Literature DB >> 14555253

Characteristics of a prevalent vertebral deformity predict subsequent vertebral fracture: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS).

Mark Lunt1, Terence W O'Neill, Dieter Felsenberg, Jonathan Reeve, John A Kanis, Cyrus Cooper, Alan J Silman.   

Abstract

The presence of a prevalent vertebral deformity increases the risk of a future vertebral fracture. The aim of this study was to determine whether certain characteristics of the prevalent deformity, including its shape and location in the spine, influenced this effect. The 3100 men and 3500 women who took part in this analysis were recruited from population registers for participation in the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS). Subjects had lateral thoracic and lumbar spine x-rays at baseline, and again after a mean interval of 3.8 years. Prevalent morphometric vertebral deformities on the baseline film were identified by the McCloskey-Kanis method. Incident fractures were defined as vertebrae that also satisfied the McCloskey-Kanis criterion for prevalent deformities on the follow-up film, and in addition had at least one height (anterior, mid, or posterior) which had reduced by at least 20% between films. Poisson regression was used to assess the association between various characteristics of the prevalent deformity and the risk of an incident vertebral fracture, with generalised estimating equations used to allow for the fact that each subject contributed several vertebrae to the analysis. The risk of an incident fracture increased with the number of prevalent deformities: relative risk (RR) for one prevalent deformity 3.2 (95% confidence interval (CI); 2.1, 4.8); 9.8 (95% CI;6.1, 15.8) for 2; and 23.3 (95% CI;15.3, 35.4) for 3 or more. Relative risks differed significantly according to the shape of the prevalent deformity, ranging from 5.9 (95% CI; 4.1, 8.6) if the anterior and mid heights were reduced to 1.6 (95% CI;0.8, 3.2) if the posterior and mid heights were reduced. Risks varied also according to the severity of the deformity. There were fivefold differences in relative risk of incident fracture depending on the location of the prevalent deformity within the spine. Compared to vertebrae in subjects with no deformities at baseline, the relative risk of an incident fracture within three vertebrae of a prevalent deformity was greater (7.7 (95% CI;5.6, 10.5)) than the risk in more distant vertebrae (4.0 (95% CI;2.6, 6.0)). In summary, the risk of a subsequent vertebral fracture in individuals with preexisting deformities is importantly influenced by the characteristics of these deformities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14555253     DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(03)00248-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  69 in total

1.  Safety of balloon kyphoplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in Europe: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Carmen Bouza; Teresa López-Cuadrado; Nuria Almendro; José María Amate
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Prevalent vertebral fractures predict subsequent radiographic vertebral fractures in postmenopausal Korean women receiving antiresorptive agent.

Authors:  S H Kim; H S Choi; Y Rhee; K J Kim; S-K Lim
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Quality and performance measures in bone densitometry. Part 2: fracture risk.

Authors:  C C Glüer; Y Lu; K Engelke
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  An update on the assessment of osteoporosis using radiologic techniques.

Authors:  John Damilakis; Thomas G Maris; Apostolos H Karantanas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty: how good is the evidence?

Authors:  Fergus E McKiernan
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 6.  The vertebral fracture cascade in osteoporosis: a review of aetiopathogenesis.

Authors:  A M Briggs; A M Greig; J D Wark
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Detection of osteoporotic vertebral fractures using multidetector CT.

Authors:  J S Bauer; D Müller; A Ambekar; M Dobritz; M Matsuura; F Eckstein; E J Rummeny; T M Link
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-12-31       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Risk factors of new symptomatic vertebral compression fractures in osteoporotic patients undergone percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Hai-long Ren; Jian-ming Jiang; Jian-ting Chen; Ji-xing Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Reduction of pain and fracture incidence after kyphoplasty: 1-year outcomes of a prospective controlled trial of patients with primary osteoporosis.

Authors:  Ingo A Grafe; Katharina Da Fonseca; Jochen Hillmeier; Peter-Jürgen Meeder; Martin Libicher; Gerd Nöldge; Hubert Bardenheuer; Walter Pyerin; Linus Basler; Christel Weiss; Rod S Taylor; Peter Nawroth; Christian Kasperk
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  [Kyphoplasty : method for minimally invasive treatment of painful vertebral fractures].

Authors:  C Kasperk; G Nöldge; P Meeder; P Nawroth; F X Huber
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.