Literature DB >> 16821004

Quality and performance measures in bone densitometry. Part 2: fracture risk.

C C Glüer1, Y Lu, K Engelke.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This is part 2 of a core chapter of the forthcoming Report on Bone Densitometry commissioned by the International Commission on Radiation Units (ICRU). It is written with the aim to review definitions of quantities and units used in bone densitometry research and to describe parameters and methods that can be used to compare and standardize densitometric equipment and measurements. Part 2 of this chapter contains the section on fracture risk. PERFORMANCE MEASURES IN THE ASSESSMENT OF FRACTURE RISK: Building on concepts of risk assessment, including risk ratios and odds ratios, we review statistical concepts commonly used in cross-sectional and prospective fracture studies. Performance measures are defined that allow a comparison of the ability of densitometry techniques to assess fracture risk. DISCUSSION: The methods of discriminant analysis, logistic regression, Poisson regression models, and the Cox proportional hazard model are presented and compared. In addition, statistical concepts to characterize risk for the individual patient are reviewed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16821004     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-005-0038-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  16 in total

1.  Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes.

Authors:  Louise-Anne McNutt; Chuntao Wu; Xiaonan Xue; Jean Paul Hafner
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Relation of pooled logistic regression to time dependent Cox regression analysis: the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  R B D'Agostino; M L Lee; A J Belanger; L A Cupples; K Anderson; W B Kannel
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes.

Authors:  J Zhang; K F Yu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-11-18       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Prevalent vertebral deformities predict mortality and hospitalization in older women with low bone mass. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group.

Authors:  K E Ensrud; D E Thompson; J A Cauley; M C Nevitt; D M Kado; M C Hochberg; A C Santora; D M Black
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  Evaluation of receiver operating characteristic curve data in terms of information theory, with applications in radiography.

Authors:  C E Metz; D J Goodenough; K Rossmann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Automated variable selection methods for logistic regression produced unstable models for predicting acute myocardial infarction mortality.

Authors:  Peter C Austin; Jack V Tu
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Changes in bone density and turnover explain the reductions in incidence of nonvertebral fractures that occur during treatment with antiresorptive agents.

Authors:  Marc C Hochberg; Susan Greenspan; Richard D Wasnich; Paul Miller; Desmond E Thompson; Philip D Ross
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Characteristics of a prevalent vertebral deformity predict subsequent vertebral fracture: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS).

Authors:  Mark Lunt; Terence W O'Neill; Dieter Felsenberg; Jonathan Reeve; John A Kanis; Cyrus Cooper; Alan J Silman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Hip fracture prediction in elderly men and women: validation in the Rotterdam study.

Authors:  C E De Laet; B A Van Hout; H Burger; A E Weel; A Hofman; H A Pols
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Choosing between predictors of fractures.

Authors:  S L Hui; C W Slemenda; M A Carey; C C Johnston
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  4 in total

1.  [Metabolic bone diseases].

Authors:  F Jakob
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 0.743

2.  A novel quantitative method for estimating bone mineral density using B-mode ultrasound and radiofrequency signals-a pilot study on patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Violeta-Claudia Bojincă; Claudiu C Popescu; Raluca-Daniela Decianu; Andrei Dobrescu; Șerban Mihai Bălănescu; Andra-Rodica Bălănescu; Mihai Bojincă
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 3.  European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  J A Kanis; N Burlet; C Cooper; P D Delmas; J-Y Reginster; F Borgstrom; R Rizzoli
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  J A Kanis; E V McCloskey; H Johansson; C Cooper; R Rizzoli; J-Y Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 4.507

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.