Literature DB >> 14529206

Segment-based dose optimization using a genetic algorithm.

Cristian Cotrutz1, Lei Xing.   

Abstract

Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) inverse planning is conventionally done in two steps. Firstly, the intensity maps of the treatment beams are optimized using a dose optimization algorithm. Each of them is then decomposed into a number of segments using a leaf-sequencing algorithm for delivery. An alternative approach is to pre-assign a fixed number of field apertures and optimize directly the shapes and weights of the apertures. While the latter approach has the advantage of eliminating the leaf-sequencing step, the optimization of aperture shapes is less straightforward than that of beamlet-based optimization because of the complex dependence of the dose on the field shapes, and their weights. In this work we report a genetic algorithm for segment-based optimization. Different from a gradient iterative approach or simulated annealing, the algorithm finds the optimum solution from a population of candidate plans. In this technique, each solution is encoded using three chromosomes: one for the position of the left-bank leaves of each segment, the second for the position of the right-bank and the third for the weights of the segments defined by the first two chromosomes. The convergence towards the optimum is realized by crossover and mutation operators that ensure proper exchange of information between the three chromosomes of all the solutions in the population. The algorithm is applied to a phantom and a prostate case and the results are compared with those obtained using beamlet-based optimization. The main conclusion drawn from this study is that the genetic optimization of segment shapes and weights can produce highly conformal dose distribution. In addition, our study also confirms previous findings that fewer segments are generally needed to generate plans that are comparable with the plans obtained using beamlet-based optimization. Thus the technique may have useful applications in facilitating IMRT treatment planning.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14529206     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/48/18/303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  23 in total

1.  Effect of photon-beam energy on VMAT and IMRT treatment plan quality and dosimetric accuracy for advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Marlies Pasler; Dietmar Georg; Holger Wirtz; Johannes Lutterbach
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Bridging the gap between IMRT and VMAT: dense angularly sampled and sparse intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Ruijiang Li; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Inverse planning for four-dimensional (4D) volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  Yunzhi Ma; Daniel Chang; Paul Keall; Yiaoqin Xie; Jae-yoon Park; Tae-suk Suh; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Improving IMRT delivery efficiency with reweighted L1-minimization for inverse planning.

Authors:  Hojin Kim; Stephen Becker; Rena Lee; Soonhyouk Lee; Sukyoung Shin; Emmanuel Candès; Lei Xing; Ruijiang Li
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Search for IMRT inverse plans with piecewise constant fluence maps using compressed sensing techniques.

Authors:  Lei Zhu; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Four-dimensional inverse treatment planning with inclusion of implanted fiducials in IMRT segmented fields.

Authors:  Yunzhi Ma; Louis Lee; O Keshet; Paul Keall; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Inverse planning for IMRT with nonuniform beam profiles using total-variation regularization (TVR).

Authors:  Taeho Kim; Lei Zhu; Tae-Suk Suh; Sarah Geneser; Bowen Meng; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Simultaneous beam sampling and aperture shape optimization for SPORT.

Authors:  Masoud Zarepisheh; Ruijiang Li; Yinyu Ye; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  An empirical method for automatic determination of maximum number of segments in DMPO-based IMRT for Head and Neck cases.

Authors:  Vaitheeswaran Ranganathan; K Joseph Maria Das
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-09-30

10.  Node-positive left-sided breast cancer: does VMAT improve treatment plan quality with respect to IMRT?

Authors:  M Pasler; D Georg; S Bartelt; J Lutterbach
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-03-24       Impact factor: 3.621

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.