Literature DB >> 14529208

Monte Carlo simulations of a scintillation camera using GATE: validation and application modelling.

Steven Staelens1, Daniel Strul, Giovanni Santin, Stefaan Vandenberghe, Michel Koole, Yves D'Asseler, Ignace Lemahieu, Rik Van de Walle.   

Abstract

Geant4 application for tomographic emission (GATE) is a recently developed simulation platform based on Geant4, specifically designed for PET and SPECT studies. In this paper we present validation results of GATE based on the comparison of simulations against experimental data, acquired with a standard SPECT camera. The most important components of the scintillation camera were modelled. The photoelectric effect. Compton and Rayleigh scatter are included in the gamma transport process. Special attention was paid to the processes involved in the collimator: scatter, penetration and lead fluorescence. A LEHR and a MEGP collimator were modelled as closely as possible to their shape and dimensions. In the validation study, we compared the simulated and measured energy spectra of different isotopes: 99mTc, 22Na, 57Co and 67Ga. The sensitivity was evaluated by using sources at varying distances from the detector surface. Scatter component analysis was performed in different energy windows at different distances from the detector and for different attenuation geometries. Spatial resolution was evaluated using a 99mTc source at various distances. Overall results showed very good agreement between the acquisitions and the simulations. The clinical usefulness of GATE depends on its ability to use voxelized datasets. Therefore, a clinical extension was written so that digital patient data can be read in by the simulator as a source distribution or as an attenuating geometry. Following this validation we modelled two additional camera designs: the Beacon transmission device for attenuation correction and the Solstice scanner prototype with a rotating collimator. For the first setup a scatter analysis was performed and for the latter design. the simulated sensitivity results were compared against theoretical predictions. Both case studies demonstrated the flexibility and accuracy of GATE and exemplified its potential benefits in protocol optimization and in system design.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14529208     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/48/18/305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  11 in total

1.  GATE: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT.

Authors:  S Jan; G Santin; D Strul; S Staelens; K Assié; D Autret; S Avner; R Barbier; M Bardiès; P M Bloomfield; D Brasse; V Breton; P Bruyndonckx; I Buvat; A F Chatziioannou; Y Choi; Y H Chung; C Comtat; D Donnarieix; L Ferrer; S J Glick; C J Groiselle; D Guez; P F Honore; S Kerhoas-Cavata; A S Kirov; V Kohli; M Koole; M Krieguer; D J van der Laan; F Lamare; G Largeron; C Lartizien; D Lazaro; M C Maas; L Maigne; F Mayet; F Melot; C Merheb; E Pennacchio; J Perez; U Pietrzyk; F R Rannou; M Rey; D R Schaart; C R Schmidtlein; L Simon; T Y Song; J M Vieira; D Visvikis; R Van de Walle; E Wieërs; C Morel
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Degradation of myocardial perfusion SPECT images caused by contaminants in thallous (201Tl) chloride.

Authors:  Steven G Staelens; Tim C de Wit; Ignace A Lemahieu; Freek J Beekman
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Integration of SimSET photon history generator in GATE for efficient Monte Carlo simulations of pinhole SPECT.

Authors:  Chia-Lin Chen; Yuchuan Wang; Jason J S Lee; Benjamin M W Tsui
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  SIMIND Monte Carlo simulation of a single photon emission CT.

Authors:  M T Bahreyni Toossi; J Pirayesh Islamian; M Momennezhad; M Ljungberg; S H Naseri
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2010-01

5.  Preclinical positron emission tomography scanner based on a monolithic annulus of scintillator: initial design study.

Authors:  Alexander V Stolin; Peter F Martone; Gangadhar Jaliparthi; Raymond R Raylman
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-01-05

6.  MCAT to XCAT: The Evolution of 4-D Computerized Phantoms for Imaging Research: Computer models that take account of body movements promise to provide evaluation and improvement of medical imaging devices and technology.

Authors:  W Paul Segars; Benjamin M W Tsui
Journal:  Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 10.961

7.  Variation of Contrast Values for Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography Hybrid Systems with Different Correction Methods.

Authors:  Hazem M Tantawy; Yasser G Abdelhafez; Nadia L Helal; Ibrahim E Saad
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2020-09-25

8.  Effects of system geometry and other physical factors on photon sensitivity of high-resolution positron emission tomography.

Authors:  F Habte; A M K Foudray; P D Olcott; C S Levin
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Development and validation of a full model of a four-headed neuroimaging single-photon emission computed tomography scanner.

Authors:  Blair A Johnston; Alice Nicol; Alison Bolster; Jamie Wright
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.690

10.  Monte Carlo simulation and performance assessment of GE Discovery 690 VCT positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanner.

Authors:  Elham Kashian; Hadi Taleshi Ahangari; Vahab Dehlaghi; Karim Khoshgard; Pardis Ghafarian; Raheb Ghorbani
Journal:  World J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-07-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.