Literature DB >> 14528898

Attentional focus, processing load, and Stroop interference.

Zhe Chen1.   

Abstract

Although the effects of attentional focus and perceptual load on selective attention when targets and distractors are distinct objects that occupy separate locations are well known, there has been little examination of their role when both relevant and irrelevant information pertains to the same object. In four experiments, participants were shown Stroop color words or strings of letters in a task of speeded color identification. When the participants' attentional focus was manipulated via cue validity or precue size, greater Stroop interference was observed when the attentional focus was narrow than when it was broad. However, when the participants were induced to adopt a comparable attentional focus in a dual-task paradigm, the differential Stroop interference was eliminated. Furthermore, contrary to the prediction of the perceptual load hypothesis, different levels of processing load did not lead to differential Stroop interference. These results emphasize the importance of stimulus structure in understanding distractor processing. They indicate that when relevant and irrelevant information pertains to the same object, narrowing attentional focus increases distractor processing, and perceptual load has a negligible effect on the extent of distractor processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14528898     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194822

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  24 in total

1.  Does high memory load kick task-irrelevant information out of visual working memory?

Authors:  Jun Yin; Jifan Zhou; Haokui Xu; Junying Liang; Zaifeng Gao; Mowei Shen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

Review 2.  Twenty years of load theory-Where are we now, and where should we go next?

Authors:  Gillian Murphy; John A Groeger; Ciara M Greene
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

3.  On the capacity of attention: its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; Emily M Elliott; J Scott Saults; Candice C Morey; Sam Mattox; Anna Hismjatullina; Andrew R A Conway
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Attentional modulation in the detection of irrelevant deviance: a simultaneous ERP/fMRI study.

Authors:  M Sabri; E Liebenthal; E J Waldron; D A Medler; J R Binder
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Distractor interference stays constant despite variation in working memory load.

Authors:  Zhe Chen; Celestien C Chan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-04

6.  Exploring the temporal dynamics of social facilitation in the Stroop task.

Authors:  Dinkar Sharma; Rob Booth; Rupert Brown; Pascal Huguet
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-02

7.  Are spatial and dimensional attention separate? evidence from Posner, Stroop, and Eriksen tasks.

Authors:  Eran Chajut; Asi Schupak; Daniel Algom
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-09

8.  The Stroop-matching task as a tool to study the correspondence effect using images of graspable and non-graspable objects.

Authors:  Ariane Leão Caldas; Walter Machado-Pinheiro; Olga Daneyko; Lucia Riggio
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-04-27

9.  Attentional selection within and across hemispheres: implications for the perceptual load theory.

Authors:  Ping Wei; Guanlan Kang; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Analyzing distributional properties of interference effects across modalities: chances and challenges.

Authors:  Kerstin Dittrich; David Kellen; Christoph Stahl
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-03-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.