Literature DB >> 17694918

Distractor interference stays constant despite variation in working memory load.

Zhe Chen1, Celestien C Chan.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that working memory (WM) plays an important role in selective attention, sothat high WM load leads to inefficient distractor inhibition, in comparison with low WM load. In the present study, we examined the effect of WM on distractor processing while the extent of attentional focus was held constant. Our results show that WM load affected distractor processing only when it was positively correlated with the extent of attentional focus. When the latter was held constant, the effect ofWM became negligible. Furthermore, when low WM load was paired with a wide attentional focus and high WM load was matched with a narrow attentional focus, greater distractor processing was found when the WM load was low than when it was high. These results suggest that efficient distractor inhibition may require only minimal WM resources and that the effect of WM on distractor processing is more complex than has previously been assumed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17694918     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  17 in total

1.  An object-based cost of visual filtering.

Authors:  Z Chen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-04

2.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.

Authors:  N Cowan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.579

3.  Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: individual differences in voluntary saccade control.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Josef C Schrock; Randall W Engle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 4.  Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Reducing the effects of adjacent distractors by narrowing attention.

Authors:  D LaBerge; V Brown; M Carter; D Bash; A Hartley
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  The role of working memory in visual selective attention.

Authors:  J W de Fockert; G Rees; C D Frith; N Lavie
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-03-02       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: a zoom lens model.

Authors:  C W Eriksen; J D St James
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-10

8.  Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention.

Authors:  N Lavie
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search.

Authors:  S Yantis; J Jonides
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied.

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-04
View more
  6 in total

1.  Trait anxiety and impoverished prefrontal control of attention.

Authors:  Sonia J Bishop
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-12-14       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Low level perceptual, not attentional, processes modulate distractor interference in high perceptual load displays: evidence from neglect/extinction.

Authors:  Carmel Mevorach; Yehoshua Tsal; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-01-10

3.  Re-examining the automaticity and directionality of the activation of the spatial-valence "good is up" metaphoric association.

Authors:  Yanli Huang; Chi-Shing Tse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Do gaze and non-gaze stimuli trigger different spatial interference effects? It depends on stimulus perceivability.

Authors:  Zhe Chen; Rebecca H Thomas; Makayla S Chen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-13

5.  Beyond perceptual load and dilution: a review of the role of working memory in selective attention.

Authors:  Jan W de Fockert
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-21

6.  Conceptual and methodological concerns in the theory of perceptual load.

Authors:  Hanna Benoni; Yehoshua Tsal
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-08-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.