoring of cellular transplants by magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Michel Modo; Toby J Roberts; Jasdeep K Sandhu; Steve C R Williams
Journal:  Expert Opin Biol Ther       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.388

5.  111In oxine labelled mesenchymal stem cell SPECT after intravenous administration in myocardial infarction.

Authors:  B B Chin; Y Nakamoto; J W M Bulte; M F Pittenger; R Wahl; D L Kraitchman
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.690

6.  A multimodal nanoparticle for preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative optical brain tumor delineation.

Authors:  Moritz F Kircher; Umar Mahmood; Raymond S King; Ralph Weissleder; Lee Josephson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Clinical usefulness of 11C-MET PET and 201T1 SPECT for differentiation of recurrent glioma from radiation necrosis.

Authors:  Y Sonoda; T Kumabe; T Takahashi; R Shirane; T Yoshimoto
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.742

8.  Fluorodeoxyglucose imaging of advanced head and neck cancer after chemotherapy.

Authors:  U Haberkorn; L G Strauss; A Dimitrakopoulou; E Seiffert; F Oberdorfer; S Ziegler; C Reisser; J Doll; F Helus; G van Kaick
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Positron emission tomography and computed tomography in differential diagnosis between recurrent or residual glioma and treatment-induced brain lesions.

Authors:  A Lilja; H Lundqvist; Y Olsson; B Spännare; P Gullberg; B Långström
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1989 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.990

Review 10.  Molecular imaging of gliomas.

Authors:  A H Jacobs; C Dittmar; A Winkeler; G Garlip; W D Heiss
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.488

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Specific biomarkers of receptors, pathways of inhibition and targeted therapies: pre-clinical developments.

Authors:  Y Waerzeggers; P Monfared; T Viel; A Faust; K Kopka; M Schäfers; B Tavitian; A Winkeler; A Jacobs
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Stem cell transplantation in neuroscience: the role of molecular imaging.

Authors:  Nora Sandu; Toma Spiriev; Bernhard Schaller
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.739

3.  Molecular medicine successes in neuroscience.

Authors:  Bernhard Schaller; Jan F Cornelius; Nora Sandu
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.354

Review 4.  Stem cell transplantation in brain tumors: a new field for molecular imaging?

Authors:  Nora Sandu; Bernhard Schaller
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 6.354

Review 5.  Current molecular imaging of spinal tumors in clinical practice.

Authors:  Nora Sandu; Gabriele Pöpperl; Marie-Elisabeth Toubert; Toma Spiriev; Belachew Arasho; Mikael Orabi; Bernhard Schaller
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2011-01-03       Impact factor: 6.354

Review 6.  Use of radionuclides in cancer research and treatment.

Authors:  M T Macías
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.405

7.  Molecular imaging of stem cell therapy in brain tumors: a step towards personalized medicine.

Authors:  Nora Sandu; Bernhard Schaller
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2012-09-08       Impact factor: 3.318

8.  Hints on new applications of emission tomography and magnetic resonance in neuro-oncology.

Authors:  Giovanni Lucignani
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Molecular imaging for stem cell therapy in the brain.

Authors:  Nora Sandu; Tumul Chowdhury; Bernhard Schaller
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 6.832

10.  Strategies for molecular imaging dementia and neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Bernhard J Schaller
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.